SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION AS THE BASIS FOR INNOVATIVE COMPETENCE FORMATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE SOCIETY
PDF (Ukrainian)

Keywords

scientific education
innovative competence
STEAM competence
project-based learning
problem-based learning
inquiry-based learning
digital tools and services

How to Cite

[1]
L. M. Hrynevych, N. V. Morze, and M. A. Boiko, “SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION AS THE BASIS FOR INNOVATIVE COMPETENCE FORMATION IN THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE SOCIETY”, ITLT, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 1–26, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v77i3.3980.

Abstract

The article substantiates the concept of scientific education and its need for high school in the digital transformation of education, provides an overview of innovative teaching methods that can be effectively used to spread scientific thinking to a wider range of subjects and the formation of STEAM and innovation competence as the key one. The authors investigate the theoretical grounds for scientific education. The list of knowledge, skills and activities that are part of STEAM and innovation competence is given. It is proved that their formation requires targeted use of the method of educational projects, problem-based learning and research-cognitive method in the educational process. The article describes the features of these innovative pedagogical technologies in the implementation of scientific education in secondary schools based on the use of modern digital technologies and tools. The authors investigate the level of awareness of such methods and the practice of their application among Ukrainian teachers. The study involved teachers from five Ukrainian universities that are partners of Borys Hrinchenko University of Kyiv under the MoPED project ("Modernization of pedagogical higher education using innovative teaching tools MOPED" - №586098-EPP-1-2017-1-EN-EPPKA2 -CBHE-JP) to identify the needs for the study of modern educational trends and the appropriate innovative pedagogical technologies and digital tools for their provision. The article presents the results that demonstrate the level of teachers' interest in mastering digital tools. The groups of tools for the development of scientific education are described. They include creating students’ positive motivation, stimulating their creativity, forming non-standard creative thinking, learning about the world around them, conducting experiments, finding new methods for problem situations solving. On the basis of the research, the directions for teacher training for the development of scientific education and the formation of innovative and STEAM competence in the context of digital transformation of the society are identified.

PDF (Ukrainian)

References

Міністерство цифрової трансформації. Цифрова грамотність населення України 2019. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://osvita.diia.gov.ua/uploads/0/585-cifrova_gramotnist_naselenna_ukraini_20 19_compressed.pdf

В. Биков, О. Спірін, О. Пінчук «Сучасні завдання цифрової трансформації освіти», Вісник Кафедри ЮНЕСКО "Неперервна професійна освіта ХХІ століття", № 1 (1), с. 27-36, 2020, doi: 10.35387/ucj.1(1).2020.27-36

Кабінет Міністрів України. "Концепція розвитку цифрової економіки та суспільства України на 2018-2020 роки (2018)" Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/67-2018-%D1%80

European Commission. Science Education for Responsible Citizenship (2015). pp.8-11. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/ KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf,.

Верховна Рада України. (2145-VIII від 05.09.2017). Закон України «Про освіту». [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19

І. Бех, Н. Бібік, В. Биков та ін., Енциклопедія освіти. К : Юрінком Інтер, 2008.

Ю. Гоцуляк, «Наукова освіта в Україні: теоретичний та нормативно-правовий контекст», Освіта та розвиток обдарованої особистості. № 4. с. 5-11, 2016.

С. Бабійчук, «Наукова освіта як педагогічний концепт», Молодь і ринок, 2018. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: mir.dspu.edu.ua

R. Schulz, Reforming Science Education: Part I. The Search for a Philosophy of Science Education, Sci & Educ, vol. 18, pp. 225–249, 2009.

Л. Гриневич та ін., Нова українська школа. Концептуальні засади реформування середньої школи, 36 с., 2016. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/zagalna%20serednya/nova-ukrainska-shkola-compressed.pdf

І. Коновальчук, «Сутність і структура інноваційної компетентності педагога загальноосвітнього навчального закладу», Вісник Прикарпатського національного університету. Серія: Педагогіка, Вип. XL, с. 85-88, 2011.

Network of National Contact Points for Science with and for Society in Horizon 2020. Science education policies in the European Comission: towards responsible citizenship (October 2016). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.sisnetwork.eu/media/sisnet/Policy_Brief_Science_Education.pdf

H. Gonzalez, J. Kuenzi, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): A Primer, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, 2012.

Національний Звіт за результатами міжнародного дослідження якості освіти PISA-2018. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://testportal.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA_2018_Report_UKR.pdf

M. Barber, M. Mourshed, How the World’s Best-Performing School Systems Come Out on Top, McKinsey & Company, 2007. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно:. http:// mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Education/Worlds_School_Systems_Final.pdf

D. Rychen, L.Salganik, Defining and Selecting Key Competencies. The Creative Age. London: Demos, 2001

Кабінет міністрів України. Постанова від 24 липня 2019 р. № 688. Про внесення змін до Державного стандарту початкової освіти. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/688-2019-%D0%BF

Міністерство освіти та науки України. Проєкт державного стандарту базової середньої освіти (4 березня 2020 року). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/news/mon-proponuye-dlya-gromadskogo-obgovorennya-proyekt-derzhavnogo-standartu-bazovoyi-serednoyi-osviti

J. Marin-Garcia et al., «Proposal of framework for innovation competencies development and assessment (FINCODA)». WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, vol. 7(2), pp. 119-126, 2016

Unlocking Innovation: Training Teams and Individuals to have Every Day Breakthroughs (6 February 2014). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.slideshare.net/ccgmag/unlocking-innovation-training-teams-and-individuals-to-have-every-day-breakthroughs

L. Vestergaard, K. Moberg, C. Jørgensen, «Odense: The Danish Foundation for Entrepreneurship», Young Enterprise, 2012

Європейська комісія. EntreComp: Рамка підприємницької компетентності (2016). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://ipq.org.ua/upload/files/files/03_Novyny/2016.07.8-9_EntrComp/EntreComp Framework%20UKR.pdf

M. Subramaniam, M.A. Youndt, «The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities», Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, pp. 450-463, 2005

H. Jang, «Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data», Journal of Science Education and Technologies vol.25, pp. 284–301, 2016, DOI 10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1

Innovation Competency Model (April 2011). [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.innovationinpractice.com/innovation_in_practice/2011/04/innovation-competency-model.html

B. Duch, S. Groh, D. Allen, «Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education». The power of problem-based learning. Sterling, V.Stylus, pp. 3-11, 2001

National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, National Science Education Standards, National Research Council, 1996. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://www.csun.edu/science/ref/curriculum/reforms/nses/nses-complete.pdf

M. Pedaste, M. Mäeots, Ä. Leijen, S. Sarapuu, «Improving students’ inquiry skills through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds», Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, vol. 9, pp. 81–95, 2012

T. Jong, W. Joolingen, «Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains». Review of Educational Research, vol. 68, pp. 179–202, 1998

R. Bybee, J. Taylor, A. Gardner, et al. «The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness». Colorado Springs, [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://pdspalooza.pbworks.com/f/bscs5eexecsummary.pdf

B. White, J. Frederiksen, «Metacognitive facilitation: An approach to making scientific inquiry accessible to all», Inquiring into inquiry, learning and teaching in science, pp. 331–370, 2000

C. Manoli, M. Pedaste, M. Mäeots, L. Siiman, Ton De Jong, et al, «Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle», Educational Research Review, Elsevier, v. 14, pp. 47–61, 2015


REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

Ministry of Digital Transformation. Digital literacy of the population of Ukraine 2019. [Online]. Available: https://osvita.diia.gov.ua/uploads/0/585-cifrova_gramotnist_naselenna_ukraini_20 19_compressed.pdf (in Ukrainian)

V. Bykov, O. Spirin, and O. Pinchuk «Modern tasks of digital transformation of education», Bulletin of the Department of UNESCO "Continuing professional education of the XXI century", № 1 (1), pp. 27-36, 2020, doi: 10.35387 / ucj.1 (1) .2020.27-36 (in Ukrainian)

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. The concept of development of the digital economy and society of Ukraine for 2018-2020 (2018). [Online]. Available: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/67-2018-%D1%80 (in Ukrainian)

European Commission. Science Education for Responsible Citizenship (2015), pp.8-11. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/ KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf, (in English)

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2145-VIII dated 05.09.2017). Law of Ukraine «On Education». [Online]. Available: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19 (in Ukrainian)

I. Bekh, N. Bibik, V. Bykov and others, Encyclopedia of Education. K: Jurinkom Inter, 2008 (in Ukrainian)

J. Gotsulyak, «Scientific education in Ukraine: theoretical and legal context», Education and development of gifted personality. № 4. p. 5-11, 2016 (in Ukrainian)

S. Babiychuk, "Scientific education as a pedagogical concept", Youth and the market, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://mir.dspu.edu.ua (in Ukrainian)

R. Schulz, «Reforming Science Education: Part I.», The Search for a Philosophy of Science Education, Sci & Educ, vol. 18, pp. 225–249, 2009 (in English)

L. Hrynevych and others, New Ukrainian School. Conceptual principles of secondary school reform, 36 p., 2016. [Online]. Available: https://mon.gov.ua/storage/app/media/zagalna%20serednya/nova-ukrainska-shkola-compressed.pdf (in Ukrainian)

I. Konovalchuk, «The essence and structure of innovative competence of a teacher of a secondary school», Bulletin of the Precarpathian National University. Series: Pedagogy, Issue. XL, p. 85-88, 2011(in Ukrainian)

Network of National Contact Points for Science with and for Society in Horizon 2020. Science education policies in the European Comission: towards responsible citizenship (October 2016). [Online]. Available: https://www.sisnetwork.eu/media/sisnet/Policy_Brief_Science_Education.pdf (in English)

H. Gonzalez, and J. Kuenzi, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): A Primer, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service, 2012. (in English)

National Report on the Results of the International Survey on the Quality of Education PISA-2018. [Online]. Available: https://testportal.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA_2018_Report_UKR.pdf (in Ukrainian)

M. Barber, and M. Mourshed, How the World’s Best-Performing School Systems Come Out on Top, McKinsey & Company, 2007. [Online]. Available: http:// mckinseyonsociety.com/downloads/reports/Education/Worlds_School_Systems_Final.pdf (in English)

D. Rychen, and L.Salganik, Defining and Selecting Key Competencies. The Creative Age. London: Demos, 2001. (in English)

Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Resolution of July 24, 2019 № 688. On amendments to the State Standard of Primary Education. [Online]. Available: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/688-2019-%D0%BF (in Ukrainian)

Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Draft state standard of basic secondary education (March 4, 2020). [Online]. Available: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/news/mon-proponuye-dlya-gromadskogo-obgovorennya-proyekt-derzhavnogo-standartu-bazovoyi-serednoyi-osviti (in Ukrainian)

J. Marin-Garcia et al., «Proposal of framework for innovation competencies development and assessment (FINCODA)». WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, vol. 7(2), pp. 119-126, 2016(in English)

Unlocking Innovation: Training Teams and Individuals to have Every Day Breakthroughs (6 February 2014). [Online]. Available: https://www.slideshare.net/ccgmag/unlocking-innovation-training-teams-and-individuals-to-have-every-day-breakthroughs (in English)

L. Vestergaard, K. Moberg, and C. Jørgensen, «Odense: The Danish Foundation for Entrepreneurship», Young Enterprise, 2012(in English)

European Commission. EntreComp: Entrepreneurial Competence Framework (2016). [Online]. Available: http://ipq.org.ua/upload/files/files/03_Novyny/2016.07.8-9_EntrComp/EntreComp Framework%20UKR.pdf (in Ukrainian)

M. Subramaniam, and M.A. Youndt, «The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities», Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, pp. 450-463, 2005. (in English)

H. Jang, «Identifying 21st Century STEM Competencies Using Workplace Data», Journal of Science Education and Technologies, vol.25, pp. 284–301, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10956-015-9593-1 (in English)

Innovation Competency Model (April 2011). [Online]. Available: https://www.innovationinpractice.com/innovation_in_practice/2011/04/innovation-competency-model.html (in English)

B. Duch, S. Groh, and D. Allen, «Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education». The power of problem-based learning. Sterling, V.Stylus, pp. 3-11, 2001

National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, National Science Education Standards, National Research Council, 1996, [Online]. Available: https://www.csun.edu/science/ref/curriculum/reforms/nses/nses-complete.pdf (in English)

M. Pedaste, M. Mäeots, Ä. Leijen, and S. Sarapuu, «Improving students’ inquiry skills through reflection and self-regulation scaffolds», Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, vol. 9, pp. 81–95, 2012. (in English)

T. Jong, and W. Joolingen, «Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains». Review of Educational Research, vol. 68, pp. 179–202, 1998. (in English)

R. Bybee, J. Taylor, A. Gardner, et al. «The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness». Colorado Springs. [Online]. Available: http://pdspalooza.pbworks.com/f/bscs5eexecsummary.pdf (in English)

B. White, and J. Frederiksen, «Metacognitive facilitation: An approach to making scientific inquiry accessible to all», Inquiring into inquiry, learning and teaching in science, pp. 331–370, 2000. (in English)

C. Manoli, M. Pedaste, M. Mäeots, L. Siiman, Ton De Jong, et al, «Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle», Educational Research Review, Elsevier, vol. 14, pp. 47–61, 2015. (in English)

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
  2. The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.

Content Licensing

  1. Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.

Deposit Policy

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
  4. Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.