USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO IDENTIFY AND CORRECT MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT RADIATION
PDF

Keywords

artificial intelligence tools
radiation literacy
radiation safety
radiation awareness
university students

How to Cite

[1]
O. Tymoshchuk, “USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO IDENTIFY AND CORRECT MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT RADIATION”, ITLT, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 189–203, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v105i1.5905.

Abstract

The expansion of nuclear technologies in various industries, combined with the constant threat of radiation-related incidents, highlights the urgent need for effective radiation education. This study is devoted to an empirical investigation of the effectiveness of artificial intelligence tools (neurological models of artificial intelligence) in detecting and correcting

of artificial intelligence tools (neurological models of artificial intelligence) in detecting and correcting misconceptions about radiation (ionising radiation). We empirically evaluate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in detecting and correcting these misconceptions among university students, focusing on different cognitive, cognitive-activity, and systemic-axiological levels. A pedagogical experiment was conducted with 168 students of Ukrainian universities using control questionnaires to assess the effectiveness of the selected artificial intelligence tools. The experiment involved presenting students with a series of statements designed to identify misconceptions related to factual knowledge (e.g., radiation units, background levels), conceptual understanding (e.g., the difference between radiation and radioactivity, effects of low-dose exposure), and application/evaluation (e.g., risk assessment, protective measures).

AI tools, including natural language processing models for text analysis and machine learning algorithms for misconceptions classification, were used to provide personalised feedback and targeted corrective information. The results show that AI achieved high accuracy (80-98%) in eliminating misconceptions about factual knowledge. However, the effectiveness decreased for misconceptions requiring deeper conceptual understanding (73-78%) and is much lower for those involving complex knowledge assessment and application (24-36%). These findings indicate that while AI has significant potential to improve basic radiation literacy and provide automated feedback, its current capabilities are limited in addressing more multidimensional and complex misconceptions. Further research is needed to develop more sophisticated AI-based integrations that can effectively target higher-order cognitive skills and promote a more complete understanding of radiation science and its implications. This study contributes to this field by providing empirical evidence on the strengths and weaknesses of AI in radiation education, and offers practical recommendations for the further development and implementation of customised AI-based learning tools.

PDF

References

Rodrigues, B. V., Lopes, P. C., Mello-Moura, A. C., Flores-Fraile, J., & Veiga, N. (2024, October). Literacy in the Scope of Radiation Protection for Healthcare Professionals Exposed to Ionizing Radiation: A Systematic Review. In Healthcare (Vol. 12, No. 20, p. 2033). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12202033

Gil‐Perez, D., & Carrascosa, J. (1990). What to do about science “misconceptions”. Science Education, 74(5), 531-540.

B. Drottz and L. Sjöberg, "Risk perception and worries after the Chernobyl accident," Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 135–149, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80124-0. (in English)

V. Ramana, "Nuclear power and the public," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 43–51, 2011. DOI: DOI:10.1177/0096340211413358. (in English)

P. Slovic, "The perception gap: Radiation and risk," Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 67–75, 2012. DOI: 10.1177/0096340212444870. DOI: 10.1177/00963402124448. (in English)

O. Tymoshchuk, "Current trends in radiation safety education in the digital educational environment: Challenges and opportunities," Scientia et Societus, vol. 22, pp. 22–30, 2023. DOI: 10.69587/ss/2.2023.22. (in English)

M. U. Demirezen, O. Yilmaz, and E. Ince, "New models developed for detection of misconceptions in physics with artificial intelligence," Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 9225–9251, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-023-07814-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-023-08414-2. (in English)

M. Shoaib, N. Sayed, J. Singh, J. Shafi, S. Khan, and F. Ali, "AI student success predictor: Enhancing personalized learning in campus management systems," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 158, p. 108301, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108301. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108301. (in English)

S. Sutrisno, M. Maison, J. Marzal, and W. Kurniawan, "Rapid Artificial Diagnostic Test in Intelligent Teacher Assistant System (ITAS) to Identify Misconceptions on Kinematics," in Mathematics and Science Education International Seminar 2021 (MASEIS 2021), Atlantis Press, Mar. 2023, pp. 316–324. DOI: 10.2991/assehr.k.220407.051. DOI: 10.2991/978-2-38476-012-1_39. (in English)

D. D. Vento and A. Fanfarillo, "Traps, pitfalls and misconceptions of machine learning applied to scientific disciplines," in Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (Learning), 2019, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1145/3332186.3332209. (in English)

N. L. Bragazzi and S. Garbarino, "Assessing the accuracy of generative conversational artificial intelligence in debunking sleep health myths: Mixed methods comparative study with expert analysis," JMIR Formative Research, vol. 8, no. 1, e55762, 2024. DOI: 10.2196/55762. (in English)

L. Messeri and M. J. Crockett, "Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research," Nature, vol. 627, no. 8002, pp. 49–58, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-023-00754-7. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0. (in English)

V. J. Owan, K. B. Abang, D. O. Idika, E. O. Etta, and B. A. Bassey, "Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment," Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 19, no. 8, em2307, 2023. DOI: 10.29333/ejmste/13428. (in English)

A. Boiko, N. Shevtsova, S. Yashanov, O. Tymoshchuk, and V. Parzhnytskyi, "The impact of the integration of artificial intelligence on changes in the education process of Ukraine: Prospects and challenges," Revista Eduweb, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 180–189, 2024. DOI: 10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.01.13. (in English)

K. Wong, F. Gallant, and E. Szumacher, "Perceptions of Canadian radiation oncologists, radiation physicists, radiation therapists and radiation trainees about the impact of artificial intelligence in radiation oncology—national survey," Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 44–48, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.11.013. (in English)

Horz, H., & Schnotz, W. (2010). Cognitive load in learning with multiple representations. Cognitive load theory, 229-252. (in English)

Holmes, W. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. (in English)

S. Salisu, O. M. Alyasiri, H. A. Younis, T. M. Sahib, A. H. Ali, A. A. Noor, and I. M. Hayder, "Measuring the effectiveness of AI tools in clinical research and writing: A case study in healthcare," Mesopotamian Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, pp. 8–15, 2024. DOI: 10.58496/MJAIH/2024/002. (in English)

J. Ayling and A. Chapman, "Putting AI ethics to work: Are the tools fit for purpose?," AI and Ethics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 405–429, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s43681-021-00084-x. (in English)

M. Elkhatat, K. Elsaid, and S. Almeer, "Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text," International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 17, 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5. (in English)

L. Zheng, J. Niu, L. Zhong, and J. F. Gyasi, "The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis," Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 5650–5664, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2046092. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693. (in English)

Q. Sarwari and H. M. Adnan, "The effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) on daily educational activities of undergraduates in a modern and diversified university environment," Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 927–930, 2024. DOI: 10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.004. (in English)

Z. Hou, "Research on adopting artificial intelligence technology to improve the effectiveness of vocational college English learning," in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1744, no. 4, p. 042122, 2021. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1744/4/042122. (in English)

M. L. B. M. Khidir, S. N. B. Saari, and M. Z. F. B. M. Zawawi, "The effectiveness of artificial intelligence chatbot for teaching computer-aided design (AutoCAD) in Polimas," EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), pp. 208–214, 2022. DOI: 10.36713/epra10334. (in English)

S. Harrison, M. Back, and D. Tatar, "‘It’s just a method!’ A pedagogical experiment in interdisciplinary design," in Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 261–270, 2006. DOI: 10.1145/1142405.114244. (in English)

B. J. Byiers, B. Pennington, B. N. Rudolph, and A. L. Ford, "Perspectives on the use of quantitative analysis in single-case experimental research," Journal of Behavioral Education, vol. 30, pp. 444–454, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s10864-020-09386-2. (in English)

O. Tymoshchuk, "Substantiation of the structure of radiation literacy of future science teachers," Scientific Bulletin of the Vinnytsia Academy of Continuing Education. Series "Pedagogy. Psychology"», no. 1, pp. 178–183, 2024. DOI: 10.32782/academ-ped.psyh-2024-1.26. (in Ukrainian)

National Commission for Radiation Protection of the Population of Ukraine, Radiation Safety Standards of Ukraine (NRBU-97). [Online]. Available: https://www.insc.gov.ua/docs/nrbu97.pdf. (in Ukrainian)

J. E. Martin, Physics for Radiation Protection: A Handbook, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2006. DOI: 10.1002/0471719939. (in English)

International Atomic Energy Agency, Publications. [Online]. Available: https://www.iaea.org/publications. (in English)

State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine, NRA Search. [Online]. Available: https://snriu.gov.ua/npasearch. (in Ukrainian)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Oleksandr Tymoshchuk

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.