IRANIAN LEARNERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE IMPACT OF TECHNOLOGY-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION ON THEIR ENGLISH AURAL/ORAL SKILLS
AbstractThe present study aimed to investigate the perceptions of Iranian English as Foreign Language (EFL) learners regarding the impact of technology-assisted instruction through the utilization of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) on their listening comprehension and speaking ability. To this end, eighty Iranian EFL learners whose age range was between twenty to thirty five took part in the study. They were randomly divided into four groups and were exposed to technology-assisted instruction on their course-related contents through different ICTs as their out-of-class activities for one hour per week during two and a half months. The ICTs which were the focus of this study included: Podcasts, YouTube, Skype, and Instagram. The analysis of the participants’ answers indicated that the majority of them (83.8%) were positive toward technology-assisted instruction. In addition, 80% of them tended to use ICTs for their future language learning purposes.
Albirini, A. 2006. Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers, Computers & Education 47, 373–398.
Canning-Wilson, Ch. 2000. Practical aspects of using video in the foreign language classroom, The Internet TESL Journal, VI (11). Available from: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Canning-Video.html
Chiu, M. W. 2003. Computer-assisted language learning: Attitudes of Taiwanese college students, Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of West Florida.
Computer-based technologies in the creative arts KLA: Enhancing student learning. 1997. Available from http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/8701994
Eugene, J. 2006. How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581-597.
Hismanoglu, M. 2012. Prospective EFL teachers' perceptions of ICT integration: A study of distance higher education in Turkey. Educational Technology & Society, 15 (1), 185–196.
JISC. 2009. Effective Practice in a Digital Age: A guide to technology-enhanced learning and teaching. Available from: https://www.dkit.ie/system/files/Effective%20practice%20in%20a%20digital%20age%20JISC_0.pdf
Kavaliauskienė, G., & Anusienė, L. 2009. English for specific purposes: Podcasts for listening skills, Santalka. Filologija. Edukologija, 17(2), 28–37.
Kim, D., & King, K. 2011. Implementing podcasts with ESOL teacher candidates’ preparation: Interpretations and implication. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 7(2), 5-19.
Li, H. C. 2010. Using podcasts for learning English: Perceptions of Hong Kong secondary 6 ESL students. ELT World Online, 4, 78-90.
Monk, B., Ozawa, K., & Thomas, M. 2006. iPods in English language education: A case study of English listening and reading students. NUCB journal of language culture and communication, 8(3), 85–102.
Ogden, D. 2015. Skype as a scaffolding tool for underprepared freshmen English composition students, Unpublished PhD dissertation, Walden University.
Park, Ch. N., & Son, J-B. 2009. Implementing computer-assisted language learning in the EFL classroom: teachers' perceptions and perspectives. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5 (2). 80-101.
Salbego, N. N., & Tumolo, C. H. S. 2015. Skype Classes: Teachers and students’ perceptions on synchronous online classes in relation to face-to-face teaching and learning, International Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics, 1 (3), 36-45.
Shah, P. M., & Empungan, J. L. 2015. ESL teachers’ attitudes towards using ICT in literature lessons, International Journal of English Language Education, 3 (1), 201-218.
Stiffler, D., Stoten, S., & Cullen, D. 2011. Podcasting as an instructional supplement to online learning. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 29(3), 144-148.
Young, M. 2012. Exploring the pros and cons of online, hybrid, and face-to-face class formats, leading change in public higher education: A provost report series on trends and issues facing higher education. Available from: http://www.washington.edu/provost/files/2012/11/edtrends_Pros-Cons ClassFormats.pdf
Yunus, M. M., & Suliman, A. 2014. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools in teaching and learning literature component in Malaysian secondary schools, Asian Social Science, 10 (7), 136-152.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.