PROCEDURE FOR COOPERATIVE PROFESSIONALLY ORIENTED WRITTEN COMMUNICATION OF PROSPECTIVE PROGRAMMERS

Versions

PDF

Keywords

cooperative learning
ESP
lexical competence
written communication
professionally oriented
group work
programmers

How to Cite

[1]
N. Shandra, “PROCEDURE FOR COOPERATIVE PROFESSIONALLY ORIENTED WRITTEN COMMUNICATION OF PROSPECTIVE PROGRAMMERS”, ITLT, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 188–210, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v84i4.4034.

Abstract

In the age of information and communication technologies the English language plays a significant role both in oral and written communication. The successful performance of computer programming specialists largely depends on their level of lexical competence, so a university course of English for specific purposes (ESP) focused on its development, can be exceedingly useful in the professional training of prospective programmers. This study aims at investigating the effectiveness of the collaborative professional written communication in ESP classrooms to enhance future programmers’ writing skills as well as improve their English lexical competence. To validate the efficiency of the algorithm, the author conducted experimental teaching of the 5th-year students of the Faculty of Applied Mathematics and Informatics at Ivan Franko Lviv National University in 2017‒2018 academic year. The stages of the algorithm implemented in order to advance the level of English lexical competence were elaborated. Efficiency of the algorithm has been proved on the basis of the results obtained from pre- and post- experimental assessment of students from experimental and control groups. On a practical level, the participants’ writing skills were examined through an English written test prior to and after cooperative learning activities were provided. Growth rate in students from experimental group significantly exceeded the students’ results in the control group. Thus, the efficacy of the suggested algorithm used for developing lexical competence in computer programming students has been proved. In light of the findings, the researcher indicates that teachers can benefit from applying the proposed methodology for collaborative professional writing in English classes, which may in turn develop students’ writing skills and improve their English lexical competence.

PDF

References

N. Mykytenko, N. Rozhak, and I. Semeriak, “Teaching communication strategies to the computer programming students”, Advanced Education, vol 12, pp. 50-57, 2019. doi:10.20535/2410-8286.167148. (in English).

I. S. P. Nation, Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001. (in English).

H. Hua, “A study of English vocabulary learning in China – from perspective of conceptual metaphor theory”, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 427-434, 2020. doi:10.17507/jltr.1103.11. (in English).

D. Hymes, “On communicative competence”, Linguistic Anthropology: A reader, pp. 53-73, 2001. (in English).

J. C. Richards, and W. A. Renandya, Methodology in language teaching: an anthology of current practice (11th ed.). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008. (in English).

Sh. Whyte, “Revisiting communicative competence in the teaching and assessment of language for specific purposes”, Language Education & Assessment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-19, 2019. (in English).

О. B. Bigych, Exercises in teaching reading and writing techniques in English at the initial level, Lenvit, 2000. (in Ukrainian).

S. Yu. Nikolaeva, “Aims of foreign languages learning in the competence approach,” Inozemni movy, vol. 2, pp. 11–17, 2010. (in Ukrainian).

І. P. Zadorozhna, “Theoretical and methodological principles of organization of self-guided work of future teachers in mastering English communicative competence,” Doctoral thesis, KNLU, Kyiv, Ukraine, 2012. (in Ukrainian).

G. R. Chainikova, A. V. Zatonskiy, N. W. Mitiukov, and H. L. Busygina, “Development of foreign language lexical competence on the basis of a learner’s terminological thesaurus and dictionary”, European Journal of Contemporary Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 51-59, 2018. doi:10.13187/ejced.2018.1.51. (in English).

H. Yufrizal, “Teachers and students’ perceptions of communicative competence in English as a foreign language in Indonesia”, Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 12, no. 17, pp. 867-883, 2017. doi:10.5897/ERR2017.3243. (in English).

K. Caro, and N. R. Mendinueta, “Lexis, lexical competence and lexical knowledge: A review”, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 205-213, 2017. doi:10.17507/jltr.0802.01. (in English).

N. К. Skliarenko, “Methodology of forming foreign language competence in writing,” Inozemni Movy, vol. 12, pp. 13–18, 2012. (in Ukrainian).

B. Laufer, “The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: same or different?” Applied Linguistics, vol. 12, pp. 255-271, 1998. (in English).

V. H. Tereshchuk, “Formation of English lexical competence of students of non-linguistic specialties in a virtual environment,” PhD thesis, Ternopil National Pedagogical University, Ternopil, Ukraine, 2014. (in Ukrainian).

J. Harmer, How to teach English, Pearson, 2008. (in English).

J. C Mukalel, Approaches to English language teaching. Discovery Publishing House, 2007. (in English).

C. Dalton-Puffer, N. Nikula, and U. Smit, “Charting policies, premises and research on content and language integrated learning”, in Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms, C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, and U. Smit, Eds. Benjamins, 2010, pp. 1-22. (in English).

W. E. Wright, Foundations for teaching English language learners: Research, theory, policy, and practice (2nd ed.). Caslon Publishing, 2015. (in English).

P. I. Pidkasystyi, Pupils’ individual cognitive activity while studying: theoretical and experimental research. Pedagogy, 1980. (in Russian).

T. Dudley-Evans, Developments in English for specific purposes. A multi-disciplinary approach (15th ed.). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012. (in English).

T. Hutchinson, and A. Waters, English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987. (in English).

L. I. Morska, J. Skibska, V. T. Sulym, and V. V. Masztalir, “Didactic potential of the integrated approach to teaching future programmers professional communicative competence in a foreign language,” Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 1-12, 2018. doi:10.33407/itlt.v64i2.2174. (in English).

І. Z. Semeriak, “Socio-cognitive approach to forming strategies for foreign language professionally oriented communication of future programmers using the Internet,” PhD thesis, Ternopil National Pedagogical University, Ternopil, Ukraine, 2016. (in Ukrainian).

Z. М. Kornieva, “System of professionally oriented English-speaking education of students of technical specialties at higher educational institutes,” PhD thesis abstract, KNLU, Kyiv, Ukraine, 2018. (in Ukrainian).

I. L Dmitrievykh, S. S. Kuklina, R. A. Cheremisinova, and N. V. Ogorodnikova, “Written discourse as a product of a completed level of professionally-oriented foreign language speech competence of university students,” European Journal of Contemporary Education, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 674-683, 2017. doi:10.13187/ejced.2017.4.674. (in English).

V. Ie. Romashenko, “Computer discourse as a means of forming information and communication competence of bachelors of philology,” Pedagogical Education: Theory and Practice, vol. 15, pp. 166-170, 2013. (in English).

L. І. Morska, “Methodical aspects of constructing a computerized lesson in foreign languages,” Bulletin of Zhytomyr State University. Pedagogical Sciences, vol. 64, pp. 65–68, 2012. (in Ukrainian).

O. V. Tynkaliuk, and I. Z. Semeriak, “Virtual teaching and learning environment in shaping strategies for professional foreign language communication between future software engineers,” Information Technologies and Learning Tools. Theory, Methods and Practice of Using ICT in Education, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 239-249, 2018. doi:10.33407/itlt.v67i5.2272. (in English).

I. Ipek, and R. Ziatdinov, “New approaches and trends in the philosophy of educational technology for learning and teaching environments,” European Journal of Contemporary Education, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 381-389, 2017. doi:10.13187/ejced.2017.3.381. (in English).

E. E. Kabanova, and E. A. Vetrova, “The use of modern electronic gadgets in the educational process of the university,” European Journal of Contemporary Education, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 524-533, 2019. doi:10.13187/ejced.2019.3.524. (in English).

N. G. Valeeva, E. B. Pavlova, and Y. L. Zakirova, “M-learning in teaching ESP: Case study of ecology students,” European Journal of Contemporary Education, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 920-930, 2019. doi:10.13187/ejced.2019.4.920. (in English).

І. А. Rapoport, and H. А. Turiy, Individual work in the foreign language of high school students. Kyiv, Radianska Shkola, 1979. (in Ukrainian).

O. L. Shums’kyi, “Use of IT for future foreign language teachers’ linguistic self-education,” Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 269-278, 2020. doi:10.33407/itlt.v75i1.2778. (in English).

І. P. Zadorozhna, Organization of self-guided work of future English language teachers on practical language training. Ternopil, TNPU, 2011. (in Ukrainian).

P. B. Gurvich, Theory and practice of experiment in the theory of teaching foreign languges. Vladimir State Pedagogical University, 1980. (in Russian).

I. V. Ilyina, N. A. Tarasuk, O. M. Novikova, and N. S. Gribova, “Communicative competence formation of teachers in the sphere of foreign language education in the system of the advanced training”, European Journal of Contemporary Education, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 699-709, 2018. doi:10.13187/ejced.2018.4.699. (in English).

R. A. M. Al-Shamiry, “Communicative competence of the Saudi learners of English at the faculty of languages and translation, King Khalid University”, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 446-461, 2020. doi:10.17507/jltr.1103.13. (in English).

R. Anggraini, Y. Rozimela, and D. Anwar, “The effects of collaborative writing on EFL learners’ writing skills and their perception of the strategy”, Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 335-341, 2020. doi:10.17507/jltr.1102.25. (in English).

N. V. Mayer, Formation of methodological competence in future French language teachers. Kyiv, KNLU, 2015. (in Ukrainian).

О. B. Tarnapolskyi, and А. D. Vyselko, Concept of foreign language immersion and opportunities of its implementation while teaching English for Specific Purposes. [Online]. Available: https://www.sworld.com.ua/simpoz3/52.pdf. Accessed on: May 15, 2018. (in Russian).

О. B. Tarnapolskyi, V. Е. Momota, and S. P. Kozhushko, Methodology of English language immersion into learning English and special subjects at economic universities. DUEP, 2008. (in Russian).

О. Bykonia, Organization of individual extracurricular work in English of students of economic specialties. CHNTU, 2015. (in Ukrainian).

R. S. Gurevych, O. V. Klochko, V. I. Klochko, M. M. Kovtoniuk, and N. R. Opushko, “Computer science teachers’ readiness to develop and use computer didactic games in educational process”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 122-137, 2020. doi:10.33407/itlt.v75i1.3394. (in English).

Т. І. Koval, “Problems of implementing e-learning while professional training of future managers-economists,” Theoretical Issues of Culture, Education and Upbringing, vol. 42, pp. 86–91, 2010. (in Ukrainian).

V. Yu. Bykov, Formation of information and communication competences in the context of European integration processes of creation of information and educational space. Atika, 2014. (in Ukrainian).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Nataliya Shandra

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.