THE STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC WRITING SKILL AFTER IMPLEMENTING BLENDED LEARNING USING FACEBOOK
AbstractAlmost all students use smartphone for their daily activities. Nowadays, the student’s literacy on information technology is very good, but sometimes it has not been considered in school learning. One of the essential competencies of undergraduate school is academic writing skill. There is a gap between the student competencies and the learning strategy in certain learning subjects. The aim of this research is to examine the effectiveness of blended mobile learning activity using Facebook to improve student writing skill. This research used timed essay examination to measure the writing skill after one semester learning activity using this strategy and student satisfaction responses to learning. There were four aspects used as criteria of writing skill: ideas, organization, wording, and flavor. The results showed that this learning approach had shown good results in some aspects, particularly in improving the skill of shaping ideas and organizing the ideas into written form. The uses of various learning strategies that make students more active and centered on students tend to increase the ability of students to search for new ideas creatively. Among others, the positive aspect is the students have the knowledge and understanding of new concepts that can support the idea of writing in the aspect of idea and various choices of words.
Tal, H. M., & Gross, M. (2014). Teaching Sustainability via Smartphone-Enhanced Experiential Learning in a Botanical Garden. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technology, 8(1), 10-15.
Thinley, P., Reye, J., & Geva, S. (2014). Tablets (iPad) for M-Learning in the Context of Social Constructivism to Institute an Effective Learning Environment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technology; 8(1), 16-20.
Mohammad, H., Fayyoumi, A., & AlShathry, O. (2015). Do We Have to Prohibit the Use of Mobile Phones in Classrooms? International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technology, 9(2), 54-57.
Ebrahim, H. S., Ezzadeen, K., & A.K, A. (2015). Acquiring Knowledge through Mobile Applications. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technology, 9(3), 71-74.
Chen, C.-H., Chen, S.-H., Hwang, G.-J., & Yang, T.-C. (2010). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption of a ubiquitous technology application in supporting teacher performance. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 4(1), 39-54.
Crampton, A., Ragusa, A. T., & Cavanagh, H. (2012). Cross-discipline investigation of the relationship between academic performance and online resource access by distance education students. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 1-13.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Mobile Usability in Educational Contexts: What have we learnt? . International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-12.
Babiker, M. E. (2015). For Effective Use of Multimedia in Education, Teachers Must Develop their Own Educational Multimedia Applications. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 62-68.
Akkoyunlu, B., & Soylu, M. Y. (2008). A Study of Student’s Perceptions in a Blended Learning Environment Based on Different Learning Styles. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 183-193.
Yen, J.-C., & Lee, C.-Y. (2011). Exploring problem solving patterns and their impact on learning achievement in a blended learning environment. Computers & Education, 56, 138–145.
Schober, A., & Keller, L. (2012). Impact Factors for Learner Motivation in Blended Learning Environments. International Journal of Emerging Technology, 7(2: FNMA), 37-41.
Donnelly, R. (2010). Harmonizing Technology With Interaftion In Blended Problem-Based Learning. Computers and Education, 54(2), 350-359.
Delialioğlu, Ö. (2012). Student Engagement in Blended Learning Environments with Lecture-Based and Problem-Based Instructional Approaches. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 310–322.
Poon, J. (2013). Blended Learning: An Institutional Approach for Enhancing Students' Learning Experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271-288.
Liu, S.-H. (2010). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56, 1012–1022.
Caudery, T. (1990). The validity of timed essay tests in the assessment of writing skills. ELT Journal, 44(2), 122-131.
Brown, G. T. (2010). The validity of examination essays in higher education: Issues and responses. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(3), 276-291.
Knoch, U., May, L., Macqueen, S., Pill, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Transitioning from university to the workplace: Stakeholder perceptions of academic and professional writing demands. IELTS Research Reports Online Series, 37.
Jani, J. S., & Mellinger, M. S. (2015). Beyond “Writing to Learn”: Factors Influencing Students’ Writing Outcomes. Journal of Social Work Education,51(1), 136-152.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College composition and communication, 32(4), 365-387.
Melvin, L., Connolly, K., Pitre, L., Dore, K. L., & Wasi, P. (2015). Improving medical students’ written communication skills: design and evaluation of an educational curriculum. Postgraduate medical journal, postgradmedj-2014.
Van Dyke, F., Malloy, E. J., & Stallings, V. (2015). Conceptual writing in college-level mathematics courses and its impact on performance and attitude. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(2), 223-233.
Miller, L. C., Russell, C. L., Cheng, A. L., & Skarbek, A. J. (2015). Evaluating undergraduate nursing students' self-efficacy and competence in writing: Effects of a writing intensive intervention. Nurse education in practice, 15(3), 174-180.
Barrot, J. S. (2016). Using Facebook-based e-portfolio in ESL writing classrooms: impact and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1-16.
Adewoyin, O., Wu, K., & Vassileva, J. (2015). Exploiting the Use of Wikis to Support Collaborative Writing: A Case Study of an Undergraduate Computer Science Class. In Collaboration and Technology (pp. 111-123). Springer International Publishing.
Verkade, H., & Lim, S. H. (2016). Undergraduate Science Students’ Attitudes Toward and Approaches to Scientific Reading and Writing. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(4), 83.
Mercer-Mapstone, L. D., & Matthews, K. E. (2015). Student perceptions of communication skills in undergraduate science at an Australian research-intensive university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-17.
Cordero, K., Nussbaum, M., Ibaseta, V., Otaíza, M. J., Gleisner, S., González, S., ... & Chiuminatto, P. (2015). Read Create Share (RCS): A new digital tool for interactive reading and writing. Computers & Education, 82, 486-496.
Dowd, J. E., Connolly, M. P., Thompson Jr, R. J., & Reynolds, J. A. (2015). Improved reasoning in undergraduate writing through structured workshops. The Journal of Economic Education, 46(1), 14-27.
Garside, J., Bailey, R., Tyas, M., Ormrod, G., Stone, G., Topping, A., & Gillibrand, W. P. (2015). Developing a culture of publication: a joint enterprise writing retreat. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 7(2), 429-442.
Stewart, G., Seifert, T. A., & Rolheiser, C. (2015). Anxiety and self-efficacy’s relationship with undergraduate students’ perceptions of the use of metacognitive writing strategies. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 4.
Trace, J., Janssen, G., & Meier, V. (2015). Measuring the impact of rater negotiation in writing performance assessment. Language Testing, 0265532215594830.
Beck, S. W., Llosa, L., Black, K., & Trzeszkowski‐Giese, A. (2015). Beyond the Rubric. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(8), 670-681.
Greenberg, K. P. (2015). Rubric Use in Formative Assessment A Detailed Behavioral Rubric Helps Students Improve Their Scientific Writing Skills. Teaching of Psychology, 0098628315587618.
de Leeuw, J. (2016). Rubrics and Exemplars in Writing Assessment. In Leadership of Assessment, Inclusion, and Learning (pp. 89-110). Springer International Publishing.
McNaught, K., & Shaw, G. (2016). Preparing undergraduate students to be successful writers: Exploring the Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation skills of students identified as potentially ‘at risk’. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 10(2), A11-A19.
Yi, J. (2009). Defining Writing Ability for Classroom Writing Assessment in High Schools. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 53-69 53.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.