electronic portfolio (ePortfolio)
English for Specific Purposes (ESP)
professional identity
communicative competences

How to Cite

O. Polyakova, “E-PORTFOLIO IN STUDENTS’ LEARNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT”, ITLT, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1–14, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v96i4.5238.


Enhancing technical education by connecting sustainable development goals within the English for Specific Purposes framework requires motivating the professional advancement of students. Therefore, choosing an engaging active learning tool becomes one of the most crucial components of this process. Our understanding of ePortfolio as an all-inclusive and sustainable toolkit to provide non-native English speakers with new sources of professional growth and self-esteem has evolved into the current study's didactic and research scenario. The monitoring of 18 experimental group members while compiling individual electronic portfolios in English helped us explore their progress in terms of both linguistic and professional proficiencies. For this, qualitative and quantitative tools gathered learners` perceptions that were later analysed by statistic and sentiment analysis software. As a result, a visible improvement in B2 mediation, B2 reading and B2 writing communicative competences was detected; a collective awareness of a quality professional background presentation is another outcome of the study. A few technological means in the ESP and research context supported those achievements. The blended focus of this exploration might interest L2 practitioners and educators who are hesitant about involving measurements and analysis tools in their practice. By embracing the two-fold paradigm described above, we now understand that research happens while we are teaching. The study's results show how a method for teaching and researching English backed by technology may be applied in real-world settings. We expect this experience will motivate future efforts to combine the SDGs and ESP in higher education. Quality language instruction may serve as the cornerstone of future professional success while addressing the pressing demand for long-term adaptation to meet engineering specifications.



C. Bigan, ‘Trends in Teaching Artificial Intelligence for Industry 5.0’, in Sustainability and Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises, Springer, 2022, pp. 257–274. (in English)

S. Albareda-Tiana, S. Vidal-Raméntol, and M. Fernández-Morilla, ‘Implementing the sustainable development goals at University level’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 473–497, 2018. (in English)

United Nations, ‘General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1. Transforming Our World, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.’ Sep. 25, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf (in English)

R. Ojeda Suárez and F. C. Agüero Contreras, ‘Globalización, Agenda 2030 e imperativo de la educación superior: reflexiones’, Conrado, vol. 15, no. 67, pp. 125–134, 2019. (in English)

K. Bosselmann, ‘University and Sustainability: compatible agendas?’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 167–186, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2001.tb00261.x. (in English)

M. I. Shahidul, ‘Engineering education for achieving sustainable development goals by 2030: Revealing the paths for challenging climate change and Covid 19’, sustainable development, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 403–410, 2020. (in English)

A. B. Molinero and R. C. Pereira, ‘Professional identity construction in higher education: a conceptual framework of the influencing factors and research agenda’, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1605–1610, 2013. (in English)

S. L. Rodriguez, C. Lu, and M. Bartlett, ‘Engineering Identity Development: A Review of the Higher Education Literature’, International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, pp. 254–265, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.18404/ijemst.428182. (in English)

N. Chomsky, Aspects of the theory of syntax, 3. in Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Cambridge, Mass.). Research Laboratory of Electronics. Special technical report, no. 11. Cambridge, Mass: M. I. T. Press, 1970. (in English)

D. Hymes, ‘On communicative competence’, in Sociolinguistics, J. B. Pride and J. Holmes, Eds., London: Penguin Books, 1972, pp. 269–293. (in English)

S. J. Savignon, ‘Communicative Competence’, in The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, J. I. Liontas, T. International Association, and M. DelliCarpini, Eds., Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2017, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0047. (in English)

H. Basturkmen, Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. New York: Routledge, 2014. (in English)

L. Woodrow, Introducing course design in English for specific purposes, vol. 184. Routledge Londres, UK, 2018. (in English)

M. Asmali, ‘Integrating technology into ESP classes: Use of student response system in English for specific purposes instruction’, Teaching English with Technology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 86–104, 2018. (in English)

S. Whyte, ‘Revisiting communicative competence in the teaching and assessment of language for specific purposes’, LEA, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.29140/lea.v2n1.33. (in English)

O. Polyakova and R. Galstyan-Sargsyan, ‘Communicative competences in non-linguistic university degrees’, Language Value, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 45–70, Dec. 2019, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2019.11.4. (in English)

Council of Europe, Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment; companion volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2020. (in English)

M. Ginsburg, ‘Improving educational quality through active-learning pedagogies: A comparison of five case studies’, Educational Research, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 62–74, 2010. (in English)

N. Mačianskienė and V. Bijeikienė, ‘Fostering active learner engagement in ESP classes’, in Key issues in English for specific purposes in higher education, Springer, 2018, pp. 223–242. (in English)

L. S. Vygotsky, Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978. (in English)

S. V. Ohremenko, M. P. Kostiuchenko, and А. А. Kalenskyi, ‘Online indicators of professional competece of builders’, ITLT, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 52–69, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.33407/itlt.v91i5.5022. (in Ukrainian)

H. Mgarbi, M. Y. Chkouri, and A. Tahiri, ‘Towards a new construction of digital identity based on the e-portfolio approach’, International Journal of Open Information Technologies, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 37–42, 2021. (in English)

L. M. S. Khoo, D. Maor, and R. Schibeci, ‘The engineering eportfolio: Enhancing communication, critical thinking and problem solving and team work skills?’, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 77, pp. 1027–1032, 2011. (in English)

L. J. Cronbach, ‘Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests’, Psychometrika, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–334, Sep. 1951, doi: 10.1007/BF02310555. (in English)

W. D. Crano, M. B. Brewer, and A. Lac, Principles and methods of social research, Third edition. New York: Routledge, 2014. (in English)

R. F. DeVellis, Scale development: theory and applications, 2nd ed. in Applied social research methods series, no. v. 26. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc, 2003. (in English)

M. Tavakol and R. Dennick, ‘Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha’, Int. J. Medical Education, vol. 2, pp. 53–55, 2011, doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. (in English)

N. B. Robbins and R. M. Heiberger, ‘Plotting Likert and other rating scales’, in Proceedings of Joint Statistical Meetings, American Statistical Association, 2011, pp. 1058–1066. (in English)

A. Moreno Ortiz, ‘Lingmotif: A user-focused sentiment analysis tool’, Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, vol. 58, 2017. (in English)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Oksana Polyakova


Download data is not yet available.