Keywords
“Electronic Court”
training of law students
efficiency of justice
How to Cite
Abstract
The article substantiates the necessity of introducing technological solutions into the educational process of future lawyers training, in particular, the study of the “Electronic Court” system, which has become an important step towards transformation of legal activity from the established system to the communication model, which involves de-bureaucratization and increasing the efficiency of legal proceedings. The views of domestic and foreign researchers on the informatization of society reveal numerous risks of the information environment functioning, but in no way reduce the importance of information technologies in improving state institutions. It is substantiated that legal proceedings should not be left to the side of the latest technologies, and therefore the implementation of the “Electronic Court” system is a significant factor in ensuring the accessibility, transparency and efficiency of justice. In this context, the article analyzes the stages of implementation of the e-justice system, which laid the foundations for automation and informatization of the court process and highlights their advantages. The main directions of development of the special course “Electronic Justice” for law students are presented. The division of the special course into blocks is offered: theoretical (lectures) and practical (practical and seminar classes, modeling, excursion classes – visits to judicial bodies). Lectures are offered with the use of multimedia, presentation and demonstration capabilities. As a result of lectures, students get acquainted with the work of the “Electronic Court” system, Internet resources related to the activities of courts, public registers with open access, as well as master the basic provisions of legal acts related to judicial activity. During practical classes, simulation methods are used to shape future lawyers' skills in solving practical situations that arise in the work of court staff in the context of e-justice. At the end of the course a simulation trial is proposed. It is noted that for the practical training of law students, cooperation between institutions of higher education and judicial authorities, as well as intensification of the formation of practical competency of students on the use of tools for electronic justice is important.References
О. Бринцев, “«Електронний суд» в Україні. Досвід та перспективи”. Харків: Право, 2016, 72 с.
И. Боголюбский, “Электронный суд в Украине: возможности, проблемы, перспективы”, Судеб.юрид. газ., 2016. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://sud.ua/newspap er/2016/04/04/89028elektronnij-syd-v-ykraine-vozmozhnosti-problemiperspektivi. Дата звернення: Трав.05.2018.
Н. Логінова, “Упровадження електронного правосуддя в систему судочинства”, Актуальні проблеми держави і права, no. 72, pp. 429-435, 2014.
А. Л. Паскар, “«Електронний суд» – новітній засіб забезпечення доступу до правосуддя,” Науковий вісник Чернівецького університету. Правознавство., no. 682, pp. 70-75, 2013.
О. Федорчук, “Формування у майбутніх правознавців навичок професійного застосування інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій”, автореф. дис. канд. наук, Київ, 2009.
“Електронний суд. Офіційна електронна адреса”.[Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://id.court.gov.ua/. Дата звернення: Трав.04.2018.
“CaseLines: The Evidence Management Platform”.[Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://caselines.com/. Дата звернення: Трав.04.2018.
О. Данильян, “Моральні дилеми інформаційного суспільства”, in Інформаційне суспільство і держава: проблеми взаємодії на сучасному етапі, Харків, 2012, pp. 21-24.
“Концепція галузевої програми інформатизації судів загальної юрисдикції, інших органів та установ судової системи,” Територіальне управління Державної судової адміністрації України в Одеській областi . [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: https://od.court.gov.ua/tu16/info_suddi/conzepcia. Дата звернення: Трав.04.2018.
О. Горєлов, “«Електронний суд» як запорука ефективності проведення судової реформи в Україні”, in Новітні інформаційно-комунікаційні технології в модернізації публічного управління: зарубіжний і вітчизняний досвід, Дніпропетровськ, 2016. [Електронний ресурс]. Режим доступу: http://dridu.dp.ua/konf/konf_dridu/itis%20seminar%202016/pdf/14.pdf. Дата звернення: Трав.04.2018.
REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)
O. Bryntsev, “«Electronic Court» in Ukraine. Experience and Perspectives”. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2016, 72 p. (in Ukrainian)
I. Bogolubskyi, “Electronic court in Ukraine: possibilities, problems, perspectives”, Sud.-yur. gaz., 2016. [online]. Available: http://sud.ua/newspap er/2016/04/04/89028elektronnij-syd-v-ykraine-vozmozhnosti-problemiperspektivi. Accessed on: 05.May.2018. (in Russian)
N. Loginova, “Implementation of e-justice in the judicial system”, Aktual’ni problemy derzhavy i prava, no. 72, pp. 429-435, 2014. (in Ukrainian)
A. L. Paskar, “«Electronic Court» as the latest means of ensuring access to justice,” Naukovyi visnyk Chernivetskogo universytetu. Pravoznavstvo, no. 682, pp. 70-75, 2013. (in Ukrainian)
O. Fedorchuk, “The skills formation of professional usage of information communicational technologies by future lawyers”, abstract of Ph.D. thesis, Kyiv, 2009. (in Ukrainian)
“Digital court. Official electronic address” [online]. Available: https://id.court.gov.ua/. Accessed: 04-May-2018. (in Ukrainian)
“CaseLines: The Evidence Management Platform” [online]. Available: http://caselines.com/. Accessed on: 04.May.2018.
O. Danyl’yan, “The moral dilemmas of the information society”, in Information Society and the State: Problems of Interaction at the Modern Stage, Kharkiv, 2012, pp. 21-24. (in Ukrainian)
“The concept of the sectoral program of informatization of courts of general jurisdiction, other bodies and institutions of the judicial system,” Terytorial’ne upravlinnya Derzhavnoi sudovoi administratsii Ukrainy v Odes’kii oblasti. [online]. Available: https://od.court.gov.ua/tu16/info_suddi/conzepcia. Accessed on: 04.May.2018. (in Ukrainian)
O. Gorelov, “«Electronic court» as a guarantee of the effectiveness of judicial reform in Ukraine”, in Latest information and communication technologies in the modernization of public administration: foreign and domestic experience, Dnipropetrovs’k, 2016. [online]. Available: http://dridu.dp.ua/konf/konf_dridu/itis%20seminar%202016/pdf/14.pdf Accessed on: 04.May.2018. (in Ukrainian)
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
Content Licensing
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.
Deposit Policy
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.