MIND MAPPING AND REAL-TIME COMMENTING TO SUPPORT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATED LEARNING  IN VIDEO CREATION
PDF

Keywords

student-created videos
mind mapping
real-time commenting
multimodal learning
self-regulated learning

How to Cite

[1]
X. Fang, L. Zhang, Q. Xia, X. Weng, and T. K. Chiu, “MIND MAPPING AND REAL-TIME COMMENTING TO SUPPORT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ SELF-REGULATED LEARNING  IN VIDEO CREATION”, ITLT, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 157–175, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v113i3.6401.

Abstract

Video creation offers students opportunities for active and authentic learning while enabling them to acquire knowledge and 21st-century skills across various disciplines. In the AI-driven era of higher education, video creation could become one of the most effective pedagogical approaches. Self-regulated learning (SRL) is a key higher-order skill for 21st-century learners, that enables them to adapt as lifelong learners in dynamic environments. Students’ video creation is an active learning activity that requires SRL, as students need to manage the processes of goal setting, planning, and managing their projects. However, these SRL processes do not occur naturally or easily. Therefore, we need to intentionally design learning environments and teaching practices to enhance students’ SRL. Two potential scaffolding approaches that can support students’ SRL in the video creation learning process are mind mapping and real-time commenting. This study investigated the effects of these two approaches on seven key aspects of SRL in video creation activities: goal setting, planning, self-monitoring, evaluation, reflection, self-efficacy, and effort. We carried out an eight-week intervention study involving 140 Chinese university students and employed a 2 × 2 between-subjects factorial design with four intervention groups. Our analysis revealed that: (i) mind mapping significantly enhanced five aspects of students’ SRL: goal setting, planning, self-monitoring, reflection, and self-efficacy; (ii) real-time commenting significantly improved two aspects of students’ SRL: evaluation and reflection; and (iii) neither mind mapping nor real-time commenting significantly enhanced students’ effort. The results highlight the effectiveness of mind mapping and real-time commenting in supporting different phases of students’ SRL in video-based learning, with practical implications that include the potential use of generative AI tools in multimedia learning contexts to enrich instructional practices.

PDF

References

[1] M. Sarfraz, D. Rajendran, C. Hewege, and M. D. Mohan, “An exploration of global employability skills: A systematic research review,” International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–88, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwoe.2018.091339. (in English).

[2] C. Snelson, “Video production in content-area pedagogy: A scoping study of the research literature,” Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 294–306, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1504788. (in English).

[3] X. Fang and T. K. F. Chiu, “Enhancing business education through video: A conceptual model and research directions based on a systematic review,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 100959, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100959. (in English).

[4] P. L. Schultz and A. S. Quinn, “Lights, camera, action! Learning about management with student-produced video assignments,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 234–258, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913488371.(in English).

[5] L. O. Campbell, S. H. Heller, and L. Pulse, “Student-created video: An active learning approach in online environments,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1145–1154, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1711777. (in English).

[6] B. J. Zimmerman, “Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview,” Theory Into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 64–70, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2. (in English).

[7] J.-W. Fang, L.-Y. He, G.-J. Hwang, X.-W. Zhu, C.-N. Bian, and Q.-K. Fu, “A concept mapping-based self-regulated learning approach to promoting students’ learning achievement and self-regulation in STEM activities,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 7159–7181, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2061013. (in English).

[8] H. Gong and D. Yan, “The impact of Danmaku-based and synchronous peer feedback on L2 oral performance: A mixed-method investigation,” PLOS ONE, vol. 18, no. 4, p. e0284843, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284843.(in English).

[9] R. Hawley and C. Allen, “Student-generated video creation for assessment: Can it transform assessment within higher education?,” International Journal for Transformative Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijtr-2018-0001. (in English).

[10] Q. Liu, S. Geertshuis, T. Gladman, and R. Grainger, “Student video production within health professions education: A scoping review,” Medical Education Online, vol. 27, no. 1, p. 2040349, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2040349. (in English).

[11] A. Devolder, J. Van Braak, and J. Tondeur, “Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: Systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 557–573, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00476.x.(in English).

[12] N. Edisherashvili, K. Saks, M. Pedaste, and Ä. Leijen, “Supporting self-regulated learning in distance learning contexts at higher education level: Systematic literature review,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 12, p. 792422, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.792422. (in English).

[13] L. A. Schindler, G. J. Burkholder, O. A. Morad, and C. Marsh, “Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature,” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 25, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0. (in English).

[14] Z. Pi, M. Tang, and J. Yang, “Seeing others’ messages on the screen during video lectures hinders transfer of learning,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1809–1822, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1749671. (in English).

[15] P. Arsenis, M. Flores, and D. Petropoulou, “Enhancing graduate employability skills and student engagement through group video assessment,” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 245–258, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1897086. (in English).

[16] T. K. F. Chiu, “Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 124, p. 106909, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909. (in English).

[17] B. Wraae, C. Tigerstedt, and A. Walmsley, “Using reflective videos to enhance entrepreneurial learning,” Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 740–761, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127420936955. (in English).

[18] M. T. Stratton and M. Julien, “Xtranormal learning for millennials: An innovative tool for group projects,” Journal of Management Education, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 259–281, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913504923. (in English).

[19] J. Z. Lam and M. M. Yunus, “Student-produced video for learning: A systematic review,” Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 386–395, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1402.14. (in English).

[20] S. Vanslambrouck, C. Zhu, B. Pynoo, K. Lombaerts, J. Tondeur, and R. Scherer, “A latent profile analysis of adult students’ online self-regulation in blended learning environments,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 99, pp. 126–136, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.021. (in English).

[21] K. Beckman, T. Apps, S. Bennett, B. Dalgarno, G. Kennedy, and L. Lockyer, “Self-regulation in open-ended online assignment tasks: The importance of initial task interpretation and goal setting,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 821–835, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1654450. (in English).

[22] D. Schwam, D. Greenberg, and H. Li, “Individual differences in self-regulated learning of college students enrolled in online college courses,” American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 133–151, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1829255. (in English).

[23] E. Alvi, Z. Iqbal, F. Masood, and T. Batool, “A qualitative account of the nature and use of self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies employed by university students,” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 40–59, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n8.3. (in English).

[24] B. J. Zimmerman, “Attaining self-regulation: A social-cognitive perspective,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, Eds. Orlando, FL: Academic, 2000, pp. 13–39 (in English).

[25] Q.-K. Fu, C.-J. Lin, G.-J. Hwang, and L. Zhang, “Impacts of a mind mapping-based contextual gaming approach on EFL students’ writing performance, learning perceptions and generative uses in an English course,” Computers & Education, vol. 137, pp. 59–77, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.005. (in English).

[26] E. Merchie and H. Van Keer, “Mind mapping as a meta-learning strategy: Stimulating pre-adolescents’ text-learning strategies and performance?,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 46, pp. 128–147, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.005. (in English).

[27] Z. Liu, X. Kong, S. Liu, and Z. Yang, “Effects of computer-based mind mapping on students’ reflection, cognitive presence, and learning outcomes in an online course,” Distance Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 544–562, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2226615. (in English).

[28] X. Lin, Q. Sun, and X. Zhang, “Increasing student online interactions: Applying the video timeline-anchored comment (VTC) tool to asynchronous online video discussions,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2247554. (in English).

[29] M. Zhang, Q. Jiang, W. Xiong, Q. Li, and W. Zhao, “Effects of real-time danmaku interaction on student engagement in live video-streaming teaching: Analyzing the mediating roles of social, teaching, and cognitive presences,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 2023–2043, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2388766. (in English).

[30] L. Barnard, V. Paton, and W. Lan, “Online self-regulatory learning behaviors as a mediator in the relationship between online course perceptions with achievement,” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.516. (in English).

[31] T. Toering, M. T. Elferink-Gemser, L. Jonker, M. J. G. Van Heuvelen, and C. Visscher, “Measuring self-regulation in a learning context: Reliability and validity of the self-regulation of learning self-report scale (SRL-SRS),” International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 24–38, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2012.645132. (in English).

[32] C. Gündüzalp, “Using the mind mapping method in web-based teaching: Pre-service teachers' metacognitive learning strategies and self-directed learning skills,” Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 218–241, 2023 (in English).

[33] X. Zheng, T. E. Johnson, and C. Zhou, “A pilot study examining the impact of collaborative mind mapping strategy in a flipped classroom: Learning achievement, self-efficacy, motivation, and students’ acceptance,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 3527–3545, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09868-0. (in English).

[34] T. K. F. Chiu, M. S. Jong, and I. A. C. Mok, “Does learner expertise matter when designing emotional multimedia for learners of primary school mathematics?,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 2305–2320, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09775-4. (in English).

[35] B. Huang, M. S.-Y. Jong, R. B. King, C.-S. Chai, and M. Y.-C. Jiang, “Promoting secondary students’ twenty-first century skills and STEM career interests through a crossover program of STEM and community service education,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 13, pp. 903252–903252, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.903252. (in English).

[36] R. Clayton Bernard and G. Kermarrec, “Peer assessment and video feedback for fostering self, co, and shared regulation of learning in a higher education language classroom,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, p. 732094, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.732094. (in English).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Xueqing Fang, Ling Zhang, Qi Xia, Xiaojing Weng, Thomas K.F. Chiu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.