Abstract
This study aims to explore the specific features and challenges of biology education, with a particular focus on the shortcomings of textbooks and teaching materials, as well as the role of digital technologies such as interactive simulations, virtual reality (VR), and augmented reality (AR) in the teaching and learning process. The research examines the development and impact of digital tools in biology instruction and investigates students’ and teachers’ attitudes toward integrating these technologies into classroom practice. A detailed analysis is provided of the distinctive characteristics of biology as a school subject and the challenges encountered in teaching it, highlighting textbook deficiencies that could be addressed through the use of widely accessible digital resources. The study presents concrete examples of how digital technologies can be applied in biology education, with special attention to virtual models, VR and AR applications, interactive simulations, and online platforms that can enhance both the effectiveness and engagement of the learning process. As part of the research, currently used biology textbooks and workbooks were reviewed. Findings indicate an urgent need for innovation, as some institutions still rely on textbooks over two decades old, illustrated with static black-and-white drawings, to teach members of the Z and Alpha generations-students who were born into the digital era and are now learning in the age of artificial intelligence. An empirical survey was conducted among students and teachers in primary and secondary schools within the Hungarian minority community in southern Slovakia, assessing opportunities, experiences, and openness toward the use of digital tools in biology classes. The results were positive, confirming that digitalization has a clear future in biology education, extending beyond the domain of computer science instruction. Based on these findings, the study proposes recommendations for modernizing the delivery of biology curricula through more up-to-date teaching materials.
References
[1] E. Jeronen, I. Palmberg, E. Yli-Panula. “Teaching Methods in Biology Education and Sustainability Education Including Outdoor Education for Promoting Sustainability—A Literature Review,” Education sciences 7(1), 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010001 (in English)
[2] M. Janela. “BSCS vs. Traditional Biology,” Iowa Science Teachers Journal 3(4), 1966. Available: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/istj/vol3/iss4/6 (in English)
[3] N. Scholar. Biology Education: Online vs. Traditional Classes. 2024. [Online], Available: https://disciplines.ng/biology-education-online-traditional-classes/ (in English)
[4] A. Fauzi, A. M. Rosyida, M. Rohma, D. Khoiroh. “The difficulty index of biology topics in Indonesian Senior High School: Biology undergraduate students’ perspectives,” JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia) 7(2), 149–158, 202. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.16538 (in English)
[5] D. Heldová, J. Kováčová, A. Galádová. Results of the OECD PISA 2009 study focusing on reading literacy. Bratislava, 2013. [Online], Available: https://www2.nucem.sk/dl/3479/PISA_web.pdf (in Slovak)
[6] K. Ušáková. “Reflection on the State and Perspectives of Didactics of Biology from the Perspective of the Faculty of Natural Sciences, CU in Bratislava,” Scientia in educatione 5, 74–89, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.130 (in Slovak)
[7] Z. Chyleńska, E. Rybska, S. Jaskulska, M. Błaszak, B. Jankowiak. “How about the Attitudes towards Nature? Analysis of the Nature and Biology Primary School Education Curricula in Poland,” Sustainability 14(18): 11173, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811173 (in English)
[8] I. Franyó. “The status of biology as a subject and its development tasks” Új Pedagógiai Szemle 52(5), 24-37, 2002. Available: https://epa.oszk.hu/00000/00035/00060/2002-05-hk-Franyo-Biologia.html (in Hungarian)
[9] A. R. Althubyani. “Digital Competence of Teachers and the Factors Affecting Their Competence Level: A Nationwide Mixed-Methods Study,” Sustainability 16(7): 2796, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072796 (in English)
[10] D. Warlick. Curriculum is Dead. 2006. [Online], Available: http://2cents.onlearning.us/?p=420 (in English)
[11] N. Annuš. “Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence,” TEM Journal 13(1), 404-413, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM131-42 (in English)
[12] V. Stoffová, K. Czakóová, “ Current issues in teacher training, digital transformation of teacher training,” InfoDidac, 215-222, 2020. Available: http://konferenciak.inf.elte.hu/infodidact/InfoDidact20/Manuscripts/SVCzK.pdf (in Hungarian)
[13] P. Ficzere. “The emergence and role of digitization in education,” Gradus 11(1), 2024. https://doi.org/10.47833/2024.1.ART.003 (in Hungarian)
[14] P. Kleininger. New methods in biological knowledge acquisition. Séchenyi 2020. [Online], Available: https://tovabbkepzes.itk.ppke.hu/content/Biologia/2019/Uj_modszerek_Kleininger_T.pdf (in Hungarian)
[15] T. Ijiri, H. Todo, A. Hirabayashi, K. Kohiyama, Y. Dobashi. “Digitization of natural objects with micro CT and photographs,” PLoS ONE 13(4), 2018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195852 (in English)
[16] M. Nagy, D. Dancsa, J. Poráčová, R. Bernátová. “Real and virtual interactive models in biology education,” Eruditio – Educatio 16(4), 5–18 , 2021. https://doi.org/10.36007/eruedu.2021.4.5-17 (in Hungarian)
[17] M. Teplá, P. Teplý, P. Šmejkal. “Influence of 3D models and animations on students in natural subjects,” International Journal of STEM Education 9(65), 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00382-8 (in English)
[18] T. F. Chuang, Y. H. Chou, J. Y. Pai, C. N. Huang, H. Bair, A. Pai, N. C. Yu. “Using Virtual Reality Technology in Biology Education: Satisfaction & Learning Outcomes of High School Students,” The American Biology Teacher 85(1), 23–32, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2023.85.1.23 (in English)
[19] N. Annuš, D. Paksi, M. Csóka. “Interactivity and Animation-Simulation Tools in the Digital Presentation of Educational Material,” 17th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. IATED, Spain, 2023. 6975-6980. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2023.1895 (in English)
[20] W. R. Sharif, L. Narain, A. A. Ogowewo. “Impact of virtual reality and augmented reality technologies on biology education: A review,” GSC Advanced Research and Reviews 22(3), 159–167, 2025. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2025.22.3.0078 (in English)
[21] E. Lee, K. W. Wong, C. C. Fung. “How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach,” Computers & Education 55(4), 1424–1442, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006 (in English)
[22] İ. Ü. Yapici, F. Karakoyun. “Using Augmented Reality in Biology Teaching,” Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology 9(3), 40–51, 2021. https://doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2021.9.3.286 (in English)
[23] R. Kandikó, Á. Németh, O. Novodomszki, T. Somoskői. “Online dangers and addiction: in Tabuk nélkül, D. Boros, L. Czvik, E. Dorogi, Z. Hajdu, R. Kandikó, N. Káló, Á. Németh, N. Németh-Kovács, O. Novodomszki, K. Petrovics, Á. Ráczné Ördögh, T. Somoskői, K. Ötvös-Varga, A. Varga, G. Vidák, Eds. Szakmai-módszertani gyűjtemény tanároknak. Oktatási Hivatal, 236, 2020. ISBN 978-615-6256-66-9. (in Hungarian)
[24] M. Yilmaz, M. Coskun Simsek. “The Use of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and the Metaverse in Education: The Views of Preservice Biology and Mathematics Teachers,” MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices 13(1), 64–80, 2023. https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2023/v13/i1/2422 (in English)
[25] K. Simon. “WordWall. How to quickly create interactive materials for online and traditional environments,” Modern Nyelvoktatás 26(4), 93–98, 2021. Available: https://ojs.elte.hu/modernnyelvok/article/view/2392 (in Hungarian)
[26] A. Rahman, H. A. Rony, A. Shihavuddin, M. H. Sikder, M. G. Fakir. “Kahoot: A Game-Based Learning Tool in Online Class for Effective Engagement and Formative Assessment,” Green Uni-versity Review of Social Sciences 2(9), 2023. https://doi.org/10.5296/ire.v9i2.18413 (in English)
[27] M. Gonzalez-Guzman, C. de Ollas, R. Perez-Clemente, A. Gomez-Cadenas, V. Arbona. “Kahoot application as a tool to track student assimilation of biology practical competences within the degree of medicine,” 11th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 2019. 8778-8782. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2185 (in English)
[28] A. Stepanyuk, T. Olendr, I. Tsydilo, L. Mironets, M. Kormer. “Integrated Use of the LearningApps.org Resource and Information Devices in the Process of Biology School Course Studying,” Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology – Volume 2: AET, 2020, 452–465. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010932800003364 (in English)
[29] iCEV. Pros & Cons of Using Quizlet in Your Classroom. 2019. [Online], Available: https://www.icevonline.com/blog/quizlet-pros-cons (in English)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Fanny Litavczová, Norbert Annuš

