cloud services, Cisco Webex, distance learning, group work, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365


The transformation of classical education into distance education has become increasingly relevant, especially given the challenging conditions posed by the COVID-19 pandemic and military operations in our country. In these circumstances, distance learning requires practical educational materials that are easily accessible to students. This paper proposes criteria and indicators for selecting digital tools that can facilitate group work with educational content in distance learning. We analyzed the tools available on the Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and Cisco Webex platforms and evaluated their suitability for managing students’ group work in distance learning in institutions of higher education at various stages of the learning process including setting tasks, designing the learning environment, facilitating group interaction and communication, managing educational content and files, promoting teamwork and productivity, and presenting results. To obtain expert assessment of the defined criteria and indicators, we engaged seventeen researchers and educators who have practical experience using digital tools in distance learning. Our study identified three important criteria for selecting digital tools for group work with educational content, namely: design, functional-technological, education-communication ones. We determined the weight of the indicators for these criteria and assessed digital tools for group work with educational content in distance learning. Digital tools such as Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace was found to be more suitable for providing group work of students in a distance learning, while Cisco Webex was found to be the most suitable tool for organizing real-time group work. Other digital tools for group work of students in distance learning can be evaluated according to defined criteria and indicators.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Olena G. Glazunova, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Ed. D, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Information Technology

Andrii M. Hurzhii, Institute for Digitalisation of Education of the NAES of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Academician of NAES of Ukraine, Chief Researcher of the Electronic Learning Resources Department of Digital Transformation of the NAES of Ukraine

Valentyna I. Korolchuk, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor of the Chair of Information Systems and Technologies

Tetiana V. Voloshyna, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

PhD. E., Associate Professor of the Chair of Information Systems and Technologies


A. Skrypnyk, N. Klimenko, I. Kostenko, “The formation of digital competence for the population as a way to economic growth”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 2020, 78(4), 278–297. doi: (in Ukrainian).

O. Glazunova, T. Saiapina, V. Korolchuk, O. Kasatkina, T. Voloshyna, “Digital intelligence of a modern economist: an exploratory case study”, SHS Web of Conferences International Conference on History, Theory and Methodology of Learning, 04 May 2021, 104. (in English).

I. Zutiasari, “Development of Digital Sway Teaching Materials for Online Learning in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era”, International Research Conference on Economics and Business, June 2021, 200-209. doi: (in English).

L. Soon, M. Sarrafzadeh, “Preparing Students for Online Group Work in Distance Education”. The Second International Conference on E-Learning and E-Teaching (ICELET), 2010, 40-48. (in English).

V. Naik, A. Govindu, “Enriching and Energizing the Virtual Classroom using Breakout Sessions: A better experience of Active Learning during Covid- 19 Pandemic”, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 2022, 35(1), 129-134. doi: 10.16920/jeet/2022/v35is1/22018. (in English).

S. Dash, S. Samadder, A. Srivastava, R. Meena, P. Ranjan, “Review of Online Teaching Platforms in the Current Period of COVID-19 Pandemic”. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2022, 84, 12-17. doi: (in English).

L. Al-Qora’n, OAl. Sheik Salem, N. Gordon. “Heuristic Evaluation of Microsoft Teams as an Online Teaching Platform: An Educators’ Perspective.” Computers, 2022, 11(12), 175-187. (in English).

Q. Li, Z. Li, J. Han, “A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education”. Education and Information Technologies, 2021, 26, 7635-7655. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10612-1. (in English).

S. Pokhre, R. Chhetri, “A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning”. Higher Education for the Future, 2021 8(1). doi: (in English).

I. Ketut Sudarsana et al., “The use of Google classroom in the learning process”. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1175 (2019) 012165. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012165. (in English).

R. Sofya, R. Sahara, “Optimization of Flipped Classroom Using Google Classroom to Improve Student Learning Outcome”. Proceedings Of The 5th Padang International Conference On Economics Education, Economics, Business And Management, Accounting And Entrepreneurship (Piceeba-5 2020). Book Series: AEBMR-Advances in Economics Business and Management Research, 2020, 152, 407-412. (in English).

I. Podik, “The implementation of Google services for teaching generation Z students”. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 2017, 60(4), 264-274. doi: (in Ukrainian).

R. Gurevych, I. Shakhina, O. Podzygun, “Google Classroom as an effective tool of smart learning and monitoring of students’ knowledge in vocational schools”. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 2020, 79(5), 59-72. doi: (in English).

M. Shak, M. Tahir, A. Adnan, N. Piaralal, Dianna. Shah, “Google Classroom as Perceived by Educators: An Overview”. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 2021 6(7), 360-369/ doi: (in English).

I. Fitriyah, Y. Mulyati, I. Fardhani, “Optimization of Microsoft Office 365 for blended learning-based learning in natural science subjects”. Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 2021, 5(2), 88-92. doi: (in English).

A. Skendzic, B. Kovacic “Microsoft Office 365 – cloud in business environment”, Proceedings of the 35thInternational Convention. MIPRO, 2012, (in English)

O. Glazunova, T. Voloshyna, V. Korolchuk, “Hybrid cloud-oriented learning environment for IT student project teamwork”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 2020, 77(3), 114-129. [Online]. Available: doi: (in English).

S. Bamforth, G. Perkin, J. Flint, “Understanding the student perspective of Microsoft OneNote as a learning resource in higher education”, ICERI2019 Proceedings, 2019, 9838-9847. (in English).

T. Vakaliuk, “The main characteristics of a cloud-oriented educational environment for the training of bachelors of informatics”. Scientific journal of the NPU named after M. P. Drahomanov. Series 2. Computer-oriented learning systems, 2017, 19(26), 154-157. (in Ukrainian).

T. Vakaliuk, “Theoretical and methodological principles of designing and using a cloud-oriented educational environment in the preparation of bachelors of computer science”, Doctor dissertation, Institute of Information Technologies and Teaching Aids of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, 2019. (in Ukrainian).

D. Bonett, T. Wright, “Sample size requirements for pearson, kendall, and spearman correlations”. Springer International Publishing AG: Psychometrika, 2000, 65(1), 23-28. (in English).




How to Cite

O. G. Glazunova, A. M. Hurzhii, V. I. Korolchuk, and T. V. Voloshyna, “SELECTION OF DIGITAL TOOLS FOR ORGANIZING STUDENTS’ GROUP WORK IN DISTANCE EDUCATION”, ITLT, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 87–101, Apr. 2023.



ICT and learning tools in the higher education establishments

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>