Keywords
corpus manager
descriptive codes
discourse analysis
thematic analysis
How to Cite
Abstract
The integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in linguistics research has revolutionized the study of values embedded within language. This article centres on the application of the AntConc corpus manager as the primary ICT instrument for analysing values in discourse, illustrating its methodological contribution to value-oriented linguistic research. It examines how digital corpora, computational linguistics, and data visualization techniques contribute to identifying and interpreting values in various contexts. The study employs discourse analysis and thematic analysis as primary methodologies for exploring values, providing a nuanced understanding of how individuals express and embody their values in everyday interactions. Discourse analysis serves as a foundational tool for uncovering values embedded in language and communication patterns. By analyzing the structure and context of discourse, explicit expressions of values can be identified. Thematic analysis, on the other hand, allows for a more in-depth exploration of underlying themes and patterns in discourse, revealing implicit values that may be subtly conveyed through language use. Furthermore, the article discusses the process of coding both explicit and implicit values in discourse. Coding explicit values (codes in vivo) involves identifying and categorizing overt expressions of values. Сoding implicit values requires a more nuanced approach, focusing on underlying meanings and providing descriptive codes that are generated inductively from the data. The research highlights the importance of the AntConc corpus manager in handling large datasets, enabling researchers to uncover value-laden patterns in discourse. By showcasing specific case studies and practical applications, the article demonstrates the transformative impact of ICT on the field of linguistics, particularly in the context of value research in discourse studies. The interdisciplinary findings underscore the potential of ICT, with corpus managers playing a central role, to deepen understanding of how values are constructed, communicated, and perceived across diverse linguistic environments.
References
[1] J. H. Martin and D. Jurafsky, “Speech and Language Processing” (3d ed.). Prentice Hall, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/ed3book_aug25.pdf. (in English)
[2] S. Hinrich, “Foundations of statistical natural language processing.” Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.pl/books?id=YiFDxbEX3SUC&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false. (in English)
[3] S. Lappin, A. Clark and C. Fox, “Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing.” John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/14228/1/28%20pdf.pdf. (in English)
[4] T.A. van Dijk, “Critical Discourse Analysis”, in Discourse and Power. London: Macmillan Educ. UK, 2008, pp. 85-101, doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3_4. (in English)
[5] N. Fairclough, “Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language.” Routledge, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.pl/books?id=nf7cAAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false. (in English)
[6] M. Davies, “The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English,” Literary Linguistic Comput., 25, № 4, pp. 447–464, October, 2010, doi: 10.1093/llc/fqq018. (in English)
[7] M. Davies, “Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million word Corpus of Historical American English,” Corpora, 7, № 2, pp. 121–157, Nov., 2012, doi: 10.3366/cor.2012.0024. (in English)
[8] J. Butler, “Gender Trouble.” New York, London: Routledge, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://selforganizedseminar.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/butler-gender_trouble.pdf. (in English)
[9] S. Pawar et. al., “Survey of Cultural Awareness in Language Models: Text and Beyond”. Computational Linguistics, pp. 1–96, 2025, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.00860. (in English)
[10] N. Shkvorchenko, “Semiotization of political toxicity in the media spaces of the USA, Great Britain and Ukraine: a multimodal aspect”. Mess. of Kyiv nat. ling. univ. Ser. Philol. 2022, 25(1), pp. 142–151, doi: 10.32589/2311-0821.1.2022.26313. (in English)
[11] C. O’Neil, “Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy.” Penguin, 2017, doi: 10.5860/crl.78.3.403. (in English)
[12] D. Matheson, “Discourse analysis after the computational turn: a mixed bag”. Communication Research and Practice. 2023, 9(1), pp. 3–15, doi: 10.1080/22041451.2023.2190531. (in English)
[13] B. Kivle and G. Espedal, “Identifying values through discourse analysis” in Researching values: methodological approaches for understanding values work in organisations and leadership, G. Espedal, B. J. Løvaas, S. Sirris, A. Wæraas, Eds., Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, pp. 171–189, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-90769-3_1. (in English)
[14] L. Sheperd, “Gender, Violence and Security.” London, New York: Zed Books, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://librarysearch.kcl.ac.uk/discovery/fulldisplay?context=L&vid=44KCL_INST:44KCL_INST&docid=alma990015557240206881. (in English)
[15] K. J. Gergen and T. J. Tatchenkery, “Organization science as social construction: Postmodern potentials,” J. of Appl. Behav. Sc., 32(4), pp. 356-377, 1996, doi: 10.1177/0021886396324002. (in English)
[16] L. Wittgenstein, “Philosophical investigations.” John Wiley & Sons, 2009. (in English)
[17] P. Selznick, “The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community.” University of California Press, 1992. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.pl/books?id=cRpmAL3Ni44C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false. (in English)
[18] W. Bilsky, M. Janik and S. H. Schwartz, “The structural organization of human values-evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS)”. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2010, 42(5), pp. 759–776, doi: 10.1177/0022022110362757. (in English)
[19] M. Winther Jørgensen and L. Phillips, “Discourse analysis as theory and method.” Sage, 2002, doi: 10.4135/9781849208871. (in English)
[20] E. Aadland, “Values in professional practice: Towards a critical reflective methodology”. J. of Bus. Ethics, 97(3), pp. 461–472, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40929465. (in English)
[21] J. Potter and M. Wetherell, “Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour.” London: Sage, 1987. (in English)
[22] A. Wæraas, “Thematic analysis: making values emerge from texts” in Researching values: methodological approaches for understanding values work in organisations and leadership, G. Espedal, B. J. Løvaas, S. Sirris, A. Wæraas, Eds., Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, pp. 153–170, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-90769-3_1. (in English)
[23] M. Schreier, “Qualitative content analysis in practice.” Sage, 2012, doi: 10.4135/9781529682571. (in English)
[24] B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, “The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.” Aldine de Gruyter, 1999, doi: 10.4324/9780203793206. (in English)
[25] C. Esin, M. Fathi and C. Squire, “Narrative analysis: The constructionist approach”, in The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, U. Flick, Ed., Sage, 2014, pp. 203–216, doi: 10.4135/9781446282243.n14. (in English)
[26] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualit. Res. in Psych., 3(2), pp. 77–101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. (in English)
[27] D. A. Gioia, K. G. Corley and A. L. Hamilton, “Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology”. Organizat. Res. Meth., 16(1), pp. 15–31, 2012, doi: 10.1177/1094428112452151. (in English)
[28] A. Strauss and J. Corbin, “Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.” Sage, 1998. [Online]. Available: https://research-proposal.ir/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Basics_of_Qualitative_Research__Techniques_and_Procedures_for_Developing_Grounded_Theory.pdf. (in English)
[29] L. Anthony. AntConc Version 4.2.4. (2023). [Online]. Available: https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software. (in English)
[30] J. Saldaña, “The coding manual for qualitative researchers.” Sage, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.pl/books?id=ZhxiCgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false. (in English)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Yuliia Skrynnik