Keywords
methods
skills
сomputer assisted language learning
listening
How to Cite
Abstract
The article presents Web-based CALL methods used in the study of foreign language. It is defined the role played by different strategies of listening. Classification of the strategies is described in details. The factors that affect the strategy of listening are defined through analysis of many researches. Using listening strategies helps students in foreign languages learning significantly. On the example of I. Ya. Horbachevskyy Ternopil State Medical University. it has been explored the strategies for professional foreign languages learning by future doctors.References
Ahmadi, A., & Yamini, M. Relationship between field dependence/independence and listening comprehension strategy use by female Iranian English majors // Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities. – 2003. – №46(187) – 61–72 р.
Bacon, S. M. The relationship between gender comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening // The Modern Language Journal —1992. – №76(2),. —160–178 р.
Bidabadi, F. S., & Yamat, H. (2010). The relationship between listening strategies employed by Iranian EFL freshman university students and their learning style preferences // European Journal of Social Sciences. – 2010. – №16(3). – 342–351 р.
Chang, C. A. Sources of listening anxiety in learning English as a foreign language // Perceptual and Motor Skills 2008. – №106. – 21–34 р.
Fotos, S., & Browne, C. M. New perspectives on call for second language classrooms // Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2004.
Golchi, M. M. Listening anxiety and its relationship with listening strategy use and listening comprehension among Iranian IELTS learners // International Journal of English Linguistics. – 22012. – №2(4) . – 115–126 р.
Gonen, M. The relationship between FL listening anxiety and FL listening strategies: The case of Turkish EFL learners. Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS/IASM // International Conference on Educational Technologies, 2009. – 44–49 р.
Jowkar, M. (2012). The relationship between perceptual learning style preferences and listening comprehension strategies of Iranian intermediate EFL learners // Academic Research International. – 2012. – №2(2) . – 739–745 р.
Kemp, J. The listening log: Motivating autonomous learning // ELT Journal. – 2010. – №64. – 385–395 р.
Levy, M. . CALL: Context and conceptualisation. – Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1997.
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition // Applied Linguistics. – 1989. – №10. – 418–437 р.
Rost, M. Teaching and researching listening. – Harlow, England: Longman, 2002.
Serri, F., Boroujeni, A. J., & Hesabi, A. Cognitive, metacognitive, and social/affective strategies in listening comprehension and their relationship with individual differences // Theory and Practice in Language Studies. – 2012. – №2(4) . – 843–849 р.
Smidt, E., & Hegelheimer, V. Effects of online academic lectures on ESL listening comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, and strategy use // Computer Assisted Language Learning. – 2004. – №17(5) . – 517–556 р.
Teng, H. C. An investigation of EFL listening strategies by Taiwanese college students // Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching. —1998. – №6. – 509–520 р.
Tutunis, B. T. Awareness raising on learner’s listening strategies and impact on listening performanc. – ERIC ED462011, 2001.
Vandergrift, L. The strategies of second language (French) listeners // Foreign Language Annals. – 1997. – №30. – 387–409 р.
Vandergrift, L. The Cinderella of communication strategies. Reception strategies in interactive listeningи// The Modern Language Journal. – 1997. – №81(4) . – 494–505 р.
Vandergrift, L. Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies // ELT Journal. —1999. – №53(3) . – 168–176 р.
Vandergrift, L. Orchestrating strategy use: Towards a model of the skilled L2 listener // Language Learning. – 2003. – №53. – 461–494 р.
Vandergrift, L. Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening // Applied Linguistics. – 2005. – №6(1) . – 70–89 р.
Vandergrift, L. Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? // The Modern Language Journal. —2006. – №90(1) . – 6–18 р.
REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)
Ahmadi, A., & Yamini, M. (2003). Relationship between field dependence/independence and listening comprehension strategy use by female Iranian English majors. Journal of Faculty of Letters and Humanities, 46(187), 61–72 (in English).
Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. The Modern Language Journal, 76(2), 160–178 (in English).
Bidabadi, F. S., & Yamat, H. (2010). The relationship between listening strategies employed by Iranian EFL freshman university students and their learning style preferences. European Journal of Social Sciences, 16(3), 342–351 (in English).
Chang, C. A. (2008). Sources of listening anxiety in learning English as a foreign language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 21–34 (in English).
Fotos, S., & Browne, C. M. (2004). New perspectives on call for second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc (in English).
Golchi, M. M. (2012). Listening anxiety and its relationship with listening strategy use and listening comprehension among Iranian IELTS learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(4), 115–126 (in English).
Gonen, M. (2009). The relationship between FL listening anxiety and FL listening strategies: The case of Turkish EFL learners. Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Educational Technologies, 44–49 (in English).
Jowkar, M. (2012). The relationship between perceptual learning style preferences and listening comprehension strategies of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Academic Research International, 2(2), 739–745 (in English).
Kemp, J. (2010). The listening log: Motivating autonomous learning. ELT Journal, 64, 385–395 (in English).
Levy, M. (1997). CALL: Context and conceptualisation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (in English).
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 418–437 (in English).
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Harlow, England: Longman (in English).
Serri, F., Boroujeni, A. J., & Hesabi, A. (2012). Cognitive, metacognitive, and social/affective strategies in listening comprehension and their relationship with individual differences. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 843–849 (in English).
Smidt, E., & Hegelheimer, V. (2004). Effects of online academic lectures on ESL listening comprehension, incidental vocabulary acquisition, and strategy use. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(5), 517–556 (in English).
Teng, H. C. (1998). An investigation of EFL listening strategies by Taiwanese college students. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching, 6, 509–520 (in English).
Tutunis, B. T. (2001). Awareness raising on learner’s listening strategies and impact on listening performance. ERIC ED462011 (in English).
Vandergrift, L. (1997a). The strategies of second language (French) listeners. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387–409 (in English).
Vandergrift, L. (1997b). The Cinderella of communication strategies: Reception strategies in interactive listening. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 494–505 (in English).
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53(3), 168–176 (in English).
Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Towards a model of the skilled L2 listener. Language Learning, 53, 461–494 (in English).
Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 70–89 (in English).
Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6–18 (in English).
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
Content Licensing
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.
Deposit Policy
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.