SUCCESS LEVEL OF A HYBRID TRAINING IN TEACHER EDUCATION: EXPERIENCES IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY
AbstractStudies show that blended learning promotes collaborative learning. However, blended learning is always a challenge when Internet infrastructure is limited. This paper describes the success levels of the 6-month blended learning course for teacher educators in four provinces in the central part of the Philippines. The blended training was aimed to increase the ability to add value to economic output by applying knowledge of school subjects to solve complex problems encountered in the real world situations of work and life. Success levels were measured using retention rate, Constructivist Online Learning Environment model, Online Environment Elements model, and New Kirkpatrick Model. Of the 60 registered teacher-trainees, only 15 completed the training. It was concluded that the blended training was evaluated very successfully.
EDUCAUSE. Blended learning. Retrieved November 3, 2017, from https://library.educause.edu/topics/teaching-and-learning/blended-learning, 2017.
UNESCO Bangkok. Blended Learning for Quality Higher Education: Selected Case Studies on Implementation from Asia-Pacific. Retrieved November 3, 2017 from http://bangkok.unesco.org/content/blended-learning-quality-higher-education-selected-case-studies-implementation-asia-pacific, Sep 25, 2017.
M. Trucano. Knowledge Maps: ICTs in Education. Washington, DC: infoDev / World Bank. Retrieved from November from http://www.infodev.org/articles/use-specific-ict-tools-education, 2005.
M. Kaur, Blended Learning - Its Challenges and Future, In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, ISSN 1877-0428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187704281303351X), vol 93, 612-617, 2013.
A. Majumdar. Organizational Blended Learning – Five Common Challenges and Solutions. Retrieved from https://www.gc-solutions.net/blog/organizational-blended-learning-five-common-challenges-and-solutions/, July 16, 2015.
P. Taylor & D. Maor. The Constructivist On-Line Learning Environment Survey (COLLES). Retrieved September 15, 2014, from A Free Tool to Help Teachers Survey Students: http://surveylearning.moodle.com/colles/
Florida Gulf Coast University. Evaluation of Online Course (based on Principles of Online Design. Retrieved September 16, 2014, from Principles of Online Design: http://www.fgcu.edu/onlinedesign/
B. Burnsed. Online Universities: Retention Rate Data. Retrieved September 20, 2014, from U.S. News & World Report LP: http://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/2010/10/22/online-universities-retention-rate-data, 2010.
D. Luzer. How Online College Could Hurt Graduation Rates. Retrieved September 21, 2014, from Washington Monthly: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/college_guide/blog/how_online_college_could_hurt.php#, 2012.
D. Koller, A. Ng, C. Do, & Z. Chen. Retention and Intention in Massive Open Online Courses: In Depth. Retrieved August 29, 2014, from EDUCAUSE Review Online: http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/retention-and-intention-massive-open-online-courses-depth-0, 2013.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.