Keywords
higher education
algorithmic thinking
measurable and observable algorithmic thinking content
KSA statements
How to Cite
Abstract
Nowadays algorithmic thinking, as a key demand and the main requirement of technology-based society, extensively expands outwards the computer science area and rapidly becomes a meaningful instrumentality for effective realization of any information activities with or without ICT. This instrumentality creates new opportunities and possibilities for improvement of the effectiveness of any educational professional activities in the higher education context by creating problem-solving algorithms completely within the ICT area, as well as non-ICT-based algorithms that provide clear technological step-by-step instructions for solving a diversity of educational problems.
Although attention to algorithmic thinking as scientific phenomenon is increasing, the studies aimed at determining the algorithmic thinking content in observable and measurable statements have not been conducted yet and its great potential is still undiscovered.
The purpose of this study is to identify, clarify, and categorize algorithmic thinking content in observable and measurable knowledge, skills, and abilities statements (KSAs).
The study is a mixed-methods type of development research carried out in 4 stages: 1) extraction of the KSA statements from the extant scientific literature related to algorithmic thinking; 2) design of The Algorithmic Thinking Content Survey (ATCS) based on the five steps Universal Sequence of an Algorithm Development (USAD); 3) administration of the ATCS on a wide variety of educational professionals (N = 117); 4) data analysis aimed to obtain the content of algorithmic thinking in observable and measurable KSA statements.
The design of the ATCS is also based on algorithmic thinking as a complex phenomenon that integrates five types of thinking: abstract, logical, figurative, conceptual, and constructive.
The administration of the ATCS involved 117 experts – educational professionals (11 professors who teach courses concerning algorithms and computer science, 23 practicing teachers of informatics, 35 students in the 3rd year of Informatics teacher training program, and 48 master students of informatics). Expert validation of algorithmic thinking content in knowledge, skills, and abilities statements was obtained through the Likert scale.
One hundred KSA statements of algorithmic thinking content were obtained (32 statements of knowledge, 38 statements of skills, and 30 statements of abilities).
References
L. Zsakó, P. Szlávi. “ICT Competences: Algorithmic Thinking” in Acta Didactica Napocensia, no. 5(2), pp. 49-58, 2012. (in English)
M. Hrubý. “The importance of students’ algorithmic thinking skill improvement”, in IT Tools - Good Practice of Effective Use in Education, Studio-Noa for University of Silesia, Katowice-Cieszyn, p. 383-390, 2015. (in English)
M. Kovalchuk. “Semantic aspects of algorithmic thinking” in Physical and mathematical education, no. 3 (17), p. 61-66, 2018. (in Ukrainian)
R. Tadevosyan, O. Shevchuk. “About the problem of formation of algorithmic thinking” in Scientific notes of Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University named after Mykhailo Kotsyubynsky. Series: Pedagogy and psychology, no. 41, pp. 93-101, 2014. (in Ukrainian)
G. Geda, Cs. Bíró. “A Possible Way to Develop Algorithmic Thinking” in Acta Didactica Napocensia, no. 13(1), pp. 19-28, 2020. (in English)
V. Vdovenko. “Formation of algorithmic thinking of junior schoolchildren in computer science lessons” in Scientific notes of KSPU. Series: Problems of methods of physical-mathematical and technological education, no. 11 (4), pp. 23-27, 2017. (in Ukrainian)
M. Kovalchuk, A. Voievoda, E. Prozor. “Algorithmic Thinking as the Meaningful Component of Cognitive Competencies of the Future Engineer” in Universal Journal of Educational Research, no.8(11B), pp. 6248-6255, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.082263. (in English)
J. Quaicoe, M. Laanpere, K. Pata, N. Hoić-Božić, R. Rõbtšenkov. “Games for learning algorithmic thinking (GLAT) project: perceived factors accounting for teacher acceptance and usage of a new learning scenarios design tool – the LEPLANNER” in Proceedings of EDULEARN19 Conference (1st-3rd July 2019), pp. 7898-7906, 2019. (in English)
S. Chuechote, A. Nokkaew, A, Phongsasithorn, P. Laosinchai. “A Neo-Piagetian Analysis of Algorithmic Thinking Development through the “Sorted” Digital Game” in Contemporary educational technology, no. 12(1), ep261, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.685959. (in English)
J. Hromkovič, T. Kohn, D. Komm, G. Serafini. “Examples of Algorithmic Thinking in Programming Education” in Olympiads in Informatics, vol. 10, pp. 111-124, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.15388/ioi.2016.08. (in English)
J. Mezak, P. Papak “Learning scenarios and encouraging algorithmic thinking” in 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 0760-0765. 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400141. (in English)
D. Gonda, V. Duriš, A. Tirpáková, G. Pavlovicová. “Teaching Algorithms to Develop the Algorithmic Thinking of Informatics Students” in Mathematics, no. 10, 3857. 13 p. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203857. (in English)
B. Burton. “Encouraging algorithmic thinking without a computer” in Olympiads in Informatics, vol. 4, pp. 3-14, 2010. (in English)
Ç. Güler. “Algorithmic Thinking Skills without Computers for Prospective Computer Science Teachers” in Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, no. 14(4), pp. 570-585, 2021. (in English)
M. Byrka, A. Sushchenko, A. Svatiev, V. Mazin, and O. Veritov. “A New Dimension of Learning in Higher Education: Algorithmic Thinking” in Propósitos y Representaciones, no. 9(SPE2), e990, 2021. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE2.990. (in English)
M. Byrka. “Prospective directions of research on the problem of algorithmic thinking” in Pedagogy of creative personality formation in higher and secondary schools, no. 87, pp. 29-33, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.32840/1992-5786.2023.87.4. (in Ukrainian)
A. Ritzhaupt, M. Florence, R. Pastore, K. Youngju. “Development and validation of the educational technologist competencies survey (ETCS): knowledge, skills, and abilities” in Journal of Computing in Higher Education, no. 30, pp. 3-33, 2018. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9163-z. (in English)
J. Hlavac. “Knowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) as a metric to re-conceptualise aptitude: a multi-stakeholder perspective” in The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, vol. 17:1, pp. 29-53, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2023.2170052. (in English)
N. Waights Hickman. “Knowing in the ‘Executive Way’: Knowing How, Rules, Methods, Principles and Criteria” in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 99, issue. 2, pp. 311-335, 2019. doi https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12488. (in English)
M. Byrka, A. Sushchenko, T. Lukashiv. “Components of ICT competence of teachers of mathematics and informatics” in Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 225-237, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v74i6.3258. (in English)
J. G. Ladwig, A. McPherson. “The anatomy of ability” in Curriculum Inquiry, vol. 47, issue 4, pp. 344-362, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2017.1368352. (in English)
R. E. Almagro, L. C. Flores, M. R. V. Amora. “Perceived Algorithmic Autonomy-Support and Computer Attitude on Learning Management Systems in Higher Education Institutions in Davao Region” in International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(12), 738-757, 2023. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7012057. (in English)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Marian Byrka, Andrii Sushchenko, Volodymyr Luchko, Galina Perun, Victoria Luchko