Abstract
Ways of determination of professional requirements to the teacher by the society are discussed. The review of initial teacher licensure system in USA is done. Basic characteristics of different types of initial licensure tests are considered.References
Юнавичюте Л. Начальная подготовка учителей // Совершенствование систем образования: Стратегические приоритеты в подготовке и повышении квалификации учителей, в осуществлении контроля качества их работы. Материалы конференции. – Будапешт, 1999. – С. 57 – 59.
Ладеръер П. Начальная подготовка учителей // Совершенствование систем образования: Стратегические приоритеты в подготовке и повышении квалификации учителей, в осуществлении контроля качества их работы. Материалы конференции. – Будапешт, 1999. – С. 45 – 56.
Келли Дж. Роль образования и подготовки учителей в удовлетворении индивидуальных, общественных и экономических нужд // Совершенствование систем образования: Стратегические приоритеты в подготовке и повышении квалификации учителей, в осуществлении контроля качества их работы. Материалы конференции. – Будапешт, 1999. – С. 10 – 17.
Karen J. Mitchell, David Z. Robinson, Barbara S. Plake, Kaeli T. Knowles. Testing Teacher Candidates. The rile of licensure tests in improving teacher quality // Committee on Assessment and Teacher Quality. National Research Council. National Academy Press. Washington, DC. – 2003. 460 p.
Schmitt, K. (2000). An overview of credentialing. Paper commissioned by the Committee on Assessment and Teacher Quality, Center for Education, National Research Council. Unpublished paper; to obtain a copy contact the author at karaschmitt @hotmail.com.
Andrews T., Andrews L. (Eds.). The NAS-DTEC Manual on the preparation and certification personnel 5th ed. // National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. Dubuque, IA: Kendall / Hunt. 2000.
Removing the barriers to improving teaching. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. 2001.
From National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. 2000.
Quality Counts. From Education Week. 2000, № 52.
Understanding your Praxis scores 1998–99. Educational Testing Service. [Booklet]. Princeton, NJ: 1999.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
Content Licensing
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.
Deposit Policy
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.