Keywords: literacy, multimodal literacy, multiliteracies pedagogy, digital learning environment, multimodal essay, digital mapping project, undergraduate students


The paper presents a theoretical overview of the notion “multimodal literacy” in the context of the multiliteracies pedagogy focusing on the research relevant to developing notions of literacy for twenty-first century higher education standards. The relevance of the topic is explained by the fact that the modern world is becoming more and more pluralist and increasingly dependent on new technologies and different modes of communication, students require new transdisciplinary skills and methods of learning. The author examines the changing pattern of literacy as broad, multidimensional knowledge, skills and attitudes. Literacy is viewed as a personal sociocultural capacity the development of which provides every student with the rules how to solve problems, to relate to others and survive in diverse social settings, and creates numerous opportunities for enhancing critical thinking and reflection as well. The foundation for students’ multimodal literacy in the digital learning environment of a higher education institution through theoretical and applied frameworks of visual, media, information and multicultural literacy is considered. The diverse affordance of digital tools and range of multimodal genres offer engaging new avenues for students’ creative expression on the basis of developing multimodal literacy. It is emphasized that successful life in a world of multimodal information requires fluency in a broad range of literacies to consume and create texts in visual, audio, and written formats, to evaluate messages in a variety of mediums, and to gain sociocultural awareness and the ability to communicate and live in a global diverse society. Pedagogic techniques across disciplines (multimodal essay, digital mapping project) are highlighted in view of their effectiveness in developing multicultural literacy of undergraduate students. It is an empowering practice for modern educators to incorporate multimodal tasks into a diverse learning environment, which teaches critical thinking and multimodal skills, enhances audio-visual rhetoric, develops writing and oral communication skills, and aids in self-expression and self-reflection.

Author Biography

Svitlana V. Fedorenko, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of the Theory, Practice and Translation of the English language


M. Mackey. “Playing the text,” in The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Language and Literacy. T. Grainger, Ed. New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 2004, pp. 236-252. (in English)

D. Blake and V. Hanley. Dictionary of Educational Terms. Aldershot: Arena, 1995, pp. 89-97. (in English)

UNESCO Institute for Education. (2006, Feb.). Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2006. Literacy for Life. [online]. Available: http://www.unesco.org/education/gmr_download/consultation2006.pdf. Accessed on: May 18, 2018. (in English)

C. Cazden, B. Cope, N. Fairclough, J. Gee and et al. [New London Group]. “A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures.” Harvard Educational Review, vol. 66, pp. 60-92, Jan. 1996. (in English)

B. Cope and M. Kalantzis. “Multiliteracies: New Literacies, New Learning, Pedagogies.” An International Journal, vol. 4, 2009, pp. 164-195. (in English)

G. Kress and T. Van Leeuwen. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, UK: Edward Arnold, 2001, pp. 10-21. (in English)

C. Lankshear and M. Knobel. New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning. New York: McGaw Hill, 2006, pp. 15-19. (in English)

G. Kress and C. Jewitt. “Introduction,” in Multimodal literacy. C. Jewitt and G. Kress, Eds. New York: Peter Lang, 2003, pp. 1-18. (in English)

S. Cordes. (2009, May). “Broad Horizons: The Role of Multimodal Literacy in 21st Century Library Instruction.” World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and Assembly “Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage”. [online]. Available: http://conference.ifla.org/past-wlic/2009/94-cordes-en.pdf .Accessed on: May 18, 2018. (in English)

C. Jewitt, G. Kress, J. Ogborn and C. Tsatsarelis. Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetoric of the Science Classroom. New York: Continuum, 2001, pp. 5-20. (in English)

B. Williams and A. Zenger. Popular Culture and Representations of Literacy. London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 71-105. (in English)

G. Kress and T. Van Leeuwen. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York: Routledge, 2006, pp. 177-181. (in English)

J. L. Lemke. “Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media,” in Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World. D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo and R. D. Keiffer, Eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998, pp. 283-301. (in English)

J. Lave and E. Wenger. Siruared learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Universiry Press, 1991, pp. 63-82. (in English)

E. Wenger, R. McDermott and W. Synder. Cultivating communities of practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2002, pp. 54-120. (in English)

J. Martin. “Analysing genre: functional parameters,” in Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. F. Christie and J. Martin, Eds. London: Cassell, 1997, pp. 3-39. (in English)

M. Hocks. “Teaching and learning visual rhetoric,” in Teaching writing with computers: An introduction. P. Takayoshi and B. Huot, Eds. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2003, pp. 202-216. (in English)

C. Selfe. “Toward new media texts: Taking up the challenges of visual literacy,” in Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition. A. F. Wysocki, J. JohnsonEilola, C. Selfe and G. Sirc, Eds. Logan: Utah State Press, 2004, pp. 67-110. (in English)

C. Selfe and P. Takayoshi. “Thinking about multimodality,” in Multimodal composition: Resources for teachers. C. Selfe, Ed. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2007, pp. 1-12. (in English)

T. Cresswell. Place: A short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2004, pp. 11-40. (in English)

E. Jacobs. “Re(Place) Your Typical Writing Assignment: An Argument for Place-Based Writing.” English Journal, vol. 100, pp. 49-54, Jan. 2011. (in English)

B. VanMaele. “Digital Life Place Narratives.” [online]. Available: https://multimodalcomposition.wordpress.com/2011/02/06/defining-multimodal-composition/, Feb. 6, 2011. Accessed on: May 18, 2018. (in English)

A. Koh. “Introducing Digital Humanities Work to Undergraduates: An Overview.” [online]. Available: http://hybridpedagogy.org/introducing-digital-humanities-work-undergraduates-overview/, Aug. 14, 2014. Accessed on: May 18, 2018. (in English)

W. Fenton. “5 Digital Mapping Projects that Visualize Literature.” [online]. Available: https://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2490590,00.asp, Sep. 3, 2015. Accessed on: May 18, 2018. (in English)

Stanford University and the University of North Texas. “Mapping Texts.” [online]. Available: http://mappingtexts.org/index3b72.html?page_id=3, Sep., 2010.Accessed on: May 18, 2018. (in English)

The methodology, theory, philosophy and history of the use of ICT in education