CRITERIA AND INDICATORS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION COMPETENCE DIAGNOSTICS DEVELOPMENT FOR TEACHERS IN MILITARY EDUCATION SYSTEM

Keywords: teacher, development, information and communication technologies, information and communication competence, criteria, indexes, diagnostics, system of military education

Abstract

Criteria and indicators of information and communication competence diagnostics development of teachers in the system of military education are substantiated. The selection of the relevant criteria and indicators is made taking into account the specifics of implementation the teachers scientific and pedagogical functions with the use of information and communication technologies in relation to professional training of officer personnel in higher military education institutions, as well as research tasks set forth in our research. Taking into account the content and specifics of pedagogical activity in the system of military education, the peculiarities of teaching general-military and military-specific disciplines, five criteria are pointed out: value, motivational, cognitive, technological, functional and reflexive, which in full give the opportunity to cover the information and communication competence content and fully enough to diagnose both its formation and development. In particular, these criteria make possible to find out the values of scientific and pedagogical activity with the use of information and communication technologies and the motivation to develop the teacher’s information and communication competence who is as a subject of pedagogical being in the system of military education. Knowledge of the theory of information and communication technologies and methods of their application in the process of teaching specific educational disciplines in the system of military education; knowledge of theoretical foundations of analysis and decision making in military affairs; knowledge of technology for modeling processes, for example, organization and combat units and types of troops; knowledge of the theoretical positions of cybersecurity in the process of using information and communication technologies in the military sphere; knowledge of modern hardware and software; knowledge of software development tools; the ability of the teacher to systematically use information and communication technologies for solving various vocational and pedagogical tasks in accordance with the goals and methods of teaching specific general-military and military-special disciplines; the ability to develop and use modern hardware and software for the implementation of pedagogical functions and their verification for cybernetic vulnerability; the ability to develop information software for use in teaching specific general military and military-special disciplines; the ability to synthesize various software tools for improving the efficiency of scientific and pedagogical activities; ability to use ICT in scientific and pedagogical activity; scientific and pedagogical subjectivity and the ability to objective self-evaluation as a subject of the information society and pedagogical activity in the system of military education. It is shown that these criteria and their indicators provide the opportunity to obtain empirical data on the prediction of the results of our research and to find out the main pedagogical aspects of creating the author’s technology for the development of teachers’ information and communication competence in the military education system.

Author Biographies

Vasyl V. Yahupov, National Defense University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi, Kyiv
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Social Sciences
Vladyslav Yu. Kyva, National Defense University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi, Kyiv
National Defense University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi, Kyiv

References

В. Ю. Кива, «Розвиток інформаційно-комунікаційної компетентності викладачів системи військової освіти як методологічна проблема», Адаптивне управління: теорія і практика. Серія «Педагогіка, №5 (9), с. 1-20, 2018. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://amtp.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/20/17. Дата звернення: Січень 28, 2019.

J. L. L. Cantabrana, M. U. Rodriguez, M. G. Cervera, “Assessing Teacher Digital Competence: the Construction of an Instrument for Measuring the Knowledge of Pre-Service Teachers”, Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, № 8(1), pp. 73-78. 2019. (in English).

D. R. Carless, G. R. Joughin, M. M. C. Mok “Learning-oriented assessment: principles and practice”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, № 31(4), pp. 395-398, 2006. (in English).

A. V. Sanchez, M. P. Ruiz, “Evaluacion de competencias genéricas: principios, oportunidades y limitaciones”, Bordon. Revista de Pedagogia, № 63(1), pp. 147-170, 2011.

A. Calvani, A. Cartelli, A. Fini, M. Ranieri, “Models and Instruments for assessing Digital Competence at School”, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, № 4(3), pp. 183-193, 2008.

S. Hooper, L. P. Rieber, “Teaching: Theory into practice”, A. Ornstein. Boston: MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 154–170, 1995.

S. Carretero, R. Vuorikari, Y. Punie, “DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use”, [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc106281. Дата звернення: Січень 28, 2019.

H. Poldoja, T. Valjataga, M. Laanpere, K. Tammets, “Web-based self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ digital competencies”, World Wide Web, pp 255–269, 2014. Doi:10.1007/s11280-012-0176-2.

А. Б. Кочарян, «Розвиток інформаційно-комунікаційної компетентності науково-педагогічних працівників гуманітарних спеціальностей класичних університетів», дис. …канд. пед. наук, Інститут інформаційних технологій і засобів навчання НАПН України, Київ, Україна, 2016.

В. В. Ягупов, О. Й. Фурс, «Особливості діагностування психічної саморегуляції у майбутніх фахівців екстремальних видів діяльності», Організаційна психологія. Економічна психологія, № 1(12), с. 116-123, 2018. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно:http://orgpsy-journal.in.ua/userfiles/issues/i12/n12/14.pdf. Дата звернення: Січень 28, 2019.

В. В. Яременко, О. М. Сліпушко, Новий тлумачний словник української мови, Київ, Україна: Аконіт, 2001.

С. У. Гончаренко, Український педагогічний словник, Київ, Україна: Либідь, 1997.

С. В. Іванова, «Критерії та показники розвитку професійної компетентності вчителів біології в закладах післядипломної педагогічної освіти», Вісник Житомирського державного університету. Педагогічні науки, № 52, с. 152-156, 2010. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/4463/1/vip_52_35.pdf. Дата звернення: Січень 28, 2019.

О. М. Спірін, Т. А. Вакалюк, «Критерії добору відкритих web-opiєнтованих технологій навчання основ програмування майбутніх учителів інформатики», Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, № 60 (4), с. 275-287, 2017. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ITZN_2017_60_4_24. Дата звернення: Січень 28, 2019.

В. Г. Кремень, В. Ю. Биков, «Інноваційні завдання сучасного етапу інформатизації освіти», Сучасні інформаційні технології та інноваційні методики навчання у підготовці фахівців: методологія, теорія, досвід, проблеми, № 37, с. 3-15, 2014. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://vspu.edu.ua/science/art/a153.pdf. Дата звернення: Січень 28, 2019.

О. О. Резван, Формування професійно-рефлексивної позиції майбутніх фахівців автомобільно-дорожньої галузі, монографія, Харків, Україна: Точка, 2014.


REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

V. Y. Kyva, “The development of information and communication competence of teachers of the system of military education as a methodological problem”, Adaptive management: theory and practice. Series Pedagogy, №5 (9), pp. 1-20, 2018. [online]. Available: https://amtp.org.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/20/17. Accessed on: Jan. 28, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

J. L. L. Cantabrana, M. U. Rodriguez, M. G. Cervera, “Assessing Teacher Digital Competence: the Construction of an Instrument for Measuring the Knowledge of Pre-Service Teachers”, Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, № 8(1), pp. 73-78. 2019. (in English).

D. R. Carless, G. R. Joughin, M. M. C. Mok “Learning-oriented assessment: principles and practice”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, № 31(4), pp. 395-398, 2006. (in English).

A. V. Sanchez, M. P. Ruiz, “Evaluación de competencias genéricas: principios, oportunidades y limitaciones”, Bordon. Revista de Pedagogia, № 63(1), pp. 147-170, 2011. (in English).

A. Calvani, A. Cartelli, A. Fini, M. Ranieri, “Models and Instruments for assessing Digital Competence at School”, Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, № 4(3), pp. 183-193, 2008. (in English)

S. Hooper, L. P. Rieber, “Teaching: Theory into practice”, A. Ornstein. Boston: MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 154–170, 1995. (in English)

S. Carretero, R. Vuorikari, Y. Punie, “DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use”, [online]. Available : https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc106281. Accessed on: Jan. 28, 2019. (in English).

H. Poldoja, T. Valjataga, M. Laanpere, K. Tammets, “Web-based self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ digital competencies”, World Wide Web, pp 255–269, 2014, doi:10.1007/s11280-012-0176-2. (in English).

A. B. Kocharian, “Development of information and communication competence of scientific and pedagogical workers of humanitarian specialties of classical universities”, diss. Cand. ped Sciences, Institute of Information Technologies and Training of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraina, 2016. (in Ukrainian).

V. V. Yahupov, O. Y. Furs, “Features of diagnosis of psychic self-regulation in future specialists of extreme activities”, Organizational psychology. Economic psychology, № 1(12), pp. 116-123, 2018. (in Ukrainian).

V. V. Yaremenko, O. M. Slipushko, New Explanatory Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language, Kyiv, Ukraina: Akonit, 2001. (in Ukrainian).

S. U. Honcharenko, Ukrainian Pedagogical Dictionary, Kyiv, Ukraina: Lybid, 1997. (in Ukrainian).

S. V. Ivanova, “Criteria and indicators of development of professional competence of teachers of biology in institutions of postgraduate pedagogical education”, Bulletin of Zhytomyr State University. Pedagogical sciences, № 52, pp. 152-156, 2010. [online]. Available: http://eprints.zu.edu.ua/4463/1/vip_52_35.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 28, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

O. M. Spirin, T. A. Vakaliuk, “Criteria for the selection of open web-oriented technologies for the study of the basics of programming of future teachers of computer science”, Information technology and teaching aids, № 60 (4), pp. 275-287, 2017. [online]. Available: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ITZN_2017_60_4_24. Accessed on: Jan. 28, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

V. H. Kremen, V. Y. Bykov, “Innovative tasks of the modern stage of informatization of education”, Modern Information Technologies and Innovative Methods of Training in the Training of Specialists: Methodology, Theory, Experience, Problems, № 37, pp. 3-15, 2014. [online]. Available: https://vspu.edu.ua/science/art/a153.pdf. Accessed on: Jan. 28, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

O. O. Rezvan, Formation of professionally reflexive position of future specialists of the automobile and road industry, monohrafiia, Kharkiv, Ukraina: Tochka, 2014. (in Ukrainian).

Published
2019-06-29
Section
ICT and learning tools in the sphere of post-graduate education