Keywords
virtual exchange
IT skills
How to Cite
Abstract
Innovative information technologies and the rapid rate of information updates reveal the need for more effective two-way communication, facilitation of interaction and collaboration, information exchange and flexibility. The article presents a research on cooperation tools in the virtual exchange project between the Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi Hryhorii Skovoroda State Pedagogical University (Ukraine) and the Trakia University (Bulgaria). A brief description of a specialized course in virtual exchanges related to energy efficiency psychology for future entrepreneurs and industrial workers is presented. In addition to covering the subject matter, educational information is designed in such a way that it enables one to acquire and practice ICT skills, in particular, to use various collaboration tools allowing interaction between students and teachers and having implications for learning strategies. The article’s goal is to test software tools that can be used for virtual exchange in higher education institutions at international level, evaluate their attractiveness to students, and determine whether the use of already familiar collaboration tools influences the general impression from virtual exchange. The experimental work involved 12 useful tools for cooperation in the information field. Leaders and outsiders were identified, that is, tools that participants in the virtual exchange preferred outside the exchange process and those that the participants never used. During each week of the virtual exchange course, new tools for teamwork were used. Leaders in terms of satisfaction with the process of virtual exchange were Skype, Zoom, Webex, Google G-suite, Workplace by Facebook, Cliqtalk, Padlet. The study provides a theoretical basis for informing all individuals interested in the virtual exchange about the relationship between specific tools for collaborative work in the process of virtual exchange and their influence on each other. The results will be taken into account for a more in-depth analysis of the tools functionality in the virtual exchange process. It was also important that absolutely new tools for virtual exchange could have a high assessment in terms of satisfaction with the process and its results. This suggests the motivation to learn, especially in the field of cooperation with the help of information technology, which is so appreciated by young people.
References
Nedelcu, A., & Ulrich, C. (2014). Are we ready for international students? Our university as window and mirror. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 90-96. [Online]. Available: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82475821.pdf (in English).
Nedelcu, A., & Ulrich, C. (2014). Are we ready for international students? Our university as window and mirror. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 142, 90-96. [Online]. Available: https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877042814045212/1-s2.0-S1877042814045212-main.pdf?_tid=64142215-9132-4a28-9801-803793963f2e&acdnat=1551650368_06eee082897cea5ac1af1a3420aff12e (in English).
Bhardwa, S. (2018). Required reading: increasing numbers of international students. [Online]. Available: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/blogs/required-reading-increasing-numbers-international-students (in English).
Study on the feasibility of an Erasmus+ virtual exchange initiative. Final report. [Online]. Available: https://europa.eu/youth/sites/default/files/eyp/eve/attachments/final_report_study_on_the_feasibility_of_an_erasmus_virtual_exchange_initiative.pdf (in English).
Guth, S., & Rubin, J. (2015). Collaborative online international learning: an emerging format for internationalizing curricula. Globally networked teaching in the humanities (pp. 27-39). Routledge (in English).
Marcillo-Gómez, M., & Desilus, B. (2016). Collaborative online international learning experience in practice opportunities and challenges. Journal of technology management & innovation, 11(1), pp.30-35 (in English).
Starke-Meyerring, D., Wilson, M., Crabtree, R. D., Sapp, D. A., Malespin, J. A., & Norori, G. (2008). Designing globally networked learning environments: Visionary partnerships, policies, and pedagogies. Crabtree, RD, & Sapp, DA (with A. Malespín & G. Norori) (in English).
Squire, K. (2010). From information to experience: Place-based augmented reality games as a model for learning in a globally networked society. Teachers College Record, 112(10), pp.2565-2602 (in English).
McNair, L. D., & Paretti, M. C. (2010). Activity theory, speech acts, and the ‘‘doctrine of infelicity’’: Connecting language and technology in globally networked learning environments. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24(3), pp.323-357 (in English).
Wit, H. (2013). COIL – Virtual mobility without commercialisation. [Online]. Available: https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20130528175741647(in English).
O'Dowd, R. (Ed.). (2007). Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers (Vol. 15). Multilingual Matters (in English).
Lee, L., & Markey, A. (2014). A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 26(3), 281-297 (in English).
O'Dowd, R., & Lewis, T. (Eds.). (2016). Online intercultural exchange: Policy, pedagogy, practice. Routledge (in English).
Sonnenwald, D. H., Iivonen, M., Alpi, J., & Kokkinen, H. (1999). Collaborative learning using collaboration technology: Report from the field. In A. Eurelings, F. Gastkemper, P. Kommers, R. Lewis, R. van Meel, & B. Melief, (Eds.), Integrating information and communications technology to higher education. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. pp. 241- 258. [Online]. Available: http://eprints.rclis.org/7989/1/1999-book-chapter.pdf (in English).
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A. & O'Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds) Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science. Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 189-211. (in English).
Yuan, L., MacNeill, S., & Kraan, W. G. (2008). Open Educational Resources-Opportunities and challenges for higher education (in English).
Usluel, Y. K., & Mazman, S. G. (2009). Adoption of Web 2.0 tools in distance education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), pp.818-823 (in English).
Jara, C. A., Candelas, F. A., Torres, F., Dormido, S., Esquembre, F., & Reinoso, O. (2009). Real-time collaboration of virtual laboratories through the Internet. Computers & Education, 52(1), pp.126-140 (in English).
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
Content Licensing
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.
Deposit Policy
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.