WEBOMETRICS RANKING OF UNIVERSITIES AS A FACTOR OF GAINING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN THE MARKET FOR EDUCATIONAL SERVICES
PDF

Keywords

educational establishment
university image
webometrics ranking
website
competitive advantage
marketing campaign
target audience

How to Cite

[1]
V. O. Umanets, L. S. . Shevchenko, and A. I. Bezugly, “WEBOMETRICS RANKING OF UNIVERSITIES AS A FACTOR OF GAINING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN THE MARKET FOR EDUCATIONAL SERVICES”, ITLT, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 324–336, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v77i3.3261.

Abstract

Being a “window on the world”, the official website of an educational institution is among the most important means of promoting its activities, thus increasing its competitive advantage in the market for educational services. Providing a framework for efficient marketing, the functioning of the official website of a higher educational establishment represents a format of public relations, the outcomes of which depend heavily upon numerous factors. Presenting unbiased assessment of a university’s image formalised in terms of officially approved procedures is crucial for winning a respective market share. The Webometrics Ranking of World Universities (also known as Ranking Web of Universities) represents validated data that must not be overlooked by both website administrators and those interested in evaluating a university’s image. Though taken with a great deal of scepticism by some universities, webometrics ranking nevertheless can make the difference when it goes about sprucing up a university’s image and successful appealing to its target audience.

The research work considers the issue of representing global rankings of educational institutions on their official websites as an element of marketing policies devised with the view of gaining a competitive advantage in the global educational space. It is highlighted that university ranks are based on applying diverse criteria and indicators as well as measuring respective values. Criticised are dishonest practices of providing false information aimed at increasing ranks of some educational establishments. The measuring indicators (availability, visibility, transparency (or openness), and excellence (or scientific character)) are analysed based on cybermetric data of research findings obtained by bibliometric methods.

The authors elaborated a set of recommendations as for increasing the efficiency of university website functioning. The key point is to comprehensively select, verify, present and expand contents of a website. It is highlighted that information on the official website of a higher educational establishment should reflect the whole range of educational, scientific research and administrative activities carried out by the academic staff and students. Blended together, they represent the business reputation of the university, which includes its reputation, prestige, partnering relationships, business contacts etc. The authors share their experience in implementing the above measures at Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University.

PDF

References

О. О. Saienko, “Analysis of the use of the complex of marketing communications in promoting educational services of higher educational institutions of the III-IV accreditation level”, Bulletin of the Eastern European University of Economics and Management, vol. 1 (11), pp. 169–178, 2012. (in Ukrainian)

D. A. Shevchenko, “Digital marketing in the field of education”, Practical Marketing, № 1 (251), pp. 3-11 , 2018. (in Russian)

O. V. Zhegus, System of marketing of higher education institutions: theory, methodology, practice, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Ivanchenko I.S., 2018. (in Ukrainian)

C. I. Gritsenko, “The digital marketing is a new development paradigm of educational clusters in the conditions of globalization”, Bulletin of Economic Science of Ukraine, № 1 (30), pp. 29–31, 2016. (in Ukrainian)

O. O. Kalinichenko, “Marketing in education: today and prospects”, Economy. Management. Innovations. vol. №1(22), 2018. [Online]. Available: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/eui_2018_1_8. Accessed on: Feb. 10, 2020. (in English)

M. Oklander, and R. Shemchuk, “Promotion of non-formal education projects digital marketing methods”, Problems of system approach in economy, vol. № 6(74), pp. 140–148, 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2520-2200/2019-6-68 (in Ukrainian)

A. Popovic, “Marketing communications of higher education institutions in the Republic of Serbia”, Marketing, № 46, pp. 166-178, 2015. doi: 10.5937/markt1503166P. (in Ukrainian)

S. O. Karplyuk, “Features of digitalization of the educational process in higher education. Information and digital educational space of Ukraine: transformation processes and prospects of development”, Materials of the methodological seminar of the National Academy of Pedagogical Sciences of Ukraine, pp. 188–197, 2019 (in Ukrainian).

V. V. Osadchyi, and I. M. Serdiuk “Personal site as a means for forming digital image of scientific and pedagogical workers”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 69, № 1, pp. 78-91, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/2593. Accessed on: Feb. 10, 2020. (in Ukrainian)

A. V. Tiutiunnyk, and B. I. Grinchenko “Main criteria and indicators of webometrics ranking of world’s universities”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 38, № 6, pp. 234-244, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/902. Accessed on: Feb. 10, 2020. (in Ukrainian)

Academic Ranking of World Universities. [Online]. Available: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU2019.html. Accessed on: Feb. 02, 2020. (in English)

The Times Higher Education World University Rankings. [Online]. Available: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings. Accessed on: Feb. 10, 2020. (in English)

QS World University Rankings. [Online]. Available: http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings. Accessed on: Feb. 10, 2020. (in English)

Ranking Web of Universities. [Online].Available: http://www.webometrics.info/. Accessed on: Feb. 10, 2020. (in English)

F. Aguillo, B. Granadino, J. L. Ortega, and J. A. Prieto, “Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetric indicators”, Journal of the American Society for the Information Science and Technology, № 57(10), pp. 1296–1302, 2006. (in English)

Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University. [Online]. Available: www.vspu.edu.ua. Accessed on: Feb. 11, 2020. (in Ukrainian)

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
  2. The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.

Content Licensing

  1. Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.

Deposit Policy

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
  4. Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.