• Alina P. Dzhurylo National Transport University, Kyiv
  • Oksana M. Shparyk Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Education Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7507-4950
Keywords: ICT competence for teachers, ICT competence for school students, general secondary education, foreign countries


The paper is focused on the role of ICT education as a key component in the education systems in EU, USA and Ukraine. The research results show that the use of ICT in education and training has been a priority in most European countries during the last decade. It has been determined that the possession of ICT-competency has been proclaimed an important component of successful schooling and lifelong learning, further professional development, effective management of the learning process, and the use of ICT in learning activities in a modern digital society. It has been revealed that in the European countries, the standards of ICT-competency are developed and implemented at all levels of education, the systems of mandatory monitoring and certification of ICT-competency of students, teachers and heads of general educational institutions are in operation. Results show that teachers mainly focus on the development of technical ICT skills, whereas the ICT curriculum centres on the integrated use of ICT within the learning and teaching process. Analysis of foreign experience on modern approaches to the assessment has shown that the assessment of the pupils’ ICT competency in Ukraine is extremely important in the context of modern reforms, since in Ukraine standards for assessing ICT-competency are valid only within the subject “Informatics” at the level of secondary school, while the worldwide tendency is the end-to-end using of assessment tools for students' ICT-competency. Inference should be drawn that building digital competence by embedding and learning ICT should start as early as possible, i.e. in primary education, by learning to use digital tools critically, confidently and creatively, with attention paid to security, safety, and privacy. Teachers need to be equipped with the digital competence themselves, in order to support this process. The authors of the paper made conclusion about the necessity for Ukraine both to study the progressive European experience and to synchronize the education policy in ICT-education with the strategies of the EU and the member states.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alina P. Dzhurylo, National Transport University, Kyiv
PhD of Pedagogical Sciences, Department of Foreign Philology and Translation, Associate Professor
Oksana M. Shparyk, Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Education Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
PhD of Pedagogical Sciences, Comparative Education Department, Senior Staff Scientist


M. Zhaldak, “Problems of Informatization of Educational Process in Secondary and Higher Educational Iinstitutions,” Computer at School and in Family, no. 3, pp. 8–15, 2013. [online]. Available: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/komp_2013_3_3. (in Ukrainian).

O. Ovcharuk et al., Competency Approach in Modern Education: World Experience and Ukrainian Perspectives: Library for Educational Policy. Kiev, Ukraine: “К.І.С.”, 2004. (in Ukrainian).

O. Belous et al., Formation of Information and Communication Competencies in the Context of EuroIntegration Processes of Creation of Information Educational Spaces. Kiev, Ukraine: Atika, 2014. (in Ukrainian).

Eurostat. Strategy “Europe 2020”. [online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm. (in English).

K. Ala-Mutka, Y. Punie, C. Redecker, Digital Competence for Lifelong Learning. Seville, Spain: Edificio Expo. c/ Inca Garcilaso, 2008 [online]. Available: http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=1820. (in English).

I. Malitska, “The Phenomenon of Virtual Educational Communities in the Educational Systems of Foreign Countries: Approaches to the Definition of Concepts”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 4, no. 30, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://ite.kspu.edu/webfm_send/485. (in Ukrainian).

V. Bykov et al., Fundamentals of Standardization of Information and Communication Competences in the Ukrainian Education System: Methodical Recommendations. Kiev, Ukraine: Atika, 2010. (in Ukrainian).

Eurydice Network. Key Data on Learning and Innovation through ICT at School in Europe 2011. [online]. Available: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice. (in English).

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). Innovative Learning Environments (ILE). [online]. Available: http://www.oecd.org/edu/learningenvironments. (in English).

V. Bykov et al., Assessment of Information and Communication Competence of Pupils and Teachers in the Conditions of European Integration Pocesses in Education. Kiev, Ukraine: “Pedahohichna Dumka”, 2011. (in Ukrainian).

R. Vuorikari, Y. Punie, S. Carretero Gomez, G. Van den Brande, DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model. Luxembourg Publication Offi ce of the European Union, 2016, 44 p. (in English).

European Commission. Final Study Report. (February 2013). Survey of Schools: ICT in Education Benchmarking access, use and attitudes to technology in Europe’s schools 2013. [online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/sites/digital-agenda/fi les/KK-31-13-401-EN-N.pdf. (in English).

UNESCO. ICT Competency Framework for Teachers, ICTCFT. [online]. Available: http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/ru/files/3214694.pdf. (in English).

The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy. [online]. Available: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR2016/WEF_GITR_Full_Report.pdf. (in English).

O. Furman, A. Kostyuchenko, “Formation of Information and Communication Competence by Means of ICT in Vocational Training of Subject Teachers”, Humanitarian Bulletin of the State Higher Educational Institution “Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky State Pedagogical University named after G. S. Skovoroda”. Pedagogy. Psychology. Philosophy, no. 28(1), pp. 298–303, 2013. [online]. Available: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/gvpdpu_2013_28_1_58. (in Ukrainian).

L. Markauskaite, N. Goodwin, D. Reid, P. Reimann, Modelling and Evaluating ICT Cources for Pre-service Teachers: What Works and How It Works? Informatics Education. The Bridge between Using and Understanding Computers. Vilnus, Lithuania: ISSEP, pp. 242–254, 2006. (in English).

Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction ITLS: Overview of Information and Technology Literacy Wisconsin’s Model Academic Standards for Information & Technology Literacy. [online]. Available: https://dpi.wi.gov/imt/it-literacy-standards. (in English).

The International Society for Technology in Education. National Educational Technology Standards (NETS•T) Performance Indicators for Teachers. [online]. Available: http://courses.edtechleaders.org/documents/NETSAdminTeachers.pdf. (in English).

D. Bawden, “Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts”, Journal of Documentation, vol. 57 Issue: 2, pp. 218–259, 2001. [online]. Available: http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/105803/1/bawden.pdf?origin.(in English).

The Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. National Qualifications Framework of Ukraine. [online]. Available: http://www.mim.hneu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/%D0%9D%D0%A0%D0%9A.pdf. (in Ukrainian).

M. Zhaldak, “Teacher Training System for the Use of Information Technology in the Educational Process”, Dissertation in the Form of the Scientific Report of the Doctor of Ped. Sciences: 13.00.02 APN of the USSR; Research Institute of Content and Teaching Methods. Moskow, 48 p., 1989. (in Russian).

How to Cite
Dzhurylo, A. P., & Shparyk, O. M. (2019). ICT COMPETENCE FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF EDUCATION INFORMATIZATION: GLOBAL EXPERIENCE AND CHALLENGES FOR UKRAINE. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 70(2), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v70i2.2438
ICT and learning tools in secondary education