smart technologies, English for Specific Purposes, Master’s Degree students majoring in Public Administration, clicker systems


This study experimentally verifies how the ESP learning environment supported by the use of clickers influences learners’ academic motivation, academic self-efficacy, cognitive reflection, speed of decision making, functioning of a dominant brain type, and performance in learning English for specific purposes. This research relies on mixed methods and focuses on clickers like Kahoot and Socrative. The entry and outcome data were obtained through Rasch’s measurement model that was used to measure academic motivation, Byrne and Matotti-designed academic confidence measurement techniques used to measure academic self-efficacy, Frederick’s methodology for diagnosing cognitive reflection and decision making, a comprehensive ESP test consisting of the listening, reading, speaking and writing sections and Attitude/motivation test battery to measure shifts in the functioning of the students’ dominant brain type used to perform them. Those measurements were considered as dependent variables for this study. At the post-experimental stage, both a focus-group semi-structured interview and numerical and qualitative data analyses were carried out to validate the statistical significance of the experiment outcomes. Furthermore, a two-way ANOVA was used to define the dependence of the above-mentioned variables on the use of clickers. The data processing procedure relied on the application of free Two-Way ANOVA Statistics Software (Calculator) for non-commercial (academic) use. The responses of the focus group participants were processed under the guidelines for focus group research. This study found that integration of clicker systems as a type of smart technology into teaching English for Specific Purposes to Master’s Degree students majoring in Public Administration (in civil protection) is effective, as it triggers the students’ desire to learn, creates a relaxed environment, develops students’ cognitive sphere, and enhances students’ academic performance. Additionally, the results of the experiment suggest that due to clickers, language learning turns into a challenging experience allowing students to consolidate their knowledge and master their skills in information search and processing. The paper states that this teaching approach is student-centered, which reduces the teacher’s dominance and gives way to the student’s autonomy.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kateryna I. Shykhnenko, Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection

PhD of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Language Training


S. Dawson, “Seeing” the learning community: An exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking”, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 41(5), pp. 736–752, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00970.x (in English).

A. Mofareh A., “The Use of Technology in English Language Teaching”, Frontiers in Education Technology, vol. 2 (3), 2019, pp.168-180. doi: (in English).

V. Murugappan, D. Bhattacharyya, and T. Kim, “Research Study on Significance of Gamification Learning and i-Campus Using Internet of Things Technology-Enabled Infrastructure”, IntechOpen, 2018. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: February 8, 2020 (in English).

R. Dashtestani, and N. Stojković, “The use of technology in English for specific purposes (ESP) instruction: A literature review”, The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 3(3), pp. 435-456, 2015 (in English).

M. R. Ahmadi, “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review”, International Journal of Research in English Education, vol. 3 (2), 2018. doi: (in English).

L. Woodrow, B. Paltridge, and S. Starfield, Introducing Course Design in English for Specific Purposes, 2018. London: Routledge. doi: (in English).

M. Asmalı, “Integrating Technology into ESP Classes: Use Of Student Response System In English For Specific Purposes Instruction”, Teaching English with Technology, vol. 18(3), pp. 86-104, 2018. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: February 8, 2020 (in English).

J. Kuznekoff, and S. Titsworth, “The Impact of Mobile Phone Usage on Student Learning”, Communication Education, 62(3), pp. 233-252, 2013. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2013.767917 (in English).

N. Azmi, “Smart Phones In ESP Classes: Redefining The Powers Of ‘Humanware’, British Journal of Education, vol.6 (12), pp.69-78, 2018 (in English).

B. Christiansen, and E. Turkina, Applied Psycholinguistics and Multilingual Cognition in Human Creativity, 2019. doi: (in English).

P. Chliaras, “Implementing new technologies as instructional models into English for specific purposes classes”, Journal of International Association of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language English for Specific Purposes Special Interest Group, vol. 44, pp. 8-11, 2014 (in English).

M. Shevchenko, “Multimedia as an ESP teaching aid at technical universities”, ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, vol. 4-8, 2017. doi: 10.15587/2519-4984.2017.100042 (in English).

J. Buendgens-Kosten, “Authenticity”, ELT Journal, 68 (4), pp. 457–459, 2014. doi: (in English).

L. Alvareli, M. C. Bento, and N. Aparecida, “A student look on the use of virtual learning environment tools in the face to face teaching-learning”, in Proc. 13th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), pp. 1-5, 2018, doi: 10.23919/CISTI.2018.8399198. [Online]. Available: document/8399198. Accessed on: February 20, 2020 (in English).

J. E. Caldwell, “Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips”, CBE life sciences education, vol. 6 (1), pp. 9–20, 2007, doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-12-0205 (in English).

D. Harrison, “Clickers: A study of Classroom Response System use at the University of Toronto. Physics”, LibreTexts. Pedagogy, 2019. [Online]. Available: Math_Methods_and_Pedagogy/Pedagogy/Clickers%3A_A_study_of_Classroom_Response_System_use_at_the_University_of_Toronto. Accessed on: February 20, 2020 (in English).

A. Anbazhagan, and S. Govindarajan, Brain-Based Teaching Approach In Science ‒ A New Paradigm Of Teaching”, Review of Research, vol.7, issue 11, 2018. ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: February 23, 2020 (in English).

M. Francomacaro, “The added value of teaching CLIL for ESP and subject teachers”, International Journal of Language Studies, vol. 13, Issue 4, pp. 55-72, 2019. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: February 23, 2020 (in English).

P. Buckley, S. Noonan, C. Geary, T. Mackessy, and E., Nagle, “An Empirical Study of Gamification Frameworks”, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 31(1), pp. 22-38, 2019. doi:10.4018/JOEUC.2019010102 (in English).

A. Siani, “BYOD strategies in higher education: current knowledge, students’ perspectives, and challenges”, New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 12, 2017, ResearchGate. [Online]. Available: _current_knowledge_students'_perspectives_and_challenges . Accessed on: February 23, 2020 (in English).

A. Shukla, “Brain-Based Learning: Theory, Strategies, And Concepts”, Cognition Today, 2019. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: February 23, 2020 (in English).

E. Gozuyesil, and A. Dikici, “The effect of Brain-Based Learning on academic achievement: A Meta-analytical study”, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practices, 14(2), pp. 642-648, 2014. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: February 23, 2020 (in English).

J. N. Njiru, “Measuring academic motivation to achieve for high school students using a Rasch measurement model”, M.S. thesis, Faculty of Community Services, Education and Social Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia, November, 2003. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: February 23, 2020 (in English).

V. Sachitra, and U. Bandara, “Measuring the Academic Self-Efficacy of Undergraduates: The Role of Gender and Academic Year Experience”, International Science Index, Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, vol:11, 2017. [Online]. Available: Measuring_the_Academic_Self-Efficacy_of_Undergraduates_The_Role_of_Gender_and_Academic_Year_ Experience. Accessed on: February 22, 2020 (in English).

S. Frederick, “Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, pp. 25-42, 2005, doi: (in English).

R. C. Gardner, “Attitude/motivation test battery: International AMTB research project”, Canada: The University of Western Ontario, 2004 (in English).

P. Wessa, “Free Statistics Software”, Office for Research Development and Education,

version 1.2.1, 2020. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: February 22, 2020 (in English).

A. J. Onwuegbuzie, W. B. Dickinson, and N. L. Leech, “A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research”, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 8, issue 3, pp. 1-21, 2009, doi: (in English).

G. R. Hovhannisyan, “Acquisition of language meanings via smart technologies”, The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, vol. 4(1), pp. 23-37, 2016. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: February 22, 2020 (in English).

J. P. R. Prieto, “The use of clickers to assess knowledge in foreign language classes and their failure to increase reading compliance”, Revista de Lingüistica y Lenguas Aplicadas, vol. 9, pp. 88-96, 2014, doi: 10.4995/rlyla.2013.1611 (in English).




How to Cite




ICT and learning tools in the higher education establishments