COMPETENCE CRITERIA OF TEACHERS AT BLENDED LEARNING OF ENGINEERING STUDENTS

Keywords: professional competences, skills and abilities, competence criteria of teachers, teachers’ certification, teaching staff, blended learning, hybrid form of education

Abstract

The work is devoted to the definition of competence criteria of teachers in the mixed (hybrid) education of engineering students. The study was conducted based on generalization of known competence criteria of teachers of traditional education and analysis of publications of domestic and foreign authors devoted to the problems of mixed education. The competence criteria of the teachers in mixed training of engineering students were proposed, an expert evaluation of the importance of each criterion was conducted using the non-parametric Friedman criterion. 27 criteria which are most significant for assessing the competence of teachers in the mixed education of engineering students were identified. Taking into account the specificity of the teacher's work in mixed education, the singled out competence criteria were divided into three subgroups.

Author Biographies

Kateryna A. Ivanova, Sumy State University, Sumy
postgraduate of the Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Machines and Tools
Oleksandr M. Alekseev, Sumy State University, Sumy
Doctor of Pedagogical Science, Professor, Professor of the Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Machines and Tools

References

J.Papay, "Refocusing the Debate: Assessing the Purposes and Tools of Teacher Evaluation",Harvard Educational Review, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 123-141, Mar. 2012.doi: 10.17763/haer.82.1.v40p0833345w6384.

T. Petty, A. Good, and L. Handler, "Impact on Student Learning: National Board Certified Teachers’ Perceptions",Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 24, art.no.49, Apr. 2016,doi: 10.14507/epaa.24.2227.

A. itchell, and A. Shoho, "High School Teachers Perceptions of School Change and its Implications for Student Achievement",Leadership and Policy in Schools,pp. 1-24, Aug. 2016,doi: 10.1080/15700763.2016.1205199.

J. MMillan, "National Board Certified Teachers' Perspectives on using Measures of Student Learning for Teacher Evaluation",EducationalForum,vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 48-60, Jan. 2016,doi: 10.1080/00131725.2015.1102366.

S. Konstantopoulos, "Teacher Effects, Value-Added Models, and Accountability", Teachers College Record, vol. 116, no. 1, art. no. 17290, pp. 1-21,2014.

T. Adams, E. Aguilar, E. Berg, L. Cismowski, A. Cody, D. B. Cohen, S. Dean, L. Formigli, J. Fung, C. Lee, K. Marshall, N. Skorko, and S. White, "A Coherent System of Teacher Evaluation for Quality Teaching", Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 23, no. 17, pp.1-26, Febr. 2015,doi: 10.14507/epaa.v23.2006.

E. Hartell, L. Gumaelius, and J. Svärdh, "Investigating Technology Teachers’ Self-Efficacy on Assessment", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 25, no.3, pp. 321-337, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10798-014-9285-9.

S. Martín, M. González, and J. DeArriba,"Knowledge Management: Experiences of Collaborative Work using ICT with Students", Digital Education Review, vol. 30, pp. 184-206, Dec. 2016.

J. Briceño Martínez, and M. Castellanos Saavedra, "Certification Programs for Training Teachers in the in ICT use", Opcion, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 164-178, 2016.

Н. Никуличева, "Какими компетенциями должен обладать преподаватель дистанционного обучения и как их сформировать", e-LearningPRO, № 11, 2009. [Электронный ресурс]. Доступно: http://www.elearningpro.ru/page/zhurnal-pro-elearning

Г. Мурасова,"Специфіка роботи викладача в системі дистанційної освіти", на ІVМіжнар. наук.-практ. конф. "Освітній процес: погляд з середини", Дніпродзержинськ, 2010. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://www.confcontact.com/20102911/4_muras.htm

Э. Кадырова, "Реализация компетентностного подхода при подготовке преподавателя для СДО вуза", всеукраїнськ. науково-практ.конф. MoodleMootUkraine 2013. Теорія і практика використання системи управління навчанням Moodle, Київ, 2013. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://2013.moodlemoot.in.ua/course/view.php?id=75&lang=ru.

R. A. Ellisa, A. Pardob, andF. Hana, "Quality in blended learning environments – Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations», Computers& Education, vol. 102, pp. 90-102, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006//

К. Лісецький, "Змішані і традиційні форми навчання", на VІІ Міжн. наук.-практ. Інтернет – конф. "Сучасні методи викладання іноземної мови професійного спрямування у вищій школі", Київ, 2013, с 223-235.

Pavla Slechtova, Hana Vojackova, Jan Voracek, "Blended Learning: Promising Strategic Alternative in Higher Education", Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,vol. 171, pp. 1245-1254, Jan. 2015,doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.238//.

V. Bensona, and A. Kolsakerb, "Instructor Approaches to Blended Learning: A Tale of Two Business Schools", The International Journal of Management Education,vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 316-325, Oct. 2015, doi:10.1016/jijme.2015.10.001.

В. Постников, "Анализ подходов к формированию состава экспертной группы, ориентированной на подготовку и принятие решений",Наука и образование, № 5, с. 333-346, Май 2012, doi: 10.7463/0512.0360720.

Л. В. Шелехова, Математические методы в педагогике и психологии: в схемах и таблицах, Майкоп, АГУ, 2010.

Program IBM SPSS Statistics. Доступно: http://www.predictivesolutions.ru/software/statistics.htm. Дата обращения: Maрт 2, 2016.


REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

J. Papay, "Refocusing the Debate: Assessing the Purposes and Tools of Teacher Evaluation", Harvard Educational Review, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 123-141, Mar. 2012.doi: 10.17763/haer.82.1.v40p0833345w6384. (in English)

T. Petty, A. Good, and L. Handler, "Impact on Student Learning: National Board Certified Teachers’ Perceptions", Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 24, art.no.49, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.14507/epaa.24.2227.(in English)

A. Mitchell, and A. Shoho, "High School Teachers Perceptions of School Change and its Implications for Student Achievement", Leadership and Policy in Schools, pp. 1-24, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1080/15700763.2016.1205199.(in English)

J. McMillan, "National Board Certified Teachers' Perspectives on using Measures of Student Learning for Teacher Evaluation", Educational Forum, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 48-60, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00131725.2015.1102366.(in English)

S. Konstantopoulos, "Teacher Effects, Value-Added Models, and Accountability", Teachers College Record, vol. 116, no. 1, art. no. 17290, pp. 1-21, 2014.(in English)

T. Adams, E. Aguilar, E. Berg, L. Cismowski, A. Cody, D. B. Cohen, S. Dean, L. Formigli, J. Fung, C. Lee, K. Marshall, N. Skorko, and S. White, "A Coherent System of Teacher Evaluation for Quality Teaching", Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 23, no. 17, pp.1-26, Febr. 2015, doi: 10.14507/epaa.v23.2006.(in English)

E. Hartell, L. Gumaelius, and J. Svärdh, "Investigating Technology Teachers’ Self-Efficacy on Assessment", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 321-337, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10798-014-9285-9.(in English)

S. Martín, M. González, and J. DeArriba, "Knowledge Management: Experiences of Collaborative Work using ICT with Students", Digital Education Review, vol. 30, pp. 184-206, Dec. 2016.

J. BriceñoMartínez, and M. Castellanos Saavedra, "Certification Programs for Training Teachers in the in ICT use", Opcion, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 164-178, 2016. (in English)

N. Nikulicheva, "What competencies should have a distance education teacher and how to form them",e-Learning PRO, № 11, 2009. [Electronicresource]. Available:http://www.elearningpro.ru/page/zhurnal-pro-elearning. (in Russian)

G. Murasova "The specifics of the teacher in system of distance education", the 4thInt. scientific and practicalconf. "Educational Process: Inside View", Dneprodzerzhinsk, 2010. [Electronic resource]. Available: http://www.confcontact.com/20102911/4_muras.htm. (in Ukrainian)

E. Kadyrova, "Implementation of the competence approach in the preparation of a teacher for the SDO of the university," the 1stUkrainianscientific and practical conf. MoodleMoot Ukraine 2013. Theory and Practice of the Using Management System Moodle, Kyiv, 2013. [Electronic resource]. Available: http://2013.moodlemoot.in.ua/course/view.php?id=75&lang=ru. (in Russian)

R. A. Ellisa, A. Pardob, and F. Hana, "Quality in blended learning environments – Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations", Computers & Education, vol. 102, pp. 90-102, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006/. (in English)

K. Lisetskyy "Blended and traditional forms of learning", the 7thInt. scientific and practical internet-conference. "Modern methods of teaching a foreign language of professional direction in higher education", Kyiv, 2013, pp. 223-235. (in Ukrainian)

Pavla Slechtova, Hana Vojackova, Jan Voracek, "Blended Learning: Promising Strategic Alternative in Higher Education", Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 171, pp. 1245-1254, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.238/. (in English)

V. Bensona, and A. Kolsakerb, "Instructor Approaches to Blended Learning: A Tale of Two Business Schools", The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 13, no.3, pp. 316-325, Oct. 2015, doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2015.10.001.(in English)

V Postnikov," Analysis of approaches to the formation of the structure of an expert group focused on the preparation and decision-making", Science and Education, vol. 5, pp. 333-346, May 2012, doi: 10.7463/0512.0360720. (in Russian)

L. Shelekhova, Mathematical Methods in Pedagogy and Psychology: in Schemas and Tables,Maykop, ASU, 2010. (in Russian)

Program IBM SPSS Statistics. Available:http://www.predictivesolutions.ru/software/statistics.htm.Accessed on: Mar. 2, 2016 (in Russian)

Published
2017-09-30
Section
ICT and learning tools in the higher education establishments