DEVELOPMENT OF E-PLATFORM FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL ONLINE TESTING OF GIFTED SENIOR PUPILS AND STUDENTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4700

Keywords:

computer psychodiagnostics, gifted students, online psychological testing

Abstract

The article analyzes the features of modern psychological online testing. It is established that the development of computer psychodiagnostics is facilitated by the obtained data on the equivalence of psychometric indicators of paper and computer tests. The need for ICT to support psychological research and the development of an electronic platform for online testing of gifted senior pupils and students is substantiated. The e-platform was developed in accordance with the recommendations of the International Test Commission on technology, quality, control and security of computer and Internet testing. E-platform "Giftedness TEST ONLINE" consists of four blocks: 1) research management; 2) testing and feedback; 3) processing and storage of information; 4) methodological support and development of new methods. The requirements for computer psychodiagnostic methods used on the electronic platform, as well as for computer psychodiagnostic techniques are described. First of all, it is the focus on the values of gifted people in the areas of social interaction, development of abilities and maintaining self-identity. The tasks of the tests should correspond to the increased level of intelligence, take into account the critical thinking, promote the development of reflection and direct gifted senior pupils and students to self-development of abilities. It is important to implement the following feedback requirements: a) subjects should receive reports on test results and their individual interpretation; b) interpretations of the results for the subjects should not go beyond the theoretical foundations of the test, be accessible, free from evaluative judgments, promote reflection and self-regulation, encourage self-development; c) respondents should be able to ask questions or make suggestions to the organizers of testing. A comparative analysis of the results of the research was made with the help of the developed beta version of the electronic platform (online) and with the help of paper tests (offline). Empirical research has shown that students prefer online testing on such parameters as presentation of stimulus material, availability of test results, and alignment with values and lifestyles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr L. Muzyka, G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the NAES of Ukraine

PhD of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Giftedness Psychology

Olena O. Muzyka, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

PhD of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of Pedagogy and Psychology

Yuriy О. Osnadchuk

Software Engineer

References

Національна доповідь про стан і перспективи розвитку освіти в Україні: монографія / Нац. акад. пед. наук України; за заг. ред. В. Г. Кременя. Київ, Україна: КОНВІ ПРІНТ, 2021. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/726223/

V. Bykov, D. Mikulowski, O. Moravcik, S. Svetsky and M. Shyshkina, “The use of the cloud-based open learning and research platform for collaboration in virtual teams”. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 304-320, 2020, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v76i2.3706.

The International Test Commission, “International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing”. International Journal of Testing, 6(2), pp. 143-171, 2006, doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_4.

Y. Piaw Chua, “Effects of computer-based testing on test performance and testing motivation”. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1580-1586, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.020.

Р. Elosua, “Avances, proyectos y retos internacionales ligados al uso de tests en Psicología”. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), vol. 34, no. 2, рр. 201-210, 2017, doi: 10.1590/1982-02752017000200002.

S. Bailey, A. Neigel, L. Dhanani and V. Sims, “Establishing Measurement Equivalence Across Computer- and Paper-Based Tests of Spatial Cognition”. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 340-350, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0018720817747731.

M. Ebrahimi, S. Hashemi Toroujeni and V. Shahbazi, “Score Equivalence, Gender Difference, and Testing Mode Preference in a Comparative Study between Computer-Based Testing and Paper-Based Testing”. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 14, no. 07, p. 128-143, 2019, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i07.10175.

A. Evers et al., “Testing Practices and Attitudes Toward Tests and Testing: An International Survey”. International Journal of Testing, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 158-190, 2017, doi: 10.1080/15305058.2016.1216434.

P. Macqueen, W. Howe, and M. Power, “Online psychological testing”. VIC, Australia: APS Tests and Testing Expert Group, 2018. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://psychology.org.au/aps/media/resource-finder/testing/online-psychological-testing.pdf

S. Maksymenko, and O. Kokun, “Principles of website design for professional psychological diagnosis in different specialties”. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 284-292, 2019, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v73i5.2963.

О. Л. Музика, О. О. Музика, С. Ставицька, та Г. Ставицький, “Психосемантичнi основи професiйної самоефективностi студентiв: стан сучасного наукового дискурсу”. Мiждисциплiнарнi дослiдження складних систем, № 18, с. 99-112, 2021, doi: 10.31392/iscs.2021.18.099.

В. Биков, О. Спірін, та О. Пінчук, “Проблеми та завдання сучасного етапу інформатизації освіти”. Наукове забезпечення розвитку освіти в Україні: актуальні проблеми теорії і практики (до 25-річчя НАПН України). Київ, Україна: Видавничий дім «Сам», с. 191-198, 2017. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/709026/.

Аксіогенез обдарованої особистості в освітньому просторі: монографія / за ред. О. Л. Музики. Київ, Україна: Видавничий Дім «Слово», 2020. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/723153/1/%D0%9C%D0%9E%D0%9D%D0%9E%D0%93%D0%A0%D0%90%D0%A4%D0%86%D0%AF%202020.pdf


REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

National Report on the State and Prospects of Education Development in Ukraine: monograph . Nats. akad. ped. nauk Ukrainy; za zah. red. V. H. Kremenia. Kyiv, Ukraina: KONVI PRINT, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/726223/. (in Ukrainian)

V. Bykov, D. Mikulowski, O. Moravcik, S. Svetsky and M. Shyshkina, “The use of the cloud-based open learning and research platform for collaboration in virtual teams”. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 304-320, 2020, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v76i2.3706. (in English)

The International Test Commission, “International Guidelines on Computer-Based and Internet-Delivered Testing”. International Journal of Testing, no. 6 (2), pp.143-171, 2006, doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_4. (in English)

Y. Piaw Chua, “Effects of computer-based testing on test performance and testing motivation”. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1580-1586, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.020. (in English)

Р. Elosua, “Advances, projects and international challenges linked to the use of tests in Psychology”. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), vol. 34, no. 2, рр. 201-210, 2017, doi: 10.1590/1982-02752017000200002. (in Spanish)

S. Bailey, A. Neigel, L. Dhanani and V. Sims, “Establishing Measurement Equivalence Across Computer- and Paper-Based Tests of Spatial Cognition”. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 340-350, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0018720817747731. (in English)

M. Ebrahimi, S. Hashemi Toroujeni and V. Shahbazi, “Score Equivalence, Gender Difference, and Testing Mode Preference in a Comparative Study between Computer-Based Testing and Paper-Based Testing”. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 14, no. 07, p. 128-143, 2019, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v14i07.10175. (in English)

A. Evers et al., “Testing Practices and Attitudes Toward Tests and Testing: An International Survey”. International Journal of Testing, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 158-190, 2017, doi: 10.1080/15305058.2016.1216434. (in English)

P. Macqueen, W. Howe, and M. Power, “Online psychological testing”. VIC, Australia: APS Tests and Testing Expert Group, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://psychology.org.au/aps/media/resource-finder/testing/online-psychological-testing.pdf. (in English)

S. Maksymenko, and O. Kokun, “Principles of website design for professional psychological diagnosis in different specialties”. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 284-292, 2019, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v73i5.2963. (in English)

O. L. Muzyka, O. O. Muzyka, S. Stavytska, and H. Stavytskyi, “Psychosemantic fundamentals of professional self-efficacy of students: the state of modern scientific discourse”. Interdisciplinary Studies of Complex Systems, no. 18, рр. 99-112, 2021, doi: 10.31392/iscs.2021.18.099. (in Ukrainian)

Yu. Bykov, O. M. Spirin, and O. P. Pinchuk, “Problems and tasks of the modern stage of informatization of education”, in Scientific support for the development of education in Ukraine: actual problems of theory and practice (up to the 25th anniversary of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine). Kyiv, Ukraina: Vydavnychyi dim “Sam”, pp. 191-198, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/709026/. (in Ukrainian)

Axiogenesis of a gifted person in the educational space: monograph / Inst. psykhol. im. H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy; za red. O. L. Muzyky. Kyiv, Ukraina: Vydavnychyi Dim «Slovo», 2020. [Online]. Available: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/723153/1/%D0%9C%D0%9E%D0%9D%D0%9E%D0%93%D0%A0%D0%90%D0%A4%D0%86%D0%AF%202020.pdf. (in Ukrainian)

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Muzyka О. Л., Muzyka О. О., & Osnadchuk Ю. О. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF E-PLATFORM FOR PSYCHOLOGICAL ONLINE TESTING OF GIFTED SENIOR PUPILS AND STUDENTS. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 89(3), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4700

Issue

Section

ICT to support psychological and educational research