USE OF DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES IN THE PROCESS OF JUDGES’ PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
PDF (Ukrainian)

Keywords

National School of Judges of Ukraine
training of judges
distance learning
clickers
website
digital technology

How to Cite

[1]
A. N. Masliuk and I. N. Yevchenko, “USE OF DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES IN THE PROCESS OF JUDGES’ PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT”, ITLT, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 32–45, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v82i2.3604.

Abstract

The article substantiates the expediency of using digital technologies in the educational activities of the National School of Judges of Ukraine. The features of using the latest digital technologies in the training of judges are clarified. The traditional approach to training is not an effective mechanism in ensuring the educational space of judges, therefore, an interactive educational model of training was chosen, where digital technologies prevail over traditional methods. It was clarified that the system of training judges at the National School of Judges of Ukraine is in line with full-time and distance learning. An important component of the training is digital content (website, YouTube channel, Facebook page). The distance learning training platform is quite simple and understandable for judges who adjust training to their work schedule, as they have constant access to training resources. Distance courses have a high level of interactivity, which allows judges to share their thoughts with other participants and the moderator of the course. An electronic library has been created on the website of the National School of Judges of Ukraine, which contains electronic scientific aids that are modern, relevant and respond to requests from judicial practice. The features of innovative special training, which, in fact, was the embodiment of the best domestic and foreign experience, are analyzed. It was clarified that during the training it is appropriate to use the clicker system for promptly interviewing candidates for the position of judge in order to obtain information about the group's views on a specific issue. The use of electronic training tools leveled the interference of the human factor during the assessment, which could be biased towards the candidates for the position of judge by the trainers, significantly reduced the time for processing the results of academic performance and placed the participants in the educational process on an equal footing.

PDF (Ukrainian)

References

G. Radu, O. Pacurari, “Vocational and Continuous Training of Judges and Prosecutors: A Comparative Analysis” in Langbroek P. et al. (eds.) Legal Education and Judicial Training in Europe: The Menu for Justice Project Report, Eleven International Publishing, pp. 15–198, 2013.

Положення про дистанційне навчання. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0703-13. Дата звернення: Жовт. 10, 2019.

О. Ю. Буров, “Технології та інновації в діяльності людини ери інформації: проблеми інформації та технології”, Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, № 5 (49), с. 16–25, 2015. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1274. Дата звернення: Жовт. 10, 2019.

В. Ю. Биков, “Технології хмарних обчислень, ІКТ-аутсорсінг та нові функції ІКТ-підрозділів навчальних закладів і наукових установ”, Інформаційні технології в освіті, вип. 10, с. 8–23, 2011.

С. С. Єсімов, “Правове регулювання застосування інформаційних технологій для формування довіри до органів державної влади”, Науковий вісник Львівського держ. ун-ту внутрішніх справ. Юридичний, № 1, с. 173–184, 2015.

P. Traversa, S. Ggamsjäger “The Training of Judges and Legal Practitioners”, 2017. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://cutt.ly/Xbjui8Z. Дата звернення: Жовт. 10, 2019.

D. W. Catlin, The Relationship between Selected Characteristics of Judges and their Reasons for Participating in Continuing Professional Education, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan, USA: Michigan State University, 1981.

Т. Бочаров, А. Дмитриева, Д. Скугаревский, Профессиональное образование судей : Сравнительный анализ центров подготовки судей в Европе (Франция, Португалия, Польша) (Серия «Аналитические обзоры по проблемам правоприменения»). СПб, Россия: ИПП ЕУСПб, 2018. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://cutt.ly/dbjuaoo. Дата звернення: Лист. 10, 2019.

L. Armytage, Judges as learners. Reflections on principle and practice, 2004. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://www.iojt.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/IOJT/Microsite/Judges-as-Learners-Reflections-on-Principle-Practice.ashx. Дата звернення: Листоп.10.2019.

D. Richards, Current models of judicial training: an updated review of initial and continuous training models across Western democratic jurisdictions. Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training 5, рр. 41–52, 2016.

Л. Р. Сердюк, “Електронне судочинство через призму верховенства права: окремі питання теорії й практики”, Науковий вісник Херсон. держ. ун-ту. Юридичний, вип. 1, т. 4, с. 126–129, 2016.

Ст. 105. Завдання Національної школи суддів України Закону України “Про судоустрій і статус суддів” від 02.06.2016 № 1402-VIII. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://kodeksy.com.ua/pro_sudoustrij_i_status_suddiv/statja-105.htm. Дата звернення: Жовт.10.2019.

Офіційний YouTube-канал Національної школи суддів України. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkKQO-p9tvayzAbWyCNCQ3A. Дата звернення: Жовт.10.2019.

Офіційна сторінка соціальної мережі Facebook Національної школи суддів України. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.facebook.com/nsj.gov.ua/. Дата звернення: Жовт.10.2019.

Г. В. Савченко, А. М. Маслюк, “Методичні матеріали до тренінгу “Соціономічна компетентність судді”, Київ, Україна: Абріс Прінт, 2019. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://cutt.ly/fbjufmK Дата звернення: Жовт.10.2019.

О. О. Кабиш, “Українська мова в судово-процесуальній сфері”, Київ, Україна: Алерта, 2019. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://cutt.ly/zbjujpA. Дата звернення: Жовт.10.2019.

Концепція національних стандартів суддівської освіти в Україні. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://nsj.gov.ua/ua/about/symbols/. Дата звернення: Жовт.10.2019.


REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

G. Radu, O. Pacurari, “Vocational and Continuous Training of Judges and Prosecutors: A Comparative Analysis” in Langbroek P. et al. (eds.) Legal Education and Judicial Training in Europe: The Menu for Justice Project Report, Eleven International Publishing, pp. 15–198, 2013. (in English).

Regulations on distance learning. [Online]. Available: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0703-13. Accessed on: Oct.10, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

O. Yu. Burov, “Technology and innovation in human activity era: challenges and information technology,” Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 5 (49), pp. 16–25, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1274. Accessed on: Oct.10, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

V. Yu. Bykov, “Cloud computing technologies, ICT outsourcing and new functions of ICT departments of educational institutions and research institutions”, Information Technologies in Education, vol. 10, pp. 8–23, 2011. (in Ukrainian).

S. S. Yesimov, “Legal regulation of the use of information technologies for the formation of trust in public authorities”, Scientific Bulletin of Lviv State University of Internal Affairs. Legal, no. 1, pp. 173–184, 2015. (in Ukrainian)

P. Traversa, S. Ggamsjäger “The Training of Judges and Legal Practitioners”, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://cutt.ly/Xbjui8Z. Accessed on: Oct.10, 2019. (in English).

D. W. Catlin, The Relationship between Selected Characteristics of Judges and their Reasons for Participating in Continuing Professional Education, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan, USA: Michigan State University, 1981. (in English).

T. Bocharov, A. Dmitrieva, D. Skugarevsky, Professional Education of Judges: Comparative Analysis of Judicial Training Centers in Europe (France, Portugal, Poland) (Series “Analytical Reviews on the Problems of Law Enforcement”). SPb, Russia: IPP EUSPb, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://cutt.ly/dbjuaoo. Accessed on: Nov. 10, 2019. (in Russian).

L. Armytage, Judges as learners. Reflections on principle and practice, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.iojt.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/IOJT/Microsite/Judges-as-Learners-Reflections-on-Principle-Practice.ashx. Accessed on: Nov.10, 2019. (in English).

D. Richards, Current models of judicial training: an updated review of initial and continuous training models across Western democratic jurisdictions. Journal of the International Organization for Judicial Training, no. 5, рр. 41–52, 2016. (in English).

L. R. Serdyuk, "Electronic litigation through the prism of the rule of law: some issues of theory and practice", Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Legal, vol. 1, t. 4, рр. 126–129, 2016. (in Ukrainian).

Article 105. Tasks of the National School of Judges of Ukraine of the Law of Ukraine “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges” of June 2, 2016 vol. 1402-VIII. [Online]. Available: https://kodeksy.com.ua/pro_sudoustrij_i_status_suddiv/statja-105.htm. Accessed on: Oct.10, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

The official YouTube-channel National School of Judges of Ukraine. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkKQO-p9tvayzAbWyCNCQ3A. Accessed on: Oct.10, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

Official Facebook page of the National School of Judges of Ukraine. [Online]. Available: https://www.facebook.com/nsj.gov.ua/. Accessed on: Oct.10, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

H. V. Savchenko, A. N. Masliuk, “Methodical materials for the training “Socionomic competence of a judge”, Kyiv, Ukraine: Abris Print, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://cutt.ly/fbjufmK. Accessed on: Oct.10, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

O. O. Kabysh, “Ukrainian language in the judicial process”, Kyiv, Ukraine: Alert, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://cutt.ly/zbjujpA. Accessed on: Oct.10, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

The concept of national standards of judicial education in Ukraine. [Online]. Available: http://nsj.gov.ua/ua/about/symbols/. Accessed on: Oct.10, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
  2. The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.

Content Licensing

  1. Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.

Deposit Policy

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
  4. Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.