USING THE MEANS OF COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PROCESS OF EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH OF THE STUDENTS' EMOTIVE-ESTIMATE RELATION TO DIFFERENT FORMS OF TEST TASKS IN UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE

  • Antonina V. Hryvko Institute of Pedagogics of National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
  • Yurii O. Zhuk Institute of Pedagogics of National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
Keywords: test, answer forms, task forms, test results, semantic differential method, evaluation

Abstract

The article reflects the results of one of the stages of the study, which is connected with determining the characteristics of the influence of various factors on the effective test scores. In particular, the connection between the respondents' emotionally-estimated attitude to various forms of responses to test tasks and the results of their implementation is examined. The proposed study was conducted with using of the authors' tests in the field of Ukrainian language. To determine the generalized students' assessment of the forms of answers, proposed in these tests, we used questionnaire, developed according to the method of semantic differential, which allowed to build a profile of the characteristics of the test in accordance with the semantic cognitive space of the sample. The results of respondents' assessment of response forms are generally correlated with test results and can be an additional explanatory element of their analysis and a prognostic element in the process of further designing and applying the tests. The use of factor analysis of the research results allowed: 1) to draw conclusions about the influence of the response forms offered in the test on the respondents' general perception of test tasks regardless of its content; 2) to justify the assumption that the form of test tasks and answers, as an externally organized test constructs, are a sensory afferent stimulus of the operational imagination of the activity, which, in particular, is expressed in the formation of interest and motivation to doing an assignment. An analysis of the respondents' generalized perception of the separate forms of answers showed the need for combining various forms of test tasks and the forms of answers they defined, both for the formation of positive attitudes and the motivational optimum in the process of their implementation, and for verification and refinement the test results.

Author Biographies

Antonina V. Hryvko, Institute of Pedagogics of National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
PhD of Pedagogical Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Department of Monitoring and Quality Assessment of General Secondary Education
Yurii O. Zhuk, Institute of Pedagogics of National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Head of the Department of Monitoring and Quality Assessment of General Secondary Education

References

“Закон України «Про освіту»”, Відомості Верховної Ради (ВВР), № 38 – 39, c. 380, 2017. [Електронний ресурс].Доступно: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19. Дата звернення: Серпень, 8, 2018.

В. С. Аванесов, Композиция тестовых заданий, М., Центр тестирования, 2002, 239 с.

К. Д. Дятлова, “Исследование влияния разнообразия форм тестовых заданий на статистические характеристики теста”, Вопросы тестирования в образовании, № 4, с. 65 – 75, 2006.

И. П. Карпова, “Сравнение открытых и выборочных тестов”, Открытое образование, №3, c. 32 – 38, 2010.

Bauer C. F., “Attitude toward chemistry: a semantic differential instrument for assessing curriculum impacts”, J. Chem. Educ., 85, 1440-1445, 2015.

Жук Ю. О., “Образ шкільного підручника в уявленні старшокласників”, Проблеми сучасного підручника, № 16, с. 148 – 166, 2016.

Klement М. et al. The use of the semantic differential method in identifying the opininons of university students on education realized through e-learning, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186, 1214 – 1223, 2015.

Литвинова С. Г., “Семантичний диференціал як метод наукового дослідження хмаро орієнтованого навчального середовища ЗНЗ”, Науковий вісник Мелітопольського державного педагогічного університету, № 2 (13), с. 147 – 157.

П. К. Анохин, Узловые вопросы теории функциональной системы, М., Наука, 1980, 197 с.

Д. А. Ошанин, Предметное действие и оперативный образ: избр. психол. тр., М., Моск. психол.-соц. ин-т; Воронеж: Изд.-во НПО "МОДЭК", 1999, 512 с.

И. И. Ильясов, “Психологические и физиологические методы психолингвистического исследования”, Основы теории речевой деятельности / Под ред. А. А. Леонтьева. М., Наука, 1974, c. 106 – 128.

А. М. Эткинд, “Опыт теоретической интерпретации семантического дифференциала”, Вопросы психологии, № 1, c. 17 – 27, 1979.


REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

“Law of Ukraine «On Education»”, Information from the Verkhovna Rada, № 38 – 39, p. 380, 2017. [online]. Available: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19. Accessed on: Aug, 8, 2018 (in Ukrainian).

V. S. Avanesov, The composition of test assignments, М., Tsentr testirovaniya, 2002, 239 p. (in Russian).

K. D. Djatlova, “Investigation of the influence of the forms variety of test tasks on the statistical characteristics of the test”, Voprosyi testirovaniya v obrazovanii, № 4, p. 65 – 75, 2006 (in Russian).

I. P. Karpova, “Comparison of open and sample tests”, Otkryitoe obrazovanie, №3, p. 32 – 38, 2010 (in Russian).

Bauer C. F., “Attitude toward chemistry: a semantic differential instrument for assessing curriculum impacts”, J. Chem. Educ., 85, 1440-1445, 2015 (in English).

Zhuk Yu. O., “ The image of a school textbook in the presentation of senior pupils ”, Problemy` suchasnogo pidruchny`ka, № 16, p. 148 – 166, 2016 (in Ukrainian).

Klement М. et al. The use of the semantic differential method in identifying the opininons of university students on education realized through e-learning, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186, 1214 – 1223, 2015 (in English).

Ly`tvy`nova S. G., “Semantic differential as a method of scientific research for cloud-oriented learning environment at the secondary school (COLE)”, Naukovy`j visny`k Melitopol`s`kogo derzhavnogo pedagogichnogo universy`tetu, № 2 (13), p. 147 – 157 (in Ukrainian).

P. K. Anohin, Nodal questions in the theory of a functional system, М., Nauka, 1980, 197 p. (in Russian).

D. A. Oshanin, Objective action and operational image: selected psychological works, М., Moscow Psychological and Social Institute; Voronezh: NPO "MODJeK", 1999, 512 p. (in Russian).

I. I. Il'jasov, “Psychological and physiological methods of psycholinguistic research”, Fundamentals of the theory of speech activity / Edited by A. A. Leont'eva. М., Nauka, 1974, p. 106 – 128 (in Russian).

A. M. Jetkind, “Experience of the theoretical interpretation of the semantic differential”, Voprosyi psihologii, № 1, p. 17 – 27, 1979 (in Russian).

Published
2019-04-27
Section
ICT to support psychological and educational research