USING BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY TO DEVELOP DIGITAL LITERACIES IN THE ESP CLASSROOM
PDF

Keywords

English for Specific Purposes
digital literacies
Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives

How to Cite

[1]
S. H. Vavilina, “USING BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY TO DEVELOP DIGITAL LITERACIES IN THE ESP CLASSROOM”, ITLT, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 168–183, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v79i5.3355.

Abstract

The article explores some issues to be considered when integrating new technologies into English for Specific Purposes (ESP) learning. The main focus is on the challenges that ESP practitioners face in the context of a multilingual digital Europe. In confronting such problems as changing roles for students and teachers, the spread of English as a medium of instruction and increased emphasis on the subject content in the language classroom, it is necessary for ESP teachers to embrace innovation and develop strategies to improve students’ learning. To benefit from the use of technology, ESP teachers need to concentrate on those aspects which digital knowledge and skills share with traditional literacies. When essential elements of digital literacies are singled out, it becomes possible to employ their full potential for creating a technology enhanced learning environment. This research suggests doing it by drawing upon the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. The framework, in this case, is used to check that goals falling within different categories of the cognitive domain of learning are aligned with technology-supported instruction delivery methods. While designing instructional techniques, we heavily rely on the idea of scaffolding in the form of visual aids for enabling learners to build on prior knowledge and internalize new concepts. As practical examples show, development of digital literacies proves not only to be compatible with formation of professional intercultural communicative competence but also providing means for activating the most complex cognitive processes of conceptual understanding, critical thinking, decision making, creation and metacognition. The findings may be useful in preparing instructional activities with the help of technological tools to support ESP teaching and learning.

PDF

References

European Parliament, “Presidency Conclusions. Lisbon European Council (23 and 24 March 2000)”, 2000. [Online]. Available: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm. Accessed on: Jun. 16, 2019. (in English)

S. Carretero, R. Vuorikari and Y. Punie, DigComp 2.1.: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. (in English)

Key competences for lifelong learning. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007. (in English)

The Council of the European Union, “Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance (2018/c/189/01)”, The Official Journal of the European Union, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&from=EN. Accessed on: Jun. 20, 2019. (in English)

European Council, “European Council Conclusions on: migration, digital Europe, security and defense, and external relations (19 October, 2017)”, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21620/19-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf. Accessed on: Jun. 16, 2019. (in English)

European Commission, “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions on the Digital Education Action Plan (SWD (2018) 12 final)”, Brussels, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0022&from=EN. Accessed on: Jun. 22, 2019. (in English)

“About multilingualism policy - Education and Training - European Commission”, Education and Training - European Commission, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/multilingualism/about-multilingualism-policy_en. Accessed on: Jun. 22, 2019. (in English)

“The Letter of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine no. 1/9-120 dated 11.03.2015. - Higher Education”, Vnz.org.ua, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://vnz.org.ua/dokumenty/spysok/7470-lyst-mon-ukrayiny--19-120-vid-11032015r. Accessed on: Jun. 23, 2019. (in Ukrainian)

“Decree of the President of Ukraine no. 5/2015 dated 12.01.2015 “On the strategy for Sustainable Development “Ukraine-2020””, Verhovna Rada of Ukraine [UA], 2015. [Online]. Available: https://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/5/2015. Accessed on: Jun. 23, 2019. (in Ukrainian)

“Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine – On approval of the plan of measures aimed at enhancing learning English for the period until 2020”, Kmu.gov.ua, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/ua/npas/248908037. Accessed on: Jun. 23, 2019. (in Ukrainian)

E. Bárcena, T. Read and J. Arús, Languages for Specific Purposes in the Digital Era. New York: Springer, 2014. (in English)

O. Tarnopolsky, Constructivist Blended Learning Approach to Teaching English for Specific Purposes. London: Versita, 2012. (in English)

C. Barron, "Problem-solving and EAP: themes and issues in a collaborative teaching venture", English for Specific Purposes, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 297-314, 2003. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223849965_Problem-solving_and_EAP_Themes_and_issues_in_a_collaborative_teaching_venture. Accessed on: Jun. 25, 2019. (in English)

C. Wang and L. Winstead, Handbook of research on foreign language education in the digital age. Hershey: IGI Global, 2016. (in English)

N. Stojković, M. Tošić and V. Nejković, Synergies of English for specific purposes and language learning technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017. (in English)

M. Oliver and K. Trigwell, “Can ‘Blended Learning’ Be Redeemed?”, E-Learning and Digital Media, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 17-26, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17. Accessed on: Jun. 26, 2019. (in English)

M. Claypole, Controversies in ELT. Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 2010. (in English)

E. Lesiak-Bielawska, “Technology in ESP Pedagogy”, English for Specific Purposes World, vol. 16, no. 48, 2015. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330656105_Technology_in_ESP. Accessed on: Jun. 26, 2019. (in English)

B. Tomlinson and C. Whittaker, Blended learning in English language teaching. London: British Council, 2013.

D. Coyle, “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Motivating Learners and Teachers”, Scottish Language review, no. 13, pp. 1–18, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://blocs.xtec.cat/clilpractiques1/files/2008/11/slrcoyle.pdf. Accessed on: Jun. 28, 2019. (in English)

D. Marsh, Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). A Development Trajectory. Córdoba: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba, 2012. (in English)

R. Wilkinson, "Content and language integration at universities? Collaborative reflections", International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 607-615, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13670050.2018.1491948. Accessed on: Jun. 29, 2019. (in English)

O. Tarnopolsky, “Content-Based Internet-Assisted Teaching to Ukrainian University Students Majoring in Psychology”, The Reading Matrix, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 184-197, 2009. (in English)

C. Reigeluth, Instructional-design theories and models. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999. (in English)

B. Paltridge and S. Starfield, The handbook of English for specific purposes. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. (in English)

D. Belshaw, The essential elements of digital literacies. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.frysklab.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The-Essential-Elements-of-Digital-Literacies-v1.0.pdf. Accessed on: Jul. 10, 2019. (in English)

L. W. Anderson et al., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition. Boston, USA: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., 2001. (in English)

Cook, G. (2001). The discourse of advertising. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. (in English)

“Conception of Implementation of Media Education in Ukraine (updated)”, Ms.detector.media, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ms.detector.media/mediaprosvita/mediaosvita/kontseptsiya_vprovadzhennya_mediaosviti_v_ukraini_nova_redaktsiya/. Accessed on: Jul. 12, 2019. (in Ukrainian)

C. Redecker and Y. Punie, European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017. (in English)

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
  2. The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.

Content Licensing

  1. Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.

Deposit Policy

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
  4. Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.