Keywords
AI-based applications
research
Open Science
Ukrainian universities
How to Cite
Abstract
The study seeks to explore the key opportunities and risks associated with the use of AI-based applications in research conducted by Ukrainian universities.
Findings reveal that the use of AI-based applications among Ukrainian university academic staff is limited. However, we identified certain patterns in how respondents perceive the key opportunities and risks in using AI-based applications in research. These perceptions are largely shaped by expert opinions from mass and social media, as well as scientific literature discussing AI's influence on research. In contrast, respondents' personal experience with AI-based applications plays a lesser role in shaping their views. However, there are notable differences in the experiences of using AI-based applications across various fields of expertise.
Among the most significant opportunities identified by respondents are the ability of AI-based applications to automate routine tasks, gather information from numerous sources, and accelerate the processing of large datasets. However, expectations regarding AI-based applications’ potential to enhance research quality, offer unconventional insights, or detect anomalies and patterns are more limited. Respondents also showed little belief in AI-based applications’ capacity to streamline the research process, improve scientific writing quality, boost research efficiency, or develop new skills for researchers.
Alongside these opportunities, respondents pointed to substantial risks, such as the unreliability of published research findings, compromised research integrity, the unethical use of AI-based applications in generating reviews by dishonest reviewers, and the need for more thorough peer review processes. Concerns also included a potential decline in research quality and an increase in plagiarism cases. However, respondents did not express major concerns regarding ethical issues like data privacy, ghost authorship, or dishonesty and irresponsibility in the use of AI systems.
The results underscore the importance of implementing institutional policies and enhancing the skills of academic staff in using AI-based applications to improve research quality.
References
Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence, “Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2023”, 2023. [Online]. Available:: https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/HAI_AI-Index-Report_2023.pdf (in English)
T. Williams. “GPT-4’s launch ‘another step change’ for AI and higher education”.2023 [Online]. Available: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/gpt-4s-launch-another-step-change-ai-and-higher-education (in English)
European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Artificial Intelligence for Europe. 2018 [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2018:237:FIN (in English)
O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond та F. Gouverneur, “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?”, Int. J. Educ.al Technol. Higher Educ., vol. 16, no 1, 2019.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0. (in English)
S. Kalashnikova, (Ed.), Teaching Excellence in Higher Education: Theory and Practice. Kyiv: Inst. Higher Educ. NAES Ukraine, 2023.https://doi.org/10.31874/TE.2023. (in Ukrainian)
Sysoieva, S. O., & Osadcha, K. P. “Condition, Technologies and Prospects of Distance Learning in the Higher Education of Ukraine”. Inf. Technol. Learn. Tools, vol.70 no.2, pp. 271-284. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v70i2.2907. (in Ukrainian)
M. Shyshkina, M., & Yu. Nosenko, Yu. (2023). “Promising Technologies with Elements of AI for Professional Development of Teaching”. Phys. and Math. Educat., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 66–71, Feb. 2023 https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2023-038-1-010. (in Ukrainian)
N. Nychkalo, N. Lazarenko, & R. Gurevych, R. (2022). “Informatization and Digitalization of Society in the 21st Century: New Challenges for Institutions of Higher Education”. Modern Inf. Technol. Innov. Methodologies Educ. Professional Training Methodol. Theory Experience Problems, no. 60, pp. 17–29, Sep. 2022,https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2021-60-17-29. (in Ukrainian)
O. Yara, A. Brazheyev, L. Golovko, and V. Bashkatova, “Legal Regulation of the Use of Artificial Intelligence: Problems and Development Prospects”, Eur. J. Sustain. Develop., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 281, Feb. 2021,https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p281. (in Ukrainian)
M. Velykanova, N. Korchak, O. Klepikova, D. Kibets-Pashutina and O. Shyrokova-Murarash, “Artificial Intelligence: Legal Status Determination”, Law, State Telecommun. Rev., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 68–80, Oct. 2022.https://doi.org/10.26512/lstr.v14i2.41802. (in Ukrainian)
O. Romanchuk, & V. Romanchuk, “Artificial intelligence: “experimental philosophy” or a requirement of reality?” J. Educators, Teachers Trainers, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 146-153. 2021. https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2021.12.04.020. (in English)
Kovachоv, & Ya. Suchikova, “Talk to me: A dialogue with artificial intelligence about its use in education and research” Scientific papers Berdiansk State Pedagogical Univ. Ser. Pedagogical sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–55, Jun. 2023.https://doi.org/10.31494/2412-9208-2023-1-1-43-55. (in Ukrainian)
T. Alqahtani et al., “The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research”, Res. Social Administ. Pharmacy, Jun.2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.016. (in English)
E. Schmidt. “This is how AI will transform the way science gets done”. MIT Technology Review. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/07/05/1075865 (in English)
1J. M. Buriak et al., “Best Practices for Using AI When Writing Scientific Manuscripts”, ACS Nano, vol.17, no.5, pp. 4091-4093, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01544. (in English)
R. Thomas, U. Bhosale, K. Shukla та A. Kapadia, “Impact and perceived value of the revolutionary advent of artificial intelligence in research and publishing among researchers: a survey-based descriptive study”, Sci. Editing, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27–34, Feb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.294. (in English)
A. I. Pisica, T. Edu, R. M. Zaharia та R. Zaharia, “Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Pros and Cons from the Perspectives of Academics”, Societies, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 118, May 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13050118. (in English)
M. Bearman, J. Ryan та R. Ajjawi, “Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: a critical literature review”, Higher Educ., Oct. 2022.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2. (in English)
K. Flanagan, & P. Ferri, AI and scientific productivity: Considering policy and governance challenges. In Artificial Intelligence in Science: Challenges, Opportunities and the Future of Research, Paris: OECD Publishing. pp. 271-278. 2023.https://doi.org/10.1787/a8d820bd-en. (in English)
R. Anderson, T. Vines, & J. Miles, J. SSP Conference Debate: AI and the Integrity of Scholarly Publishing. The Scholarly Kitchen. Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/06/27/ssp-conference-debate-ai-and-the-integrity-of-scholarly-publishing/ (in English)
T. Hey, “Artificial intelligence for science and engineering: A priority for public investment in research and development”. Artificial Intelligence in Science: Challenges, Opportunities and the Future of Research. Paris: OECD Publishing. pp. 245-250. 2023.https://doi.org/10.1787/a8d820bd-en. (in English)
H.-W. Cheng, “Challenges and Limitations of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research: A Perspective from Organic Materials”, AI, vol. 4, no.2, pp. 401–405, May 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai4020021. (in English)
K. Wang, “Opportunities in Open Science With AI”, Front. Big Data, vol. 2, Sep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00026. (in English)
H. Piwowar, “Value all research products”, Nature, vol. 493, no. 7431, p. 159, Jan. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/493159a. (in English)
J.-C. Burgelman et al, “Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century”, Front. Big Data, vol. 2, Dec. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00043. (in English)
C. Metz, “The Godfather of A.I.’ Leaves Google and Warns of Danger Ahead”. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/01/technology/ai-google-chatbot-engineer-quits-hinton.html (in English)
P. Tsigaris and J. A. Teixeira da Silva, “The role of ChatGPT in scholarly editing and publishing”, Eur. Sci. Editing, vol. 49, May 2023. https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2023.e101121. (in English)
G. Conroy, “Scientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch – but is it any good?” Nature. Jul.2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02218-z (in English)
W. Holmes et al “Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework”, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., vol. 32, no.3, pp. 504-526. Apr. 2021.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1. (in English)
J. Y. Bai, O. Zawacki-Richter, & W. Muskens, “Developing Strategic Scenarios for Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education”. In 5th International Open and Distance Learning Conference Proceedings Book, pp. 47-70. 2022. Eskişehir: Anadolu University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7488343. (in English)
Nature. “Tools such as CHATGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use”. Nature, 612-612. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1. (in English)
COPE. “Authorship and AI tools”. Feb. 13, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author (in English)
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2014, July 1). Law of Ukraine No. 1556-VII, “On Higher Education”. [Online]. Available: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18#Text (In Ukrainian)
2L. Ungerer та S. Slade, “Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence in Learning Analytics in Distance Education Contexts”, Learn. Analytics Open Distrib. Learn., pp. 105–120, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0786-9_8. (in English)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Oleksandra Borodiyenko, Iryna Drach, Nataliia Bazeliuk, Olha Petroye, Iryna Reheilo, Oleksandr Bazeliuk, Olena Slobodianiuk