Keywords
self efficacy
research self efficacy
teacher candidates
How to Cite
Abstract
This study examines the impact of the Computer-Assisted Flipped Learning Model (CAFLM) on the research self-efficacy (RSE) of pre-service teacher candidates, particularly in pre-school and special education departments. Utilizing a two-group pretest-posttest experimental design, 61 participants (31 pre-school and 30 special education teacher candidates) were assessed over a 16-week scientific research methods course. The Scientific Research Self-Efficacy Scale (SRSES), consisting of six components and 37 items, was used as the data collection instrument. The key findings reveal a significant improvement in participants' RSE, with no considerable differences observed between the two departments. In this study, the CAFLM, which involves engaging with instructional content (e.g., educational videos, digital materials, and online resources) before class and applying that knowledge through interactive classroom activities played a central role. The use of digital tools not only enabled flexible and self-paced learning but also supported independent problem-solving and collaborative learning processes, both of which are crucial for fostering mastery experiences that enhance self-efficacy. Participants engaged in watching preparatory videos, participating in in-class discussions, and writing research reports, all supported through computer-assisted platforms. The results showed considerable improvement in overall RSE and in most of the sub-dimensions. Although no statistically significant differences were found in the post-test results of the "definition of the problem" (DP) and "identification of the hypothesis" (IH) subscales, increases in scores were observed. Ultimately, both groups demonstrated improved research self-efficacy following various computer-supported research tasks. The findings suggest that while the field of study does not significantly influence the effectiveness of FLM, the integration of computer assistance within the FLM framework can significantly enhance research skills and self-efficacy among teacher candidates.
References
[1] O. Nacaroğlu, O. Bektaş and M. Tüysüz, “Examining the emotional semantic orientation of gifted students towards the flipped learning model,” Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 117-142, 2023, doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09581-8. (in English)
[2] X. Sun, F. Mollaee and S. Izadpanah, “Impact of flipped learning on reflective thinking and goal orientation among English foreign language learners” Computer Assisted Language Learning, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2430718. (in English)
[3] L. Zhao, X. Liu and Y. Su, “The differentiate effect of self-efficacy, motivation, and satisfaction on pre-service teacher students’ learning achievement in a flipped classroom: A Case of a modern educational technology course,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 5: 2888, 2021, doi.org/10.3390/SU13052888. (in English)
[4] S. Aslan, “Using cooperative learning and the flipped classroom model with prospective teachers to increase digital literacy self-efficacy, technopedagogical education, and 21st-century skills competence,” International Journal of Progressive Education, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 121-137, 2022, doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.439.9. (in English)
[5] Y. Sun, X. Zhao, X. Li and F. Yu, “Effectiveness of the flipped classroom on self-efficacy among students: A meta-analysis,” Cogent Education, vol. 10, no. 2: 2287886, 2023, doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2287886. (in English)
[6] I. Sever, B. Öncül and A. Ersoy, “Using flipped learning to improve scientific research skills of teacher candidates,” Universal Journal of Educational Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 521-535, 2019, doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070225. (in English)
[7] A. Akçöltekin, “The development of the teachers’ self-efficacy scale regarding scientific researches,” Kastamonu Education Journal, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2713–2727, 2019, doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3707. (in Turkish)
[8] L. Abeysekera and P. Dawson, “Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2015, doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336. (in English)
[9] S. Aşiroğlu, “The Effects of the flipped classroom model applied in the research methods course in post-graduate programs on students,” E-International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 230-245, 2023, doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1291995. (in English)
[10] M. Y. Doo and C. J. Bonk, “The effects of self-efficacy, self-regulation and social presence on learning engagement in a large university class using flipped learning,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 997–1010, 2020, doi.org/0.1111/jcal.12455. (in English)
[11] J. F. Strayer, “Inverting the classroom: A study of the learning environment when an intelligent tutoring system is used to help students learn,” 2009, Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Müller. (in English)
[12] N. T. T. Thai, B. De Wever and M. Valcke, “The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback,” Computers & Education, VOL. 107, pp. 113-126, 2017, doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003. (in English)
[13] X. A. Zhou, “Conceptual review of the effectiveness of flipped learning in vocational learners' cognitive skills and emotional states,” Front Psychol. vol. 13, no. 13:1039025, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039025. (in English)
[14] S. Woodcock, U. Sharma, P. Subban and E. Hitches, “Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices: Rethinking teachers’ engagement with inclusive practices,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 117, no. 103802, 2022, doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103802. (in English)
[15] A. M. AlJaser, “Effectiveness of using flipped classroom strategy in academic achievement and self-efficacy among education students of princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University,” English Language Teaching, vol. 10, no. 4, Article 67, 2017, doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n4p67. (in English)
[16] E. Namaziandost and F. Çakmak, “An account of EFL learners’ self-efficacy and gender in the flipped classroom model,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 414–429, 2020, doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10167-7. (in English)
[17] O. Kızkapan, “Student science teachers’ research self-efficacy: Does it develop in a flipped course and predict achievement?,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 2912-2924, 2023, doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2163262. (in English)
[18] W. N. Yanuarto, A. Jaelani and J. Purwanto, “Flipped classroom model: Empowering digital literacy for mathematics learning in society 5.0.” Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 158-171, 2021. (in English)
[19] A. S. Saracaloğlu, N. Yenice and B. Özden, “An analysis of prospective science, social sciences and primary school teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions and focus of academic control,” Pamukkale University Journal of Education Faculty, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 227-250, 2013. (in Turkish)
[20] M. Liu, “Flipped for critical thinking: Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in postgraduate law modules,” Education Applications & Developments, pp. 252-256, 2019, doi.org/10.36315/2019v1end053. (in English)
[21] J. Bishop and M. A Verleger, “The flipped classroom: A survey of the research” Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. 10.18260/1-2—22585. (in English)
[22] A. Cueva and E. Inga, “Information and communication technologies for education considering the flipped learning model,” Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 207, 2022, doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030207. (in English)
[23] K. Sumathi and K. Selvarani, “Relevance of ICT tools in teaching-learning exploiting flipped classroom, Journal of Critical Reviews, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 1048-1052, 2020. (in English)
[24] M. Ibrahim and R. Callaway, “Students’ learning outcomes and self-efficacy perception in a flipped classroom,” In T. Bastiaens (Ed.), Proceedings of e-learn: World conference on e-learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education, 2014, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 899–908. (in English)
[25] A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy. The exercise of control,” W.H. Freeman, 1997. (in English)
[26] L. M. Stadtlander, A. Sickel and D. Salter, “Online doctoral student research and writing self-efficacy in a publishing internship,” Higher Learning Research Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 78–89, 2020, doi.org/10.1177/2F1069072703257719. (in English)
[27] E. Oppermann, M. Brunner and Y. Anders, “The interplay between preschool teachers’ science self-efficacy beliefs, their teaching practices, and girls’ and boys’ early science motivation,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 70, pp. 86-99, 2019, doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.01.006. (in English)
[28] R. Livinƫi, G. Gunnesch-Luca and D. Iliescu, “Research self-efficacy: A meta-analysis,” Educational Psychologist, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 215-242, 2021, doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1886103. (in English)
[29] V. Crittenden, W. Crittenden and H. Ajjan, “Empowering women micro-entrepreneurs in emerging economies: The role of information communications technology,” Journal of Business Research. Vol. 98, pp. 191-203, 2019 doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.01.045. (in English)
[30] O. Hatlevik, “Examining the Relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence, strategies to evaluate information, and use of ICT at school,” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 555-567, 2017, doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172501. (in English)
[31] R. Hori and M. Fujii, “Impact of using ICT for Learning purposes on self-efficacy and persistence: evidence from Pisa 2018,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 6463, 2021, doi.org/10.3390/SU13116463. (in English)
[32] A. Sayaf, M. Alamri, M. Alqahtani and W. Al-Rahmi, “Information and communications technology used in higher education: An empirical study on digital learning as sustainability,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 7074, 2021, doi.org/10.3390/su13137074. (in English)
[33] I. Hatlevik and O. Hatlevik, “Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegial collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 9, p. 935, 2018, doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935. (in English)
[34] Z. Li, T. Zuo, X. Wei and N. Ding, “ICT self-efficacy scale: the correlations with the age of first access to the internet, the age at first ownership of a personal computer (PC), and a smartphone,” Medical Education Online, vol. 28, no.1, 2151068, 2023, doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2151068. (in English)
[35] C. Latorre-Cosculluela, et al., “Facilitating self-efficacy in university students: An interactive approach with flipped classroom,” Higher Education Research & Development, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1937067. (in English)
[36] D. González-Gómez, et al., “Performance and perception in the flipped learning model: An initial approach to evaluate the effectiveness of a new teaching methodology in a general science classroom,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 450–459, 2016, doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9. (in English)
[37] P. Schwarzenberg, J. Navon and M. Pérez-Sanagustín, “Models to provide guidance in flipped classes using online activity,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 282–306, 2020, doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09233-y. (in English)
[38] D. C. Kenna, “A study of the effect the flipped classroom model on student self-efficacy,” M. S. thesis, North Dakota State University, The USA, 2014. (in English)
[39] J. Fraenkel, N. Wallen and H. Hyun, “How to design and evaluate research in education,” 8th. ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2014. (in English)
[40] A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change,” Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977, doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191. (in English)
[41] I. T. Awidi and M. Paynter, “The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience,” Computers & Education, vol. 128, pp. 269-283, 2019, doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.013. (in English)
[42] Z. Zainuddin and C. J. Perera, “Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model,” Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115-126, 2019, doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916. (in English)
[43] C. K. Lo and K. F. Hew, “Using “first principles of instruction” to design secondary school mathematics flipped classroom: The findings of two exploratory studies,” Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 222-236, 2017. (in English)
[44] M. Jenkins, et al., “Enhancing the design and analysis of flipped learning strategies,” Teaching & Learning Inquiry, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2017, doi.org/10.20343/ teachlearninqu.5.1.7. (in English)
[45] I. C. V. Hsiao, S. T. A. Hung and H. T. D. Huang, “The flipped classroom approach in an English for specific purposes (ESP) course: A quasi-experimental study on learners’ self-efficacy, study process, and learning performances,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 55, no 3. pp. 507-526, 2023, doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1976329. (in English)
[46] F. Pajares and J. Barich, “Assessing mathematics self-efficacy: Are skills-specific measures better than domain- specific mesures?,” Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychological Society, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 334–348, 2020, doi.org/10.12681/psy_hps.23974. (in English)
[47] S. V. Paunonen and R. Y. Hong, “Self‐efficacy and the prediction of domain‐specific cognitive abilities,” Journal of personality, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 339-360, 2010. (in English)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Emin Tamer Yenen