THE PECULIARITIES OF ORGANISING THE ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS’ DISTANCE LEARNING OUTCOMES UNDER MARTIAL LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v97i5.5388Keywords:
distance learning in martial law conditions;, means and tools for evaluating learning outcomes;, survey of teachers of schools (general secondary education institutions).Abstract
The article presents the results of an experimental study of the peculiarities of the organization of evaluation of the results of distance learning in Ukrainian schools under martial law. The research was carried out through a wide survey of school teaching staff using Google Forms technology. Attention is focused on clarifying the periodicity, methods and forms of current and final evaluation of the results of student learning in the conditions of distance education; identifying means and tools for evaluating the results of distance learning, which are preferred by teachers; elucidation of the peculiarities and main difficulties in the organization of the evaluation of the results of the students' education in the conditions of martial law; identifying changes in assessment procedures and approaches to choosing the means of its implementation.
The practical experience of Ukrainian teachers regarding the use of technologies and assessment tools during distance learning is summarized. The main difficulties that complicating the implementation of assessment procedures in wartime conditions are analyzed. The problem of reducing the success of students, the independent performance of educational tasks by students as a condition for ensuring the objectivity of the assessment of learning results has been updated. Attention is focused on the trend of increasing importance of assessment of learning results in the synchronous mode; the need to improve its means and tools in order to increase objectivity, prevent academic dishonesty, motivation for self-education and self-development; the expediency of developing special didactic support, focused on the systematic application by acquirers of the skills of analysis, synthesis, and creation of new knowledge.
The areas of improvement of the mechanisms of the organization of evaluation of the results of distance learning of students of general secondary education, the expediency of the development of digital literacy of teachers and students, the need to create didactic support for online learning integrated into a single educational and methodological complex have been determined.
Downloads
References
В. Ю. Биков, О. В. Овчарук, І. В. Іванюк, О. П. Пінчук та В. О. Гальпєріна, “Сучасний стан використання цифрових засобів для організації дистанційного навчання в закладах загальної середньої освіти: результати опитування 2022”, Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, вип. 90, № 4, с. 1-18, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v90i4.5036.
H. Champeaux, L. Mangiavacchi, F. Marchetta and L. Piccoli, “Child development and distance learning in the age of COVID-19”, Review of Economics of the Household, vol. 20, issue 3, pp. 659-685, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-022-09606-w.
C. Pirrone, D. Di Corrado, A. Privitera, S. Castellano and S. Varrasi, “Students’ Mathematics Anxiety at Distance and In-Person Learning Conditions during COVID-19 Pandemic: Are There Any Differences? An Exploratory Study”, Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 379, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060379.
I. Šimonová, L. Faltýnková, K. Kostolányová and S. Klimszova, “Re-thinking the online distance instruction based on students’ feedback”, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 6-39, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09332-3.
K. Bozgun, A. Ozaskin-Arslan and Ş. Uluçinar-Sağir, “COVID-19 and Distance Education: Evaluation in the Context of Twenty-first Century Skills”, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, pp. 1-12, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00663-4.
M. Ögeyik, “Using Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy as a framework to evaluate webcast learning experience in the context of Covid-19 pandemic”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 11219-11235, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11064-x.
Y. Zheng and Sh. Zheng, “A Comparison of Students’ Learning Behaviors and Performance Among Pre, During and Post COVID-19 Pandemic”, SIGITE '22: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, рр. 78-85, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3537674.3554753.
M. Tremblay and A. M. Delobbe, “Distance learning and assessment of mathematics during COVID-19” [“Enseignement et évaluation des mathématiques à distance durant la COVID-19”], Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, vol. 47, no. 4: Special Issue, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28098.
М. І. Бурда та Д. В. Васильєва, “Відеолекції у навчанні математики учнів 5-6 класів”, Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, вип. 85, № 5, с. 14-28, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v85i5.4609.
М. І. Бурда та Д. В. Васильєва, “Стан дистанційного навчання математики у 2020-2021 роках”, Математика в рідній школі, № 4, с. 2-6, 2021. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/727923/. Дата звернення: Липня 18, 2023.
Д. Васильєва, “Стан дистанційного навчання математики під час війни в Україні”, Український Педагогічний журнал, № 2, с. 38–47, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2022-2-38-47.
Т. Годованюк та Д. Васильєва, “Деякі аспекти організації змішаного навчання математики в закладах середньої освіти”, Український Педагогічний журнал, № 2, с. 105–115, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2022-2-105-115.
A. K. S. Ong et al., “Preference Analysis on the Online Learning Attributes among Senior High School Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach”, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 92, 102100, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102100.
А. Aykan and B. Yildirim, “The Integration of a Lesson Study Model into Distance STEM Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Teachers’ Views and Practice”, Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 609–637, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09564-9.
E. Martins and N. Felix, “Aluno aprendiz em educação a distância: material didático e avaliação”, Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, vol. 21, рр. 799-813, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v21.n.esp1.out.2017.9899.
L. García Aretio, “Can we trust evaluation in distance and digital education systems?” [“¿Podemos fiarnos de la evaluación en los sistemas de educación a distancia y digitales?”], RIED-Revista Iberoamericana De Educación a Distancia, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 9-29, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.30223.
Дистанційне навчання в умовах карантину: досвід та перспективи : аналітико-методичні матеріали. Київ, Україна: Педагогічна думка, 2021. doi: http://doi.org/10.32405/978-966-644-596-7-2021-192.
О. В. Овчарук та І. В. Іванюк, Результати онлайн-опитування «Готовність і потреби вчителів щодо використання цифрових засобів та ІКТ в умовах карантину: січень-лютий 2022» аналітичний звіт. Київ, Україна: ІЦО НАПН України, 2022. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/730808/. Дата звернення: Липня 18, 2023.
С. О. Науменко та С. Г. Головко, “Особливості оцінювання результатів дистанційного навчання здобувачів загальної середньої освіти в Україні”, на Зб. матеріалів ІІ Міжнародної науково-практичної інтернет-конф. Світ дидактики: дидактика в сучасному світі, Київ, 2023, с 63-67. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/734250/. Дата звернення: Липня 18, 2023.
REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)
V. Yu. Bykov, O. V. Ovcharuk, I. V. Ivaniuk, O. P. Pinchuk and V. O. Halpierina, “ The current state of the use of digital tools for organization of distance learning in general secondary education institutions: 2022 results”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 1-18, 2022.doi: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v90i4.5036. (in Ukrainian).
H. Champeaux, L. Mangiavacchi, F. Marchetta and L. Piccoli, “Child development and distance learning in the age of COVID-19”, Review of Economics of the Household, vol. 20, issue 3, pp. 659-685, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-022-09606-w. (in English).
C. Pirrone, D. Di Corrado, A. Privitera, S. Castellano and S. Varrasi, “Students’ Mathematics Anxiety at Distance and In-Person Learning Conditions during COVID-19 Pandemic: Are There Any Differences? An Exploratory Study”, Education Sciences, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 379, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060379. (in English).
I. Šimonová, L. Faltýnková, K. Kostolányová and S. Klimszova, “Re-thinking the online distance instruction based on students’ feedback”, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 6-39, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09332-3. (in English).
K. Bozgun, A. Ozaskin-Arslan and Ş. Uluçinar-Sağir, “COVID-19 and Distance Education: Evaluation in the Context of Twenty-first Century Skills”, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, pp. 1-12, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00663-4. (in English).
M. Ögeyik, “Using Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy as a framework to evaluate webcast learning experience in the context of Covid-19 pandemic”, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 11219-11235, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11064-x. (in English).
Y. Zheng and Sh. Zheng, “A Comparison of Students’ Learning Behaviors and Performance Among Pre, During and Post COVID-19 Pandemic”, SIGITE '22: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, рр. 78-85, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3537674.3554753. (in English).
M. Tremblay and A. M. Delobbe, “Distance learning and assessment of mathematics during COVID-19” [“Enseignement et évaluation des mathématiques à distance durant la COVID-19”], Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, vol. 47, no. 4: Special Issue, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28098. (in French).
M. I. Burda and D. V. Vasylieva, “Videos in learning mathematics of 5-6 forms students”, Information Technologies and Learning Tools, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 14-28, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v85i5.4609. (in Ukrainian).
M. I. Burda and D. V. Vasylieva, “The state of distance learning of mathematics in 2020-2021”, Mathematics in native school, no. 4, pp. 2-6, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/727923/. Accessed: July 18, 2023. (in Ukrainian).
D. Vasylieva, “State of mathematics remote teaching during the war in Ukraine”, Ukrainian Educational Journal, no. 2, pp. 38–47, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2022-2-38-47. (in Ukrainian).
T. Hodovaniuk and D. Vasylieva, “Some aspects of mathematics blended learning organization in schools”, Ukrainian Educational Journal, no. 2, pp. 105–115, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2022-2-105-115. (in Ukrainian).
A. K. S. Ong et al., “Preference Analysis on the Online Learning Attributes among Senior High School Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Conjoint Analysis Approach”, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 92, 102100, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102100. (in English).
А. Aykan and B. Yildirim, “The Integration of a Lesson Study Model into Distance STEM Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Teachers’ Views and Practice”, Technology, Knowledge and Learning, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 609–637, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09564-9. (in English).
E. Martins and N. Felix, “Aluno aprendiz em educação a distância: material didático e avaliação”, Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, vol. 21, рр. 799-813, 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v21.n.esp1.out.2017.9899. (in Portuguese).
L. García Aretio, “Can we trust evaluation in distance and digital education systems?” [“¿Podemos fiarnos de la evaluación en los sistemas de educación a distancia y digitales?”], RIED-Revista Iberoamericana De Educación a Distancia, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 9-29, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.2.30223. (in Spanish).
Distance learning in quarantine: experience and prospects. Analytical and methodological materials. Kyiv, Ukraine: Pedahohichna dumka, 2021. doi: http://doi.org/10.32405/978-966-644-596-7-2021-192. (in Ukrainian).
O. V. Ovcharuk and I. V. Ivaniuk, Results of the online survey "Readiness and needs of teachers for the use of digital tools and ICT in quarantine: January-February 2022" analytical report. Kyiv, Ukraine: Institute for Digitalisation of Education of the NAES of Ukraine, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/730808/. Accessed: July 18, 2023. (in Ukrainian).
S. O. Naumenko and S. H. Holovko, “Peculiarities of evaluating the results of distance learning of students of general secondary education in Ukraine”, in Zb. materialiv II Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi internet-konf. The world of didactics: didactics in the modern world, Kyiv, 2023, рр. 63-67. [Online]. Available: https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/734250/. Accessed: July 18, 2023. (in Ukrainian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Світлана Григорівна Головко, Юрій Олексійович Жук, Світлана Олександрівна Науменко
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
- The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.
Content Licensing
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows others freely to read, download, copy and print submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.
Deposit Policy
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see this journal’s registered deposit policy at Sherpa/Romeo directory).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Post-print (post-refereeing manuscript version) and publisher's PDF-version self-archiving is allowed.
- Archiving the pre-print (pre-refereeing manuscript version) not allowed.
"Information Technologies and Learning Tools" is licensed under