PREVENTION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE OVERLOAD IN THE COURSE OF LEARNING WITH THE USE OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCES

Authors

  • Tetiana M. Derkach National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v29i3.677

Keywords:

information technologies, electron resources, cognitive load

Abstract

Literature data that describe some possibilities for prevention of students’ cognitive overload during learning with the use of electronic resources have been generalized in the paper. On this basis, general principles to be used for the design and further utilization of dynamic visualization have been formulated. Some techniques allowing the adjustment of students’ cognitive load have been described. The described principles can be used as a guiding line for the development and efficiency control of teaching techniques. If teachers obey the above principles then they will be able to use opportunities of information technologies knowingly and effectively and to adapt electronic resources for various student groups taking into account pedagogical, physiological and psychological factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tetiana M. Derkach, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv

PhD (chemical sciences), doctoral student at the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology of Higher School

References

Антоненко І. Електронні ресурси як об'єкт каталогізації: історія питання, термінологія, форматне забезпечення / І. Антоненко, О. Баркова // Бібл. вісн. – 2004. – № 2. – С. 11–22.

Жалдак М. І. Використання комп’ютера в навчальному процесі має бути педагогічно виваженим і доцільним / М. І. Жалдак // Комп’ютер у школі та сім’ї. – 2011. – № 3. – С. 3–12.

Деркач Т. М. Інформатизація викладання хімії: від теорії до практики : моногр./ Т. М. Деркач. – Д. : Вид-во ДНУ, 2011. – 225 с.

Baddeley A. Working memory and the vividness of imagery / A. Baddeley, J. Andrade // Journal of Experimental Psychology : General. 2000. – V. 129. – P. 126–145.

Sweller J. Evolution of human cognitive architecture / J. Sweller // The psychology of learning and motivation. − 2003. − Vol. 43. − P. 215–266.

Деркач Т. М. Вимірювання когнітивного навантаження для дослідження ефективності засобів інформаційних технологій / Т. М. Деркач // Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання. – 2011. – Т. 22. – № 2 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу до ресурсу : http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/issue/view/41. – Заг. з екрана. – Мова укр.

Smith M. E. Factors in the measurement of cognitive load of multimedia learning / submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree // Magister Educationis in Computer-Integrated Education. University of Pretoria, 2007. – 108 р.

Roberts W. E. The Use of Cues in Multimedia Instructions in technology as a way to reduce Cognitive load / A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education Technology Education. – Raleigh, NC. – 2009. – 124 р.

Деркач Т. М. Основні принципи ефективного навчання із застосуванням мультимедійних засобів / Т. М. Деркач // Зб. матер. Всеукраїнської науково-практичної конференції «Креативна освіта як умова розвитку творчої особистості». – Дніпропетровськ : Інновація, 2012 (прийнято до друку).

Деркач Т. М. Підготовка студентів хімічного факультету до використання інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій у майбутній педагогічній діяльності // Т. М. Деркач, Н. В. Стець // Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології. – Сум : СумДПУ ім. А. О. Макаренка. – 2011. – № 6–7 (16–17). – С. 186–194.

Björn B. de Koning. Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design / Björn B. de Koning & Huib K. Tabbers & Remy M. J. P. Rikers & Fred Paas // Educ. Psychol. Rev. – 2010. – Vol. 21 – Р. 113–140.

Plass J. L. Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations / J. L. Plass, B. D. Homer, E. O. Hayward // J. Comput. High. Educ. – 2009. – Vol. 21. – Р. 31–61.

Scheiter K. Cognitive and socio-motivational aspects in learning with animations: there is more to it than ‘do they aid learning or not’ / K. Scheiter, P. Gerjets // Instr. Sci. – 2010. – Vol. 38. – Р. 435–440.

Pastore R. S. The effects of diagrams and time-compressed instruction on learning and learners’ perceptions of cognitive load / R. S. Pastore // Education Tech. Research Dev. – 2010. – Vol. 58. – Р. 485–505.

Moreno R. Decreasing Cognitive Load for Novice Students: Effects of Explanatory versus Corrective Feedback in Discovery-Based Multimedia Educational Psychology Program / R. Moreno // Instructional Science. – 2004. – Vol. 32. – Р. 99–113.

Rikers R. M. J. P. Cognitive Load Theory as a Tool for Expertise Development / R. M. J. P. Rikers, Van Gerven P. W. M., Schmidt H. G. // Instructional Science. – 2004. – Vol. 32. – Р. 173–182.

Blayney P. Interactions between the isolated–interactive elements effect and levels of learner expertise: experimental evidence from an accountancy class / P. Blayney, S. Kalyuga, J. Sweller // Instr. Sci. – 2010. – Vol. 38. – Р. 277–287.

Rughooputh D. V. Integrating text-to-speech software into pedagogically sound teaching and learning scenarios / D. V. Rughooputh, M. I. Santally // Education Tech. Research Dev. – 2009. – Vol. 57. – Р. 131–145.

Linek S. B. The speaker/gender effect: does the speaker’s gender matter when presenting auditory text in multimedia messages? / S. B. Linek, P. Gerjets, K. Scheiter // Instr. Sci. – 2010. – Vol. 38. – Р. 503–521.

Ayres P. Interdisciplinary Perspectives Inspiring a New Generation of Cognitive Load Research / P. Ayres, P. Fred // Educ. Psychol. Rev. – 2009. – Vol. 21. – Р. 1–9.

Van Gog T. The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations / T. van Gog, F. Paas, N. Marcus, P. Ayres, J. Sweller // Educ. Psychol. Rev. – 2009. – Vol. 21. – Р. 21–30.

Schnotz W. External and internal representations in multimedia learning / W. Schnotz, R. K. Lowe (Eds.) // Learning and Instruction. – 2003. – Vol. 13. – № 2. – Р. 141–156.

Van Merriënboer J. J. G. Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions / J. J. G. Van Merriënboer, J. Sweller // Educational Psychology Review. – 2005. – Vol. 17. – Р. 147–177.

Van Gerven P. W. M. Cognitive Aging and Computer-Based Instructional Design: Where DoWe Go From Here? / P. W. M. Van Gerven, F. Paas, H. K. Tabbers // Educ. Psychol. Rev. – 2006. – Vol. 18. – Р. 141–157.

Lin H. The effect of static and animated visualization: a perspective of instructional effectiveness and efficiency / H. Lin, F. M. Dwyer // Education Tech. Research Dev. – 2010. – Vol. 58. – Р. 155–174.

Kollöffel B. Exploring the relation between visualizer-verbalizer cognitive styles and performance with visual or verbal learning material / B. Kollöffel // Computers & Education. – 2012. – Vol. 58. – Р. 697–706.

Косоногов В. Зеркальные нейроны: краткий научный обзор / В. Косоногов. – Ростов-на-Дону, 2009. – 24 с. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу до ресурсу : http://lit.lib.ru/k/kosonogow_w_w/kosonogow-zerkalxnyenejrony-kratkijnauchnyjobzordoc.shtml. – Заг. з екрана. – Мова рос.

Деркач Т. Особливості кольоросприйняття в навчанні хімії / Т. Деркач, Є. Язикова // Біологія і хімія в школі. – 2011. – № 2. – С. 36–38.

Moreno R. Active Multimodal Learning Environments Special Issue on Interactive Learning Environments: Contemporary Issues and Trends / R. Moreno, R. Mayer // Educ. Psychol. Rev. – 2007. – Vol. 19. – P. 309–326.

Downloads

Published

2012-06-28

How to Cite

[1]
T. M. Derkach, “PREVENTION OF STUDENTS’ COGNITIVE OVERLOAD IN THE COURSE OF LEARNING WITH THE USE OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCES”, ITLT, vol. 29, no. 3, Jun. 2012.

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 3 (2012)

Section

Learning tools in modern pedagogical systems

License

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
  2. The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.

Content Licensing

  1. Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.

Deposit Policy

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
  4. Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.