ELECTRONIC RESOURCES TYPOLOGY IN THE FORMATION OF SPECIALIST’S RHETORIC CULTURE

Keywords: rhetorical culture, electronic resources, electronic educational resources, specialized software in the field of rhetoric, formation of rhetorical culture, information technologies, professional training

Abstract

The interpretation of the category "rhetorical culture" as an integrative personality characteristic, which includes knowledge of history, theory and methods of public speaking (stages of speech preparation, rhetorical paths and figures, methods of activating audience attention, etc.), intellectual, speech, ethical, esthetic and artistic-performing qualities, which are expressed in the form of an original product of mental-speech activity, is given in the article. The typology of electronic resources in the teacher’s rhetorical culture formation is characterized. They include video content (speeches of outstanding speakers of the past and present, movies fragments, theater performances, television programs, speeches of masters of the artistic word, lectures by national and foreign teachers, reports of famous scientists, fragments of lessons and educational activities), audio content (podcasts, audiobooks), rhetoric courses on educational platforms (UDEMY, EDUGET, TED), specialized resources on rhetoric, specialized software in the field of rhetoric (Speaker Coach, Ummo, Public Speaking, Black Rhetoric, Govorillo), social communities for on-line communication (Facebook, Instagram, Telegram). Descriptive characteristics of each type are briefly provided and relevant examples with Internet links to typical Internet content are given. According to the analysis of electronic resources in the field of rhetoric for the specialist’s rhetorical culture formation, the most effective, according to experts (experts in the field of public speaking), are the use of video content, namely speeches of prominent speakers of the past and present, use of audio content software, which is confirmed by the Kendall concordance coefficient (0.87) and the χ^2-criterion for estimating the probability of the result χ = 26.85, which at the significance level of 0.05 confirms the probability of the expert group's conclusions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dmytro V. Budianskyi, Makarenko Sumy State Pedagogical University

PhD of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at Department of Fine Arts, Musicology and Culturology

Marina G. Drushlyak, Makarenko Sumy State Pedagogical University

PhD of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at Department of Mathematics

Olena V. Semenikhina, Makarenko Sumy State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Chair of Department of Computer Science

Inna I. Kharchenko, Sumy National Agrarian University

PhD of Phylological Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Department of State and Legal Disciplines and Ukrainian Studies

Vasyl O. Horbachuk, National Pedagogic University after M. P. Dragomanov

Senior Lecturer at Department of Methodology and Methodics of Teaching Physical and Mathematical Disciplines in the Higher School

Olga S. Chashechnikova, Makarenko Sumy State Pedagogical University

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Chair of Department of Mathematics

References

С. Д. Абрамович, та М. Ю. Чікарькова, “Риторика: навч. посібник”. Львів: Світ, 2001.

Н. Б. Голуб, “Риторична освіта сучасного вчителя”. Зб. наук. праць Бердянського держ. пед. ун-ту. №4, c. 197-203, 2009.

Я. В. Білоусова, “Формування риторичної культури студентів гуманітарних факультетів у навчально-виховному процесі”, дис. канд. пед. наук, Київський національний ун-т ім. Тараса Шевченка, Київ, 2004.

О. Б. Залюбівська, “Педагогічні умови формування риторичної культури майбутніх викладачів технічних університетів та їх реалізація”. Вісник Вінницького політехнічного інституту. № 6, c. 101-106, 2016.

В. В. Тарасова, “Риторична культура як складова професійно-комунікативної компетенції майбутніх корекційних педагогів”. Педагогіка формування творчої особистості у вищій і загальноосвітній школах. Вип. 34, c. 341-347, 2014.

J. Schneider, Rhetoric and practice in pre-service teacher education: the case of teach for America. Journal of education policy, V. 29, Is. 4, pp. 425-442, 2014. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.825329.

L. Luneva, To the problem of formation of rhetorical culture of a high school teacher. Chuzhdoezikovo obuchenie-foreign language teachingб V. 47, Is. 4, pp. 409-416, 2020.

M. Clark, “Kenneth Burke, rhetoric, subjectivity, postmodernism”, Southern humanities review, V.34, Is. 1, pp. 78-80, 2000.

О. Е. Коневщинська, “Розвиток медіаосвіти і медіакультури в умовах сучасного інформаційного суспільства”, Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, Т. 54, № 4, c. 32-41, 2016.

В. В. Олійник, І. М. Андрощук, І. І. Остапйовська, П. С. Олешко, та Д. А. Пріма, “Формування інформаційної культури майбутніх учителів початкової школи засобами інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій”, Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, Т. 75, №1, c. 212-224, 2020.

Т. И. Осина, “Методика использования видеозаписи на уроках риторики”, дис. канд пед. наук, Московский педагогический гос. университет, Москва, 2005.

Міністерство освіти і науки, молоді та спорту України. Наказ № 749 від 29 травня 2019 року. Положення про електронні освітні ресурси. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/view/Re33637?an=1.

H. Loizos, L. Klaering, Charismatic Leadership and Rhetorical Competence An Analysis of Steve Jobs's Rhetoric. Group & Organization Management, V.39, Is.2, pp. 131-161, 2014.

О. А. Щербакова, “Підвищення ефективності викладання риторикознавчих дисциплін у вищій школі України на засадах компетентнісного підходу”, y Оптимізація циклу соціально-гуманітарних дисциплін у вищій освіті України в контексті євроінтеграції, Г. В. Онкович, Ред., Київ: НАПН України, 2014, с. 221-257.

О. В. Застело, “Аналіз методів визначення узгодженості думки групи експертів під час оцінювання рівня сформованості іншомовної комунікативної компетентності слухачів”, Комп’ютер у школі та сім’ї, №8, с.18-22, 2015.


REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

S. D. Abramovych, and M. Yu. Chikarkova, “Rhetoric: textbook”. Lviv: Svit, 2001.(in Ukrainian)

N. B. Holub, “Rhetorical education of a modern teacher”, Zb. nauk. prats Berdianskoho derzh. ped. un-tu, no. 4, pp. 197-203, 2009. (in Ukrainian)

Ia. V. Bilousova, “Formation of humanities faculties students’ rhetorical culture in the educational process”, Ph.D. dissertation, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, 2004. (in Ukrainian)

O. B. Zaliubivska, “Pedagogical conditions of formation of rhetorical culture of future teachers of technical universities and their realization”, Visnyk Vinnytskoho politekhnichnoho instytutu, no. 6, pp. 101-106, 2016.(in Ukrainian)

V. V. Tarasova, “Rhetorical culture as a component of professional and communicative competence of future correctional teachers”, Pedahohika formuvannia tvorchoi osobystosti u vyshchii i zahalnoosvitnii shkolakh, vol. 34, pp. 341-347, 2014.(in Ukrainian)

J. Schneider, Rhetoric and practice in pre-service teacher education: the case of teach for America. Journal of education policy, V. 29, Is. 4, pp. 425-442, 2014. doi: 10.1080/02680939.2013.825329. (in English)

L. Luneva, To the problem of formation of rhetorical culture of a high school teacher. Chuzhdoezikovo obuchenie-foreign language teaching, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 409-416, 2020.(in English)

M. Clark, “Kenneth Burke, rhetoric, subjectivity, postmodernism”, Southern humanities review, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 78-80, 2000.(in English)

O. E. Konevshchynska, “Development of media education and media culture under the conditions of modern information society”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 32-41, 2016.(in Ukrainian)

V. V. Oliinyk, I. M. Androshchuk, I. I. Ostapiovska, P. S. Oleshko, and D. A. Prima, “Information culture development of future primary school teachers by means of information and communication technologies”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 212-224, 2020.(in Ukrainian)

T. I. Osina, “Methodology for using video recording in rhetoric lessons”, Ph.D. dissertation, Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, 2005.(in Russian)

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (2019, May. 29). Order No. 749, Regulations on electronic educational resources. [Online] Available: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/view/Re33637?an=1.(in Ukrainian)

H. Loizos, and L. Klaering, “Charismatic Leadership and Rhetorical Competence: An Analysis of Steve Jobs's Rhetoric”, Group & Organization Management, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 131-161, 2014.(in English)

O. A. Shcherbakova, “Improving the effectiveness of teaching rhetorical disciplines in higher education in Ukraine on the basis of a competency-based approach”, in Optimization of the cycle of social sciences and humanities in higher education in Ukraine in the context of European integration, H. V. Onkovych, Ed., Kyiv: NAPN Ukrainy, 2014, pp. 221-257.(in Ukrainian)

O. V. Zastelo, “Analysis of methods for determining the consistency of opinion of a group of experts when assessing the level of formation of foreign language communicative competence of students”, Kompiuter u shkoli ta simi, no. 8, pp.18-22, 2015.(in Ukrainian)

Published
2021-02-23
How to Cite
Budianskyi, D. V., Drushlyak, M. G., Semenikhina, O. V., Kharchenko, I. I., Horbachuk, V. O., & Chashechnikova, O. S. (2021). ELECTRONIC RESOURCES TYPOLOGY IN THE FORMATION OF SPECIALIST’S RHETORIC CULTURE. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 81(1), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v81i1.4292
Section
ICT and learning tools in vocational education and training

Most read articles by the same author(s)