selection criteria
cloud-based LMS
learning management system
higher education institution

How to Cite

O. M. Spirin, T. A. Vakaliuk, V. V. Ievdokymov, and S. I. Sydorenko, “CRITERIA FOR SELECTING A CLOUD-BASED LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR A HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION”, ITLT, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 105–120, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4958.


The paper explores the essence of the criteria and indicators which can be used to select a cloud-oriented learning support system for a higher education institution. The following criteria with corresponding indicators are identified: design criterion (reliability, accessibility, multilinguality, security, adaptability, ease of use and administration, free use); technological criterion (user access rights differentiation, cloud storage of data, integration with other cloud-based services, ability to download different types of files); communication criterion (user registration, communication between registered users, creating groups, creating forums and chats); information-didactic criterion (structuredness, calendar, assessment of student achievement, file sharing, testing and surveys, group and individual modes of work; analytics for a particular course). The most downloaded LMS are shown based on the results published by LMS Market Share. The paper offers an analysis of a number of cloud-based learning management systems (Google Classroom, Moodle, Edmodo, Studyboard, Oracle, Learner Nation, iSpring, Canvas, Schoology, Blackboard, NeoLms) in terms of the above-mentioned criteria and indicators. The systems were selected based on the method of expert evaluation. The expert evaluation showed that the most convenient and high-quality cloud-based learning management system for building a cloud-oriented learning environment of a higher education institution which best meets all the criteria are NeoLMS, Canvas and Google Classroom. These LMS offer all the functionalities which are essential in the educational process. We see the development of methodological recommendations for higher education regarding the high-quality and successful implementation of such learning management systems in the educational process as prospects for further research.



O. M. Spirin. "Information and digital technologies of the virtual university of postgraduate education", in IV All-Ukrainian electronic scientific and practical conference "Open education and distance learning: from theory to practice", November 20, 2019 Kyiv, Ukraine. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in Ukrainian)

S.H.P.W. Gamage, J. R. Ayres, & M. B. Behrend. «A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning», International Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 9, Article number 9, 2022. doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x. (in English)

Alia, Abdallah Ahmed Hassan. “The Analysis of a Learning Management System from a Design and Development Perspective”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology. vol. 12, no. 4, 2022. pp. 280 – 289. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.4.1616. (in English)

I. Kadek Suartama, Luh Putu Putrini Mahadewi, Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana, and Muhammad Yunus. "ICARE Approach for Designing Online Learning Module Based on LMS," International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 12, no 4, pp. 305-312, 2022. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.4.1619. (in English)

Sophia Mitra. “Role of LMS Assessment Tools”, Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. vol. 22, no. 2, 2022. pp. 19 – 35. doi: 10.33423/jhetp.v22i2.5034. (in English)

Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh. “Revisiting the Effectiveness of Blackboard Learning Management System in Teaching English in the Era of COVID-19”, World Journal of English Language, vol. 12(1):1. 2021. doi: 10.5430/wjel.v12n1p1. (in English)

M., Şahin, H. Yurdugül. “Learners’ Needs in Online Learning Environments and Third Generation Learning Management Systems (LMS 3.0)”, Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 27, pp.33–48, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10758-020-09479-x. (in English)

J.R. Simon, J.G. Randall. “Predictors and consequences of typical and “addictive” LMS use”. Education and Information Technologies, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11028-1. (in English)

O. D. Triswidrananta, A. N. Pramudhita, & I.D.Wijaya. “Learning Management System Based on Assessment for Learning to Improve Computational Thinking”. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 16 (04), 2022. pp. 150–158. doi: 10.3991/ijim.v16i04.28979. (in English)

T. A.Vakaliuk, O. M. Spirin, N. M. Lobanchykova, L. A. Martseva, I. V. Novitska, and V. V. Kontsedailo. “Features of distance learning of cloud technologies for the organization educational process in quarantine”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1840, 012051, in XII International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (ICon-MaSTEd 2020) 15-17 October 2020, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012051. (in English)

O.S.Holovnia. "Criteria for selection of virtualization software in teaching UNIX-like operating systems". Information technologies in education. vol. 24. 2015. pp. 119-133. (in Ukrainian)

O. A. Halchevska. Criteria and indicators for the selection of scientometric systems in scientific and pedagogical research. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in Ukrainian)

O. A. Halchevska. “Use of international open access scientometric databases in scientific research”. Information technologies in education. vol. 23. 2015. pp.115-126. (in Ukrainian)

K.R.Kovalska. "Selection of computer software for distance learning for the organization of postgraduate education of teachers of informatics", Information Technologies and Learning Tools. vol. 5 (13). 2009. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in Ukrainian)

K. R. Kolos. "Process Model and Selection Criteria for Components of a Computer-Based Learning Environment of an Institution of Postgraduate Pedagogical Education". Information technologies in education. vol. 17. 2013. pp. 109-117. (in Ukrainian)

L. A. Luparenko. "The use of open access electronic journal systems for the production of scientific and educational publications: a comparative analysis of software", Information Technologies and Learning Tools. vol. 5 (25). 2011. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in Ukrainian)

O. M. Spirin, O. R. Oleksiuk. "Analysis of software platforms for creating institutional repositories", Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 34, no. 2. 2013, pp. 101-115. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in Ukrainian)

N. Kopniuak at al. Modeling and integration of cloud-based learning environment services: monograph. K., TsP "Komprint", 2015. (in Ukrainian)

49 LMS Statistics and Trends for a Post-COVID World. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in English)

Moodle. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in English)

Edmodo. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in English)

Learnernation. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in English)

iSpring. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in English)

Schoology. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in English)

Blackboard. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in English)

Neo lms. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in English)

I. M. Dychkavska. Innovative pedagogical technologies: textbook. K., Akademvydav, 2004. (in Ukrainian)

V. V. Kovalchuk, L. M. Moiseiev. Fundamentals of scientific research: textbook. К., Profesional, 2005. (in Ukrainian)

Philosophical Dictionary. [Online]. Available: Accessed on: Apr 19, 2022. (in Russian)

S. D. Beshelev, F. H. Hyrvich. Mathematical and statistical methods of expert assessments. M., Statistica, 1980. (in Russian)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Олег Михайлович Спірін, Тетяна Анатоліївна Вакалюк, Віктор Валерійович Євдокимов, Сергій Іванович Сидоренко


Download data is not yet available.