RESPONSIBLE AND ETHICAL USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN RESEARCH AND PUBLISHING
PDF (Ukrainian)

Keywords

generative AI
higher education
ChatGPT
academic integrity
scientific publication
scientific journal editorial board

How to Cite

[1]
O. Pinchuk and I. Malytska, “RESPONSIBLE AND ETHICAL USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN RESEARCH AND PUBLISHING”, ITLT, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 180–198, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v100i2.5676.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is gradually gaining a stable place in our lives, and its use is spreading too quickly in all areas of activity, changing approaches and simplifying the solution of some tasks. AI can help at certain stages of scientific research, but it also poses risks of plagiarism, lack of academic integrity and high ethical standards. The problem of plagiarism and its prevention in the research and publication process has reached a high degree of relevance, especially with the use of AI programs and services. The article presents a comprehensive analysis of scientific sources covering the prevention of plagiarism in scientific publications, the development of AI in research culture, the observance of academic integrity in the university environment, and changes in the assessment of students' academic achievements..Using the GoogleTrends service, based on the search engine's statistical data, it was determined that recently, scientific topics related to ChatGPT have been dominating in the queries of Internet users, while the discourse related to plagiarism, academic integrity, research ethics, and responsible use of AI is not noticeably relevant, and there is an increase in related queries between "plagiarism" and AI tools. The authors substantiate the impact of the use of AI on the responsible attitude to the presentation  of research results. After processing the downloaded data in Excel, a hypothesis is formulated regarding the convergence of interests and joint consideration of the problems of ethics in research and responsible use of AI. The analysed data demonstrate that the relevance of ethical and responsible use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scientific manuscripts is extremely high. The article demonstrates how digital tools such as Connected Papers, Inciteful, LitMaps, Scite.Ai, ResearchRabbit, and Semantic Scholar can conveniently visualise documents related to search terms. The article offers recommendations for researchers and editorial board members of scientific journals to promote responsible presentation of research findings in the context of the growing availability and use of AI.

PDF (Ukrainian)

References

Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment, [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://coara.eu. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

J. Osborne, D. Pimentel, B. Alberts, D. Allchin, S. Barzilai, C. Bergstrom, J. Coffey, B. Donovan, K. Kivinen, A. Kozyreva, & S. Wineburg (2022). Science Education in an Age of Misinformation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2434623/science_education_in_an_age_of_misinformation/3456215/ Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

О. Пінчук & І. Малицька (2020). Ефективна експертиза публікацій як запорука якості наукових видань. Теорія і практика управління соціальними системами, 4, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7782.2020.4.06.

Л. A. Лупаренко (2014). Інструментарій виявлення плагіату в наукових роботах: аналіз програмних рішень. Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, 40(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v40i2.1050.

О. Г. Кузьмінська, Л. А. Лупаренко, О. П. Пінчук, Майстер-клас «Етичні засади публікації результатів наукових досліджень: запобігання плагіату». Зб. матер. наук.-пр. конф. з міжнар. уч. «Відкрита наука в умовах інтеграції освіти України до європейського дослідницького простору», OS-UA-ERA-2023, (27 квіт. 2023 р.), С. 95-103. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/736228. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

L. Korn & N. Davidovitch (2016). The Profile of Academic Offenders: Features of Students Who Admit to Academic Dishonesty. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 22, 3043–3055. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.898810.

S. A. Wowra (2007). Moral identities, social anxiety, and academic dishonesty among American college students. Ethics & Behavior, 17, 303-321.

S. Béland, J. S. Bureau & M. Peters (2020). Plagier en temps de pandémie. Évaluer. Journal international de recherche en éducation et formation, Numéro Hors-série, 1, 35-40. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341078872_Plagier_en_temps_de_pandemie Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Julia Chen. Four directions for assessment redesign in the age of generative AI. THE - Times Higher Education. 21 Jul 2023. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/four-directions-assessment-redesign-age-generative-ai Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

B. Moorhouse, M. Yeo & Y. Wan (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open. 5(2023).100151 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151.

Q. Vidal, S. Vincent-Lancrin and H. Yun (2023), "Emerging governance of generative AI in education", in OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem, OECD Publishing, Paris, [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://doi.org/10.1787/2a73a245-en.

Інститут цифровізації освіти НАПН України. (2023 р., 27 квітня). Майстер-клас «Етичні засади публікації результатів наукових досліджень: запобігання плагіату» [Відео]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYjMBDnJIXY&t=1s. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

T. M. Culley (2014). APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no. Applications in Plant Sciences, 2: 1400055. https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400055.

I. Jarić (2016). High time for a common plagiarism detection system. Scientometrics. 106, 457–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1756-6.

S. Kannan & S. Gowri (2014). Anti-plagiarism software in biomedical literature. Journal of Scientometric Research, 3(2), 93–94

A. Marusic, V. Katavic & M. Marusic (2007). Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Medicine and Law, 26, 545–566.

T. Mala & T. V. Geetha (2007). Visualization of Plagiarism Detected in Documents. International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA 2007), 92-96, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIMA.2007.109.

A Culture of Ethical AI: Report JULY 2022. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://cifar.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/CIFAR-AI-Insights-EN-FINAL-AODA.pdf. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 Information technology - Artificial intelligence - Overview of trustworthiness in artificial intelligence. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:isoiec:tr:24028:ed-1:v1:en. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Collins Dictionary. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/artificial-intelligence. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Encyclopedia Britannica. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Стратегія розвитку штучного інтелекту в Україні: монографія. Кол. авт. [За заг. ред. А. І. Шевченка]. Київ: ІПШІ, 2023. 305 с.

Aixploria. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.aixploria.com/en/ Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Polityka dla rozwoju sztucznej inteligencji w Polsce od roku 2020. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/mp-monitor-polski/ustanowienie-polityki-dla-rozwoju-sztucznej-inteligencji-w-polsce-od-19070233. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

AI in the UK: ready, willing and able? House of Lords, Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (Report of Session 2017–19, HL Paper 100, published 16 April 2018). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldai/100/100.pdf. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Nicky Lung. Singapore announces initiatives on AI governance and ethics. June 5, 2018. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.opengovasia.com/singapore-announces-initiatives-on-ai-governance-and-ethics/ Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. Making Automated Systems Work for the American People. The White House. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/ Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Г. Андрощук. Стратегія розвитку штучного інтелекту в Польщі. Юридична газета онлайн. 15 вересня 2020. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/zahist-intelektualnoyi-vlasnosti-avtorske-pravo/strategiya-rozvitku-shtuchnogo-intelektu-v-polshchi-.html. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Global AI Vibrancy Tool [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://aiindex.stanford.edu/vibrancy/ Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2024 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts (COM(2021)0206 – C9-0146/2021 – 2021/0106(COD)). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0138_EN.html. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Олена Пістракевич. Стратегії розвитку штучного інтелекту в Європейському Союзі (на прикладі країн Вишеградської групи). Міжнародні відносини, суспільні комунікації та регіональні студії. № 1 (9). 2021. С. 160-174. doi: https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2021-01-160-174.

B. Hecht, L. Wilcox, J. P. Bigham, J. Schöning, E. Hoque, J. Ernst, Y. Bisk, L. De Russis, L. Yarosh, B. Anjum, D. Contractor, and C. Wu, 2018. It’s Time to Do Something: Mitigating the Negative Impacts of Computing Through a Change to the Peer Review Process. ACM Future of Computing Blog. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://acm-fca.org/2018/03/29/negativeimpacts/ Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

B. Moorhouse , M. Yeo & Y.Wan (2023) Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151.

L. Kohnke, B.L. Moorhouse, D. Zou ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54 (2) (2023), pp. 537-550, doi:10.1177/00336882231162868.

O. Siddique. Can academics tell the difference between AI-generated and human-authored content? Times Higher Education. 15 Feb. 2024. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://surl.li/rnlkb. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

How to cite ChatGPT American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000.

J. B. Lyons, K. Hobbs, S. Rogers & S.H. Clouse (2023). Responsible (use of) AI. Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, 4. doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1201777.

A.Monasterio Astobiza, T. Ausín, B. Liedo, M. Toboso, M. Aparicio & D. López, (2022, April). Ethical governance of AI in the global south: a human rights approach to responsible use of AI. In Proceedings (Vol. 81, No. 1, p. 136). MDPI. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/proceedings2022081136.

J. Dien, (2023). Generative artificial intelligence as a plagiarism problem. Biological Psychology, 108621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108621.

Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Official site. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2024). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024

Best Practice Guidelines on Research Integrity and Publishing Ethics. Wiley Author Services. Official site Wiley (2020). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://authorservices.wiley.com/ethics-guidelines/index.html. Дата звернення: 22.03.2024


REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment, [Online]. Available: https://coara.eu. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

J. Osborne, D. Pimentel, B. Alberts, D. Allchin, S. Barzilai, C. Bergstrom, J. Coffey, B. Donovan, K. Kivinen, A. Kozyreva, & S. Wineburg (2022). Science Education in an Age of Misinformation. Stanford University, Stanford, CA. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2434623/science_education_in_an_age_of_misinformation/3456215/ Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

O. Pinchuk and I. Malytska (2020). Effective peer review of publications as a guarantee of the quality of scientific publications. Theory and Practice of Social Systems Management, 4, 64–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-7782.2020.4.06. (in Ukrainian)

L. A. Luparenko (2014). Tools for detecting plagiarism in scientific works: analysis of software solutions. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 40(2), 151–169. doi: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v40i2.1050. (in Ukrainian)

О. G. Kuzminska, L. A. Luparenko, O. Pinchuk, Master class "Ethical principles of publication of scientific research results: prevention of plagiarism". Collection of materials of the international scientific and practical conf. "Open science in the context of integration of Ukrainian education into the European research area", OS-UA-ERA-2023, (27 April. 2023), pp. 95-103. [Online]. Available: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/id/eprint/736228. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in Ukrainian)

L. Korn and N. Davidovitch (2016). The Profile of Academic Offenders: Features of Students Who Admit to Academic Dishonesty. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 22, 3043–3055. doi: https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.898810. (in English)

S. A. Wowra (2007). Moral identities, social anxiety, and academic dishonesty among American college students. Ethics & Behavior, 17, 303-321.(in English)

S. Béland, J. S. Bureau and M. Peters (2020). Plagier en temps de pandémie. Évaluer. Journal international de recherche en éducation et formation, Numéro Hors-série, 1, 35-40. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341078872_Plagier_en_temps_de_pandemie Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in French)

Julia Chen. Four directions for assessment redesign in the age of generative AI. THE - Times Higher Education. 21 Jul 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/four-directions-assessment-redesign-age-generative-ai. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

B. Moorhouse, M. Yeo and Y. Wan (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open. 5(2023).100151 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151. (in English)

Q. Vidal, S. Vincent-Lancrin and H. Yun (2023), "Emerging governance of generative AI in education", in OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023: Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem, OECD Publishing, Paris, doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/2a73a245-en. (in English)

Institute for Digitalisation of Education of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine (2023, 27 April). Master class "Ethical principles of publishing research results: prevention of plagiarism". YouTube. [Online Video]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYjMBDnJIXY&t=1s. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in Ukrainian)

T. M. Culley (2014). APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no. Applications in Plant Sciences, 2: 1400055. doi: https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400055. (in English)

I.Jarić (2016). High time for a common plagiarism detection system. Scientometrics. 106, 457–459. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1756-6. (in English)

S. Kannan & S. Gowri (2014). Anti-plagiarism software in biomedical literature. Journal of Scientometric Research, 3(2), 93–94. (in English)

A.Marusic, V. Katavic and M. Marusic (2007). Role of editors and journals in detecting and preventing scientific misconduct: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Medicine and Law, 26, 545–566. (in English)

T. Mala and T. V. Geetha (2007). Visualization of Plagiarism Detected in Documents. International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications (ICCIMA 2007), 92-96, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIMA.2007.109. (in English)

A Culture of Ethical AI: Report JULY 2022. [Online]. Available: https://cifar.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/CIFAR-AI-Insights-EN-FINAL-AODA.pdf. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 Information technology - Artificial intelligence - Overview of trustworthiness in artificial intelligence. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:isoiec:tr:24028:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

Collins Dictionary. [Online]. Available: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/artificial-intelligence. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

Encyclopedia Britannica. [Online]. Available: https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in Ukraine: a monograph. Collective of authors [Edited by A.I. Shevchenko]. Kyiv: IPSI, 2023. 305 p.

Aixploria. [Online]. Available: https://www.aixploria.com/en/ Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

Polityka dla rozwoju sztucznej inteligencji w Polsce od roku 2020. [Online]. Available: https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/mp-monitor-polski/ustanowienie-polityki-dla-rozwoju-sztucznej-inteligencji-w-polsce-od-19070233. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in Polish)

AI in the UK: ready, willing and able? House of Lords, Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (Report of Session 2017–19, HL Paper 100, published 16 April 2018). [Online]. Available: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldai/100/100.pdf. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

Nicky Lung. Singapore announces initiatives on AI governance and ethics. June 5, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.opengovasia.com/singapore-announces-initiatives-on-ai-governance-and-ethics/ Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights. Making Automated Systems Work for the American People. The White House. [Online]. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/ Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

G. Androściuk. Strategy for the development of artificial intelligence in Poland. Yurydychna Gazeta Online. 15 September 2020. [Online]. Available: https://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/zahist-intelektualnoyi-vlasnosti-avtorske-pravo/strategiya-rozvitku-shtuchnogo-intelektu-v-polshchi-.html. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in Ukrainian)

Global AI Vibrancy Tool. [Online]. Available: https://aiindex.stanford.edu/vibrancy/ Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2024 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts (COM(2021)0206 – C9-0146/2021 – 2021/0106(COD)). [Online]. Available: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2024-0138_EN.html. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

Olena Pistrakevych. Strategies for the Development of Artificial Intelligence in the European Union (on the Example of the Visegrad Countries). International Relations, Public Communications and Regional Studies. № 1 (9). 2021. С. 160-174. doi: https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2021-01-160-174. (in Ukrainian)

B. Hecht, L. Wilcox, J. P. Bigham, J. Schöning, E. Hoque, J. Ernst, Y. Bisk, L. De Russis, L. Yarosh, B. Anjum, D. Contractor, and C. Wu, 2018. It’s Time to Do Something: Mitigating the Negative Impacts of Computing Through a Change to the Peer Review Process. ACM Future of Computing Blog. [Online]. Available: https://acm-fca.org/2018/03/29/negativeimpacts/ Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

B. Moorhouse , M. Yeo and Y.Wan (2023) Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities. Computers and Education. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151. (in English)

L. Kohnke, B.L. Moorhouse, D. Zou, ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54 (2) (2023), pp. 537-550, doi:10.1177/00336882231162868. (in English)

O. Siddique, Can academics tell the difference between AI-generated and human-authored content? Times Higher Education. 15 Feb. 2024. [Online]. Available: http://surl.li/rnlkb. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

How to cite ChatGPT American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000. (in English)

J. B. Lyons, K. Hobbs, S. Rogers and S.H. Clouse (2023). Responsible (use of) AI. Frontiers in Neuroergonomics, 4. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1201777. (in English)

A.Monasterio Astobiza, T. Ausín, B. Liedo, M. Toboso, M. Aparicio and D. López, (2022, April). Ethical governance of AI in the global south: a human rights approach to responsible use of AI. In Proceedings (Vol. 81, No. 1, p. 136). MDPI. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/proceedings2022081136. (in English)

J. Dien, (2023). Generative artificial intelligence as a plagiarism problem. Biological Psychology, 108621. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108621. (in English)

Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Official site. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2024). [Online]. Available: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

Best Practice Guidelines on Research Integrity and Publishing Ethics. Wiley Author Services. Official site Wiley (2020). [Online]. Available: https://authorservices.wiley.com/ethics-guidelines/index.html. Accessed: March 22, 2024 (in English)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Olha Pinchuk, Iryna Malytska

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.