Abstract
The advancement of smartphone technology has reaped several benefits in many sectors. In education, teachers have yet to fully adopt in their classrooms, which calls for their preparedness. This mixed-methods study has examined the knowledge, skills, attitudes, and classroom practices of 58 randomly selected in-service science teachers from public high schools in the Eastern Visayas region of the Philippines regarding smartphone-based physics experiments. Using validated and reliable instruments, this paper uncovered a disconnect between teachers’ positive attitude towards smartphone implementation and their practical and theoretical knowledge and skills. Most teachers have a low conceptual understanding (f = 23) of smartphone-based experimentation and struggle to apply skills in data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Even more profound was the lack of practical skills among surveyed teachers. The average teacher score was only 1.30 out of 15, placing them at an absent skill level. During the classroom observations, these findings were confirmed: the use of smartphones in science classes was rarely or never observed. Qualitative insights indicated that teachers were genuinely perplexed by fundamental concepts such as repeated data collection, unit representation, and graphing. These results imply that presumptions about teachers' baseline preparedness cannot be used to design effective continuing professional development programs. Rather, CPD must start with the basics, employing scaffolding techniques that develop competence and confidence from the ground up. Even the most passionate educators will find it difficult to turn their idealistic perspectives of technology into worthwhile educational opportunities for their pupils if these fundamental gaps are not filled. This needs assessment provides the evidence base for creating focused, useful professional development that meets teachers where they are.
References
[1] A. Stefanel, “Graph in physics education: From representation to conceptual understanding,” in Mathematics in Physics Education, A. Stefanel, Ed., Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 195–231, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04627-9_9. (in English)
[2] M. Vignal, G. Geschwind, B. Pollard, R. Henderson, M. D. Caballero, and H. J. Lewandowski, “Survey of physics reasoning on uncertainty concepts in experiments: An assessment of measurement uncertainty for introductory physics labs,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 19, no. 2, Art. no. 020139, 2023, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020139. (in English)
[3] M. Park and J. B. Son, “Pre-service EFL teachers’ readiness in computer-assisted language learning and teaching,” Asia Pacific Journal of Education, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 320–334, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02188791.2020.1815649. (in English)
[4] N. V. Petar, “The role of CPD programs in supporting teachers’ application of innovative teaching methods,” Research and Advances in Education, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 47–51, 2024, doi: 10.56397/RAE.2024.09.04. (in English)
[5] N. A. Dahri, M. S. Vighio, J. D. Bather, and A. A. Arain, “Factors influencing the acceptance of mobile collaborative learning for the continuous professional development of teachers,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 23, Art. no. 13222, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su132313222. (in English)
[6] J. H. Kim and H. Park, “Effects of smartphone-based mobile learning in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Asian Nursing Research, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2019.01.005. (in English)
[7] F. A. Pacala, “Improving students’ conceptual understanding of magnetic fields and science process skills through guided exploratory experiments using a smartphone,” in Proc. International Scientific-Practical Conference “Information Technology for Education, Science and Technics”, Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 283–296, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-71804-5_19. (in English)
[8] J. L. Bowman, “Examining the relationship between mobile phone utilization on self-directed online professional development among early childhood practitioners: A preregistered study,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA, 2024. (in English)
[9] L. M. Bald, “Moving from theory to practice: Integrating mobile devices in elementary reading instruction,” Ph.D. dissertation, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2016. (in English)
[10] C. O’Toole, “The lived experiences of ICT and engineering teaching faculty in higher education institutions in Ireland and the United Kingdom, who adopt and implement mobile technology-enhanced learning initiatives: A phenomenological investigation,” Ph.D. dissertation, Lancaster University, Lancaster, U.K., 2018. (in English)
[11] K. Moodley, “Mobile learning: A professional teacher technical identity development framework,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa, 2017. (in English)
[12] H. I. Ivaniuk, L. V. Kuzemko, and I. M. Novyk, “Training program ‘Designing a multimedia environment of general secondary education and preschool education institutions’ as an instrument for future educators’ digital skills formation,” Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 73–89, 2020, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v79i5.3901. (in English)
[13] K. Kotuľáková, “Identifying teachers’ beliefs prior to CPD training focusing on an inquiry-based approach in science education,” Research in Science Education, vol. 51, suppl. 1, pp. 183–211, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-9841-0. (in English)
[14] M. Shrestha, “Inspirational leadership among teachers: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods study in the school setting of Nepal,” Journal of Education and Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 87–113, 2022, doi: 10.51474/jer.v12i1.595. (in English)
[15] F. A. A. Pacala, “Developing and validating an integrated three-tier multiple choice test for smartphone-based experiments in physics,” in DigiTransfEd 2024: 3rd Workshop on Digital Transformation of Education, co-located with the 19th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research, and Industrial Applications (ICTERI 2024), Lviv, Ukraine, Sept. 23–27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3771/paper01.pd (in English)
[16] V. Pleskach, F. A. Pacala, M. J. Cinco, R. Mendaño, and E. Echapare, “Development and validation of an instrument assessing physics teachers' beliefs, competence, and attitudes in smartphone-based physics experiments,” in Proc. Information Technology and Implementation (IT&I-2024), Kyiv, Ukraine, Nov. 20–21, 2024. (in English)
[17] D. F. Polit, C. T. Beck, and S. V. Owen, “Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations,” Research in Nursing & Health, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 459–467, 2007, doi: 10.1002/nur.20199. (in English)
[18] K. Alexandros, L. Panagiotis, T. Serafeim, T. Pavlos, and V. Athanasios, “Possible technical problems encountered by the teacher in the incorporation of mobile phone sensors in the physics lab,” European Journal of Physics Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 5–23, 2020, doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.12129444.v1. (in English)
[19] T. J. Kennedy and C. W. Sundberg, “21st century skills,” in Science Education in Theory and Practice, B. Akpan and T. J. Kennedy, Eds., Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_32. (in English)
[20] H. V. Le and L. Q. Nguyen, “Promoting L2 learners’ critical thinking skills: the role of social constructivism in reading class,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 9, Art. no. 1241973, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1241973. (in English)
[21] M. Mathieu, The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies – Executive Summary, Directorate for Education and Skills, Paris, France, 2005. (in English)
[22] S. A. Nikou, “Mobile learning teacher competencies framework,” in Proc. EDULEARN 2020: 12th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/72195/1/NIkou_Edulearn_2020_mobile_learning_teacher_competencies.pdf (in English)
[23] P. A. Ertmer and A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, “Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect,” Journal of Research on Technology in Education, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 255–284, 2010, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551. (in English)
[24] J. Tondeur, J. Van Braak, P. A. Ertmer, and A. T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, “Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 555–575, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2. (in English)
[25] D. E. Cunningham, A. Alexander, S. Luty, and L. Zlotos, “CPD preferences and activities of general practitioners, registered pharmacy staff and general practice nurses in NHS Scotland—a questionnaire survey,” Education for Primary Care, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 220–229, 2019, doi: 10.1080/14739879.2019.1617644. (in English)
[26] M. Campos-Zamora, H. Gilbert, R. I. Esparza-Perez, M. Sanchez-Mendiola, R. Gardner, J. B. Richards, et al., “Continuing professional development challenges in a rural setting: A mixed-methods study,” Perspectives on Medical Education, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 273–280, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40037-022-00718-8. (in English)
[27] P. Lazos, A. Kateris, S. Tsoukos, P. Tzamalis, and A. Velentzas, “Physics experiments at home: A case study in the era of COVID-19 quarantine,” in Part 4/Strand 4 Digital Resources for Science Teaching and Learning, p. 256, 2020. (in English)
[28] F. Fadilla, J. M. Hsb, N. A. Putri, S. Ahwani, M. H. R. Nasution, and S. Ismahani, “Teaching syntax in the digital age: Tools and techniques for educators,” International Journal of Online and Emerging Education, vol. 6, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.33650/ijoeel.v6i2.9709. (in English)
[29] T. K. Chiu and D. Churchill, “Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: Changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 317–327, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1113709. (in English)
[30] E. L. Uy, F. B. Patosa, R. S. Dacuma, and M. J. S. Santiago, “Pathway to a proficient teacher,” ETCOR, vol. IV, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.63498/etcor390. (in English)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Frank Angelo Pacala, Monell John Cañizares, Rezy Mendaño

